Main Sequence - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: main sequence Year: 1954 Page 1 of about 360 results (0.177 seconds)K.M. Rajagopalan Vs. State of Madras and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-1954
Reported in: AIR1954Mad1155
..... to express myself upon the main question which was argued at some length i may briefly advert to the sequence of events which led to ..... officers of the secretary of state s services that is the only main contention that has been taken by the government in the written statement ..... those whom they did not want such as the plaintiff therefore the main question that has to be decided in this suit is what .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwami Hariharanand Saraswati and ors. Vs. the Jailor I/C Dist. Jail
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-24-1954
Reported in: 1954CriLJ1317
..... there appears no controversy in regard to the facts or the sequence of events there is however a controversy as to what followed ..... approached by an outer passage adjacent to and separate from tins main sanctuary 4 it appears that the harijans smarted under the ..... the petitioners the harijans were not stopped from entering through the main gate by the petitioners while on behalf of the state it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwami Hariharanand Saraswati and ors. Vs. the Jailor I/C Dist. Jail, B ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-24-1954
Reported in: AIR1954All601
..... there appears no controversy in regard to the facts or the sequence of events there is however a controversy as to what followed ..... the petitioners the harijans were not stopped from entering through the main gate by the petitioners while on behalf of the state it ..... harijans could not uninterrupted have access to the temple through the main gate the singhadwar this was so because the santainsts in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Madras Vs. K.H. Chambers Ltd. and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-10-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Mad314
hampshire and were prepared for exportation to the state of maine the question as stated by bradley j who delivered the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohanasundaram and ors. Vs. Neelambal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-04-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Mad442
our opinion there is no warrant for this assumption the decision of the privy council reported in suleman v abdul latif
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Swadeshi Bima Co. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P., L ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-07-1954
Reported in: AIR1954All693; [1954]26ITR530(All)
part of the company s property or to construct alter maintain buildings work machinery necessary or convenient for the business of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSeetharamayya J. Vs. Sarva Chandrayya and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1954
Reported in: AIR1955AP68
died as also for his obsequies and for my future maintenance and for the purpose or annual ceremonies i have sold
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSundar Singh and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-15-1954
Reported in: AIR1955All232; 1955CriLJ898
..... of offence and another part of his action though committed in a sequence in the course of one transaction falls under another section not ..... of the provisions of section 71 penal code the argument of the majority of the judges forming the full bench was based on the ..... tottenham j expressed the view that he would have agreed with the majority view if he could persuade himself to hold that section 149 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamjanam Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-02-1954
Reported in: AIR1956SC643; 2001(49)BLJR2282; 1956CriLJ1254
had been finally and conclusively rejected with considerable emphasis and decision whatever the criminal tendencies of a man may be he from me 13 now it will be seen from this sequence of events that the first real hint or suggestion about
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKripal and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-25-1954
Reported in: AIR1954SC706
..... has apparently produced no visible injury now having regard to the sequence of the assaults the parts of the body on which the ..... reason to differ from them in their estimate thereof 5 the main stress of the learned counsel s argument was that the prosecution ..... safe enough to support the convictions of these appellants 5 the main stress of the learned counsel s argument was that the prosecution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial