Skip to content


Making - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: making Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.127 seconds)
Jan 01 2002 (TRI)

Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT182TriDel

..... findings arrived at by the lower authority in his order 5 the appellants are however making a further submission that the refund claim relates to the duty paid on the wrapping .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 2002 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Avon Beauty Products (i) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC522

..... the packages and that it cannot be said that not following the legal requirement would make the products non marketable ld counsel submits that similar issue came up before the tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2002 (TRI)

Minwool Rock Fibres Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-22-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC336

..... rules for the interpretation of the central excise schedule follow rule 1 what rule 1 makes clear is that classifications shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2002 (TRI)

Commercial Steel Engg. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-22-2002

Reported in: (2003)(85)ECC376

..... that the orders were passed in respect of the first notice on 14 9 90 making it very clear that on merits the products attracted central excise duty under chapter heading .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 2002 (TRI)

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-21-2002

Reported in: (2004)(161)ELT251Tri(Mum.)bai

..... establish its claim of modvat or proforma credit and to notification 121 94 and to make submissions on limitation within a month from the receipt of this order the commissioner shall .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 2002 (TRI)

Woodmen Industries Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Aug-21-2002

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT787Tri(Kol.)kata

..... the appellants from their buyer company and apart from the bills amount they were also making realisation in cash on the above basis they were issued a show cause notice proposing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 2002 (TRI)

Benadict Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-16-2002

..... section 108 of the customs act were not specifically conferred upon the superintendent it would make no difference the statement made by the appellant continues to be in the nature of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 2002 (TRI)

Eimco-kcp Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-16-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC307

..... times the torque or the force required for rotary motion is the same and the make arms are rotated at the same speed the torque required will vary from equipment to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 2002 (TRI)

Monika India Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-13-2002

Reported in: (2003)(151)ELT602TriDel

..... good fibre no mala fide intention can be attributed to the applicants so as to make them liable for penalty under section 112 of the customs act the learned advocate in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2002 (TRI)

Shriram Rayons Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-23-2002

Reported in: (2003)(151)ELT620TriDel

..... dismissed as not maintainable the appellant would have been able to cure whatever defects and make up whatever shortcomings and prosecute the appeal on its merits the dismissal of the appeal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //