Court : Mumbai Nagpur
oral judgment: (anoop v. mohta, j.) 1. rule, returnable forthwith. heard finally by consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. the petitioner was rusticated therefore, this petition. mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act, 1996 (for short the said act ) provides for dispute settlement mechanism in sections 32, 33 and 34 for the students in disciplinary cases which are reproduced as under: .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1950Ori28
Das, J.1. The defendant is the appellant in this second appeal. The suit relates to an institution called Sri Biranshi Narayan Muth at Buguda, Ghumsur Taluk, Ganjam District. As appears from the connected civil Revisions Nos. 169/47 and 8/48 which have been heard with this appeal there appears to be some reasonable doubt whether this institution is a Muth or a temple. But so far as this appeal is concerned, it has proceeded on the assumption put forward by the plaintiff in his plaint that it is a Muth. This has not been traversed by the defendant in his written statement. The plaintiff's case is that the defendant is the Mahant of the Muthand that he is his duly constituted Chela and that his residence in the Math has been made impossible by the wrong conduct of the defendant and that he is denied even food and raiment and that he has had to leave the Muth in 1930. He accordingly asserts a right to be maintained out of the Muth funds and brings the suit against the defendant as the hea...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1953Ori121
Jagannadhadas, C.J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution by the petitioner who is the proprietor of Madhupur Estate in Cuttack district, against the State of Orissa and the Court of Wards of the Orissa State, as well as against the Deputy Collector in charge of the Wards Estate. The State Government by virtue of the powers conferred on it under Section 16, Orissa Court of Wards Act, 1947, issued notification No. 9876/R dated the 7th December 1951, in the Revenue Department declaring the petitioner a disqualified proprietor under Section 10 (f) (iv) of the said Act and published the same in the Orissa Gazette in accordance with the provision of Section 21 of the Act. The Court of Wards assumed superintendence of the Madhupur Estate by virtue of the said notification on the 8th December 1951. Since then, the Estate has been under the management of the Court of Wards. The petitioner has accordingly come forward with this application dated the 5th March 1952, chal...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1953Ori185
Jagannadha Das, C.J.1. These are applications under Article 226 of the Constitution lor the issue of mandatory writs against the State of Orissa restraining them from issuing any notifications or taking any other steps under the Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1 of 1952, in so far as the estates to which these applications relate. These eight applications concern eight per-manently settled estates of the ex-Madras area, which since 1-4-1936, became part of the then newly formed State of Orissa. All the applications involve substantially the same questions and are therefore dealt with together. 2. The trend of economic and political thought of the nation has insisted upon the abolition of Zamindari tenure and the elimination of intermediaries between the State and the cultivator as the first step in any general measure of agrarian reform. It has been considered that concentration of large blocks of land in the hands of a limited number of Zamindars denying fair distribution thereof to the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1956Ori156
Panigrahi, C.J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiffs-respondents for declaration of their sole right to collect, remove, and sell Kendu leaves from inside the borders of the Garloisingh Zamindarl in Sambalpur district, and for recovery of a sum of Rs. 88200/- from the defendants for 'wrongful collection and removal' of the same during the years 1944 to 1946.The plaintiffs also prayed for an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their right to collect Kendu leaves in future, for the period covered by the contract entered into between the plaintiffs and the deceased Zamindar, Madan Mohan Singh. Defendant 1 is a lessee from defendant 2 who is the present Zamindar of Garloisingh. The father of defendant 2 executed a document, Ex. 19 datEd 29-1-1938, in favour of plaintiffs 1 and 2 permitting them to collect and remove kendu leaves within the ambits of his Zamindari for a period of 15 years commencing from 1944.The plaintiffs agreed to pay an annu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1961Ori180
..... attesting witness. it is with the background that their lordships have held that the witnesses must see execution and must subscribe as witnesses.on this point, another case in chandratan gandhi v. sm. jarmma bai, air 1946 cal 168, was cited before us. the facts of that case are entirely different. there, the witness did nothing more than explaining the will .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Communist Party v. SACB - 367 U.S. 1 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Communist Party v. SACB, 367 U.S. 1 (1961) Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board No 12 Argued October 11-12, 1960 Decided June 5, 1961 367 U.S. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus After very extensive hearings under the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950, the Board, in 1953, found that the Communist Party of the United States was a "Communist action organization," within the meaning of the Act, and ordered it to register as such under 7. A remand of the case by this Court, 351 U. S. 115 , and a second remand by the Court of Appeals led to further proceedings before the Board, involving rulings on additional procedural points and two reconsiderations of the entire record, following which the Board adhered to its conclusion. After denial of motions made by the Party under 14(a) and after review on the mer...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : [1998]231ITR318(Delhi); [1998]97TAXMAN144(Delhi)
..... of west bengal v. subodh gopal bose : [1954]1scr587 .2. kharak singh v. state of u.p. : 1963crilj329 .3. rustom cavasjee cooper v. union of india : [1970]3scr530 .4. maneka gandhi (smt.) v. union of india : [1978]2scr621 .5. state of himachal pradesh v. umed ram sharma : [1986]1scr251 .6. supreme court legal aid committee representing undertrial prisoners v. union of ..... allegations in the counter-affidavit.on march 30, 1995, mr. sanjay gupta filed an affidavit on behalf of the petitioners stating that in respect of property bearing no. 9, kasturba gandhi marg, where the apparent consideration was rs. 7.20 crores and the application in from no. 37-i was filed on november 28, 1994, no objection certificate was granted and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1970SC2097; (1970)2SCC567; [1971]2SCR197
..... panicky they are could be seen from the scurrilous writings of one of their lieutenants tarakeshwari sinha openly threatening that the syndicate will fight and defeat indira gandhi. these unscrupulous bosses prefer that the congress should suffer a crushing defeat in the next general elections in 1972 rather than that our prime minister becomes stronger ..... of the respondent in general, with the consent and connivance of the respondent published by free distribution a pamphlet, annexure a-38 to the petition, in hindi and english, in cyclostyled form as well as in printed form in which serious allegations, as already noted, were made amounting to the commission of undue ..... dharia and shri s.m. banerji, with the consent or the connivance of the returned candidate, published by free distribution a pamphlet, annexure a-38, in hindi and english, in cyclostyled form as well as in printed form, in which very serious allegations were made which amounted to undue influence within the meaning of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1
..... the constitution bears the imprint of the philosophy of our national movement for swaraj. that philosophy was shaped by two pre-eminent leaders of the movement- mahatma gandhi and jawaharlal nehru. mahatma gandhi gave to the movement the philosophy of ahimsa. two essential elements of his ahimsa are : (1) equality; and (2) absence of the desire ..... and socially it must mean the ending of all special class privileges and vested interests. jawaharlal nehru whither india, 1933. 1930. the philosophy of mahatma gandhi was rooted in our ancient tradition; the philosophy of jawaharlal nehru was influenced by modern progressive thinking. but the common denominator in their philosophies was ..... constitution drawn by the people. after the end of world war ii the demand was put forward very strongly by the indian leaders including mahatma gandhi. sir stratford cripps representing britain had also accepted the idea that an elected body of indians should frame the indian constitution.(the facts have .....
Tag this Judgment!