Main Sequence - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: main sequence Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 480 results (0.184 seconds)Mahesh Harilal Khamar Vs. B.N. Narasimhan and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-03-1982
Reported in: AIR1982Guj298; (1982)2GLR124
..... all the relevant facts on the record of this case the sequence of events as chronologically mentioned in the earlier part of this ..... b of the petition i will have therefore to consider the main and the only relevant question which is posed for my consideration ..... first respondent has arbitrarily and without applying his mind to the main question before him has thrown out the appeal as time barred .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Muzaffar HussaIn Iqbal Hussain
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-03-1982
Reported in: (1983)3ITD559(All.)
1 this is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the aac special range kanpur 2 the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Safety Glass Works Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Excise and Cust ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-12-1982
Reported in: 1991(33)LC306(Calcutta)
facts and also by reiterating the stand taken in the main writ petition 6 it appears from the affidavit in opposition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.S. Palaniappa Chettiar Vs. A. Simen George
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-1982
Reported in: (1983)2MLJ354
averred in his petition for eviction that he is not maintaining good health for the last few years and is often
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajinder Kumar Sood Vs. the State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-24-1982
Reported in: 1983CriLJ1338
both the contradictions could be considered hardly material to the main prosecution case which was that when the complainant approached the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSavera and Co. Ltd. Vs. Fabulous SkIn Supply Co.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-10-1982
Reported in: [1985]58CompCas227(Cal)
the application for the appointment of provisional liquidator is not maintainable at this stage reference is made to section 450 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTingersoll Rand Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-06-1982
Reported in: (1983)4ITD654(Mum.)
ruling we have to decide the issue independently 19 the main test to be applied shri dastur stated is to see
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.S. Nakara and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-17-1982
Reported in: AIR1983SC130; 1983(31)BLJR122; (1983)ILLJ104SC; 1982(2)SCALE1213; (1983)1SCC305; [1983]2SCR165; 1983(1)SLJ131(SC)
category within the scope of provisions of a law to maintain its constitutionality 42 the last submission the absence of precedent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPremier Cable Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on: Mar-20-1982
Reported in: (1982)1ITD1064(Coch.)
is a valid assessment order in the light of the decision of the supreme court cited above we may point out succeeding referred to in section 80j 2 would be the sequence of the assessment years which follow from year to year
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPawittar Singh Walia Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-19-1982
Reported in: (1984)ILLJ408P& H
..... not to be treated to mean that he was an inefficient officer in the same sequence the argument is that such average reports not having been communicated to the petitioner the ..... of the sort it was further observed as follows it seems to us that the main object of this rule is to instill a spirit of dedication and dynamism in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial