Main Sequence - Judgment Search Results

K. Jagannadha Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1519; 1981LabIC1096; (1981)IILLJ252SC; 1981(3)SCALE1079; (1981)3SCC604; [1982]1SCR69; 1981(2)SLJ234(SC); 1981(13)LC601(SC)

..... and regulated in accordance with a roster main tained for this purpose which shall follow the following sequence namely promotee direct recruit promotee direct ..... 3 which is also a state service as category 2 the main ground on which the length of the past service for which ..... l untawalia p s kailasam e s venkataramaiah jj and himself majority view i a consideration of certain historic facts in this case .....

The India Jute Co. Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Collector, Central Excise an ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1981LC545D(Calcutta)

weight of staple fibre when mixed with cotton 12 the main contention of the petitioner is that the products manufactured by

Diamond Vs. Diehr

Court: US Supreme Court

..... development of a desired output from a given input a sequence of formulas and or algebraic logical steps to calculate or ..... developing and applying the function of a machine doctrine the majority acknowledged that the doctrine had originated with decisions of this ..... was patentable subject matter under 101 id at 771 the majority dismissed benson with the observation that benson involved only process .....

Jeevanlal (1929) Limited and ors. Vs. Controlling Authority Under the ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1982)ILLJ86Mad

in the result this writ petition has to fail the main contention of the petitioner before the controlling authority as well

Smt. Amiya Debi and ors. Vs. Ranendra Narayan Saha and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1983Cal24

one of limitation but more fundamentally of one relating to maintainability the answer in each case would depend entirely upon the given by the plaintiff would be of no legal coa sequence and the same would be mere sue plusage 13 mr

Kandaswami Gounder Vs. T. Subramania Gounder

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1982)1MLJ193

in may view this is the correct procedure citing this decision the counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the observation

Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamilnadu-iii Vs. Southern Sea Foods (P.) ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1982)31CTR(Mad)23; [1983]140ITR855(Mad)

737 is not an expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for maintenance of any branch office or agency in any foreign country of a contract but for procuring firm orders in the sequence of acts connected with any contract formation of the contract

Manohar Lal and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1981CriLJ1373

victim at a much earlier date and pursuant to that decision he or she keeps on administering poison to the victim as a chastised man and stop giving her maltreatment the sequence of events shows that even if ram rakhi appellant threw

Rowan Cos., Inc. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

per man to engage a caterer who provided meals and maintained living quarters on a vessel moored alongside the drilling rig retained the definition of wages ibid in view of this sequence of consistency the plain language of the statutes is strong

Ramesan Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1981CriLJ451

to the reliability or unreliability of that evidence the above decision has been followed in sirkar v raman nayar 27 cochin a plea of guilty in a case where the natural sequence would be a sentence of death the learned judge proceeded