Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act 1996 section 2 definitions Page 12 of about 1,291 results (0.396 seconds)

Jan 07 2009 (HC)

Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare Limited and Horlicks Limited and a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT330

..... to section 20 of the code.19. principle of 'forum non-convenience' was, referred to by a single judge of this court in ansal buildwell ltd. v. north eastern indira gandhi institute of health and medical science reported in ilr (2005) delhi 751 in a petition dealing with section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 and section20 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2010 (SC)

Oswal Fats and Oils Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner (Administratio ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2010(3)SC510

..... 21 of that judgment read as under:for many centuries, indian society cherished two basic values of life i.e., `satya' (truth) and `ahimsa' (non-violence). mahavir, gautam buddha and mahatma gandhi guided the people to ingrain these values in their daily life. truth constituted an integral part of justice delivery system which was in vogue in pre-independence era and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2011 (HC)

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Mr Chintamani Rao and ors

Court : Delhi

..... less identical in their material part. india tv claims that it launched its news channel india tv in march, 2004. since its launch, it has become one of the leading hindi news channel in india. it is claimed that its channel has very high viewership ratings. it is claimed that its programmes such as india beats, jago india, apki adalat, sab ..... purpose of reporting. as regards the issue of quantitative use of the plaintiffs works (i.e., the works of super cassettes and yashraj films) it is submitted that a hindi cinematographic film is of duration of about 3 hours or 180 minutes, and the defendant (india tv) uses the same for a few seconds or at best for a minute .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2012 (SC)

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

..... pravin pandurang sawant police indian (naik)143 kunal prakash jaiswani civilian indian144 ransale gilbert civilian indian santhumayor145 ijas abdul karupadan civilian indian kuddi146 nilesh mahendra gandhi civilian indian147 prakash satan bharwani civilian indian148 ramchandra selumadhav civilian indian nair149 bharat sasuprasad gujar civilian indian150 rasika krushna sawant civilian indian151 mohd. parvez aslam ..... that his house at faridkot had been taken by his father who earned his livelihood by plying carts. kasab was fond of watching tv and hindi movies; he named a number of popular indian films that he had seen many times. he was in the habit of chewing tobacco. he ..... day she had found that the appellant had no difficulty in following or speaking in hindi; thus, the interaction between the magistrate and the appellant took place, in question and answer form, in simple, everyday spoken hindi. the magistrate, having satisfied herself that the police had no contact with the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2010 (HC)

Shri Rohit Shekhar Vs. Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari and anr.

Court : Delhi

1. The plaintiff by this application seeks a direction to the first defendant to furnish blood samples for enabling the DNA testing.2. Briefly, the facts are that the plaintiff claims a decree for declaration that the first defendant is his biological father. The second defendant (hereafter referred to as Ujjawala Sharma) is the plaintiffs mother. Apparently, he (first defendant) was a Member of Parliament during the period 1967-1980. It is contended that Ujjawala Sharma was active in politics and involved in activities of All India Young Woman Congress apart from her job as Sanskrit Lecturer at Daulat Ram College. The plaintiff also contends that Ujjawala Sharma was previously married to Sh. B.P. Sharma from whom she was estranged. Apparently, she and her husband Sh. B.P. Sharma had a son Siddhartha Sharma. The plaintiff contends that the first defendant did not have any child from his marriage, and, as he was very fond of Ujjawala Sharma and even wanted to marry her, he convinced her...

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 2009 (SC)

State of West Bengal and anr. Vs. West Bengal Regn. Copy Writers Assn. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(8)SC531; 2009(7)SCALE164; 2009(7)LC3482(SC)

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment will dispose of SLP(Civil) No. 9921 of 2007, SLP(Civil) No. 10191 of 2007 and SLP(Civil) No. 12048 of 2007.2. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.3. In all these appeals, the common judgment passed by the Calcutta High Court, allowing W.P.S.T. No. 826 of 2001, W.P.S.T. No. 1312 of 2001 and W.P.S.T. No. 15 of 2002, is in challenge.4. In those Writ Petitions filed before the High Court, a common judgment dated 22.6.2001 passed by the West Bengal State Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter called `the Tribunal' for short) in T.A. No. 391 of 1998, T.A. No. 392 of 1998, O.A. No. 2377 of 1999 and O.A. No. 4636 of 1999, dismissing all the original applications, was in challenge. The High Court has set aside the order of the Tribunal and allowed the original applications. While doing so, the High Court has also granted certain reliefs. The State of West Bengal being aggrieved by the same, has come up before us.5. Initially, before the High Court o...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2003 (HC)

M.K. JaIn and ors. Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2004All33

ORDERSunil Ambwani, J.1. Meerut-Bijnor route lies partly within the jurisdiction of Regional Transport Authority (in short referred to as 'R.T.A.'), Meerut, and partly within the jurisdiction of R.T.A., Moradabad. There are 83 permit holders on Meerut-Bijnor route for operating stage carriages. Another inter regional route namely Muzaffarnagar-Bijnor route is traversed by 38 permit holders of stage carriage operating private transport vehicles. A scheme was proposed under Section 68-C of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (in short 'Old Act') covering Muzaffarnagar-Bijnor route, which was confirmed under Section 68-D of the Old Act and was notified on 5-11-1977. This notified Muzaffarnagar-Bijnor route passed through Bhope-Morna-Rawalighat for reaching Bijnor, and crossed river Ganges by Pentoon bridge at Rawalighat. The other route namely Meerut-Bijnor passed through Mawana-Behsuma-Ramraj-Dharapur-Bidur Kuti for reaching Bijnor. This other route was not notified route, and crossed river Gan...

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 2010 (HC)

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

..... cassettes'. the plaintiff also asserts that it has a large repertoire of cinematographic films and sound recordings. it claims that its repertoire of music includes collection of over 20,000 hindi non-film songs and around 50,000 songs in regional languages. the plaintiff also claims that it has launched and/or promoted some of the biggest, and most talented as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2012 (SC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Air Craft Employees Coop.Society L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... judgments in commissioner, hindu religious endowments v. sri lakshmindra thirtha swamiar of sri shirur mutt (supra), mahant sri jagannath ramanuj das v. state of orissa (1954) scr 1046, ratilal panachand gandhi v. state of bombay (1954) scr 1055, h.h. sadhundra thirtha swamiar v. commissioner for hindu religious and charitable endowments 1963 supp (2) scr 302, corporation of calcutta v. liberty .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1998 (HC)

Haryana Urban Development Authority Vs. Smt. Raj Dulhari and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1998P& H283; (1998)119PLR757

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The all important question that arises for adjudication in this petition filed by the Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter described as HUDA) for quashing the orders passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chandigarh (for short, the District Forum) and the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Union Territory, Chandigarh (for short, the State Commission) is whether the District Forum could direct the allotment of a residential plot to respondent No. 1 even though draw of lots was not held by the competent authority due to non-availability of land and pending litigation.2. The facts necessary for deciding the above question are that in pursuance of advertisements issued by the Chief Administrator, HUDA in 1984, 1280 persons including respondent No. 1 submitted applications for allotment of 10-marla plots in Sector 23, Urban Estate, Faridabad. However, draw of lots could not be held due to pending of two-prolonged litigation, one between...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //