Main Sequence - Judgment Search Results

S. Bala Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 61(1996)DLT122

..... justice to the great personality of swami vivekananda 2 the sequence spitting on the photograph of the maharaja facts are authentic ..... and sets are amateurish and need great improvement iv the sequence having some reference to the holy quran is unnecessary especially ..... to the dance concluding sequence the change of mood are too abrupt climax has not been built up main subject is diluted appropriate .....

Sureshchandra Agarwal and Vs. Collector of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1995)(78)ELT174TriDel

..... the next chapter pages 59 to 75 in which polishing sequences are discussed 13 the reading of these materials alongwith the ..... is primarily cutting rather than polishing they have three main applications the main function of the polishing process has been described as ..... action is primarily cutting rather than polishing they have three main applications for the final abrasive finishing of ordinary mild .....

Monarch Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1995)53ITD33(Ahd.)

..... to create the export profits reserve account were concerned regarding the sequence of deductions adjustments to be made in the computation of ..... under section 154 he withdrew the same merits apart the main dispute was whether it was a case fit for invoking ..... special leave petitions urged learned counsel stand granted against a majority of them learned counsel referred to the following decisions of .....

Minor Prahlad Ugardas Patel Oral Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1995)53TTJ(Ahd.)115

..... specific deferred trusts making them beneficiaries in the aforestated circumstances and looking to the entire sequence of events it cannot be denied that the predominant purpose behind the entire scheme ..... that decision does not in any manner support the appellant s contentions 13 therefore the main controversy namely whether the 17 appellant oral specific deferred trusts being the beneficiaries of .....

Jitendra Kumar Yadav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1996KAR1679; 1995(6)KarLJ669

..... far as one has to view it in the context and sequences of the incident very serious acts of violence and indiscipline had ..... rusticated from the institute on the ground that they were the main participants in the incident that took place certain punishments were ..... very case of the authorities that he was one of the main culprits in the unfortunate incident is without foundation learned advocate submits .....

Commissioner Vs. Schleier

Court: US Supreme Court

prior circuit decision that had in turn relied on our decision in united states v burke 504 u s 229 1992

Santi Ranjan Gangully Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1995)2CALLT154(HC),99CWN936

minimum and in this connection reference was made to the decision of the supreme court in the case of varadha rao

Delhi Fire Service Karamchari Sangh (Regd.) Vs. Municipal Corporation ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 60(1995)DLT482

to health is a fundamental human right to workmen the maintenance of health is a most imperative constitutional goal whose realisation

Tracstar Investments Limited and Vs. Gordon Woodroffe Limited and ors.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (1996)87CompCas941

..... transferees this inevitable inference has to be drawn from the sequence of events and there is no escape this inference gets ..... place with an oblique motive of depriving the petitioners being majority shareholders of sspl from having any control over the impugned ..... meet the liabilities of sspl therefore for collateral purposes the majority shareholders of sspl cannot invoke provisions of section 111 4 .....

Ashok Kumar Vs. the State (Delhi Administration)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC265; 1996CriLJ421; 1995(4)Crimes50(SC); JT1995(6)SC660; 1995(5)SCALE443; 1995Supp(3)SCC626

both courts was sound and we entirely agree with their verdict 11 on the question of sentence however we differ from day at about 9 00 a m in the same sequence the evidence of sunil kumar p w 12 the hotel