Skip to content


Making - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: making Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.085 seconds)
Jan 03 2005 (TRI)

indag Rubber Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-03-2005

..... may be due to various factors hence even on merits the respondent has failed to make out a case for refund since relevant factors stated above have not been examined by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 2005 (TRI)

Continental Coffee Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-07-2005

Reported in: (2005)(103)ECC113

..... the plant would be of no value if it could not be made functional to make the plant operational licence and technical know how had to be obtained it was under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 15 2005 (TRI)

Business Combines Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-15-2005

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT67Tri(Mum.)bai

..... no allegation of the two or more lots so alleged to have been mixed to make up the quantity lost due to segregating have been procured at different values of duty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 15 2005 (TRI)

Cona Inds. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-15-2005

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT208Tri(Mum.)bai

..... and that would definitely be held to have caused a prejudice to the notice to make an effective defence and in facts of this case coupled with no effective personal hearing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 14 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Usha Conductors (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jul-14-2005

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT378Tri(Bang.)

..... under sub section 1 or sub section 2 the adjudicating authority or the authorized officer makes an application to the appellate tribunal or the commissioner appeals within a period of three .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Himalaya Drug Company Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jul-08-2005

Reported in: (2005)(189)ELT471Tri(Bang.)

..... relieve scalp itch mere additionof some perfume to get rid of unpleasant odour will not make theimpugned goods perfumed hair oils as per heading no 3305 10 iii the revenue relied .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Edhayam Frozen Foods

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-08-2005

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT72Tri(Chennai)

..... authority act mpeda act for short the apc act was enacted with the object of making better financial provision for the indian council agricultural research the mpeda act was made to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 2005 (TRI)

Mahindra Ugine Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Airport

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-07-2005

..... on imported refractory bricks of special shape for use as replacements in industrial furnaces for making of steel the ground for denial is that the refractory bricks are not component parts .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 06 2005 (TRI)

Glaxo Smithkline Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-06-2005

Reported in: (2005)(188)ELT171Tri(Mum.)bai

..... no m 514 wzb 05 cii dated 9 12 2004 of this tribunal does not make very clear reading and its meaning somewhat unclear therefore we have considered it appropriate to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 15 2005 (TRI)

Shri Ganesh Enterprise Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-15-2005

..... did not accept the appellant s claim and passed the impugned order 4 i may make it clear at the outset that the all the three appeals are relatable to only .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //