Skip to content


Making - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: making Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.097 seconds)
Dec 08 2004 (FN)

Kp Permanent Make-up, Inc. Vs. Lasting Impression I, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-08-2004

..... v silstar corp 110 f 3d at 243 nor would it make sense to provide an affirmative defense of no confusion plus good faith ..... has carried its own burden on that point nor would it make sense to provide an affirmative defense of no confusion plus good ..... to show nonconfusion on a defendant if a plaintiff succeeds in making out a prima facie case of trademark infringement including the element .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2004 (TRI)

Eicher Tractors and anr. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-14-2004

Reported in: (2004)(117)LC709Tri(Delhi)

..... appellant s liability in such cases the appellant contended that they were not required to make any fresh assessment of the inputs so cleared they were only required to reverse the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 20 2004 (TRI)

Hindustan Rimmer Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-20-2004

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC213

..... heading that similar same goods are exported to a foreign market as a different product makes no difference the positioning of a product can vary depending upon markets a product name .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 19 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Genius Leathercraft Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-19-2004

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC121

..... cart the fact that school bag can be kept on a trolley cart does not make a trolley cart as accessory of such bag for the purpose of itc hs classification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 19 2004 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Johari Digital Health Care Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-19-2004

Reported in: (2004)(115)LC559Tri(Delhi)

..... mere fact that the goods imported by them are classifiable under chapter 85 will not make them ineligible for the benefit of the exemption notification the commissioner appeals has rightly given .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2004 (TRI)

Faxtel System (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2004

Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC369

..... to be rejected by applying the ratio of the decision in flock india but we make it clear that we do not express any view on the contention taken by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2004 (TRI)

Ceekay DaikIn Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-17-2004

Reported in: (2004)(175)ELT668Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 02 98 due to inability of the transporter viz transport corporation of india tci to make the truck available on 15 02 98 the said goods could not be despatched on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2004 (TRI)

Transweigh (India) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-14-2004

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT527Tri(Mum.)bai

..... ltd v union of india wherein it has been held that the act does not make any distinction between different categories of service providers be they individuals partnership concerns or the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 2004 (TRI)

Neg Micon (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-13-2004

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT29TriDel

..... condition for import under an agreement entered into three years back the licence fee agreement makes it clear that licence fee was a compensation for the r amp d cost incurred .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 21 2004 (TRI)

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-21-2004

Reported in: (2005)(99)ECC319

..... authorities had initiated proceedings on the ground that the assessee had obtained the licence by making a mis representation as regards the value of components and that the value indicated in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //