Making - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: making Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.379 seconds)Shashikant S/O. Rambhau Make and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-13-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)ALLMR782; 2002(3)BomCR739
b h marlapalle j 1 this group of petitions filed under article 226 of the constitution raises the grievance regarding...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJatinder Singh Vs. Ranjit Kaur
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-30-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC784; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)352; 2001ALLMR(Cri)456(SC); 2001(1)ALT(Cri)280; 2001CriLJ1015; I(2001)DMC320SC; JT2001(2)SC198; RLW2001(2)SC294; 2001(1)SCALE431; [2001]1SCR706
k t thomas j 1 leave granted 2 the sole question is whether a complaint once dismissed by a magistrate...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of C. Ex., Allahabad Vs. Triveni Glass Limited
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-23-2001
Reported in: 2002(144)ELT5(SC)
order1 our attention has been invited by learned counsel for the appellant to the affidavit by sanjeev srivastava departmental representative...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Dintex Dyechem Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-09-2001
..... recovery thereof shall be stayed the assessees are given time upto 31 5 01 to make the deposit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.C.E., Delhi Vs. M/S. Haryana Telecom. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2001
..... of manufacture the definition in the act it would include goods which are necessary to make that production process possible it is observed that power being essential to the process of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBeml Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
Reported in: (2001)(75)ECC378
..... order in accordance with law on providign an opportunity to the party the party may make use of this oppurtunity and substantiate his claim during the re adjudication proceedings thus this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce, Madras and Cce, Guntur Vs. M/S. K.N. Chari Rubber and Plastics,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
Reported in: (2001)(135)ELT773Tri(Chennai)
..... exemption under notification no 89 79 but by reason of an exemption notification would not make printed cartons non excisable goods it was therefore held that since by included the value .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Steelco Gujarat Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
..... there is no authority for this certificate to have a validity period shri bodade here makes a very pertinent point and that its that the period of the bond filed for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. Arti Chauhan, Shri Balbir Vs. Cc, New Delhi
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
..... appellant had made compliance to the tribunal s stay order dated 17 10 2000 by making deposit of rs 1 00 000 towards the penalty amount therefore appeal no c 111 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Ksedc Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Apr-09-2001
Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC532
..... afresh in accordance with law on providign an opportunity to the party the party must make use of this opportunity and is at liberty to claim all the connected issues during .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial