Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (2005)139PLR400
..... the tenant to continue in possession of the premises after the termination of the term because of the great difficulty of their obtaining an alternative accommodation.39. in madhubhai amathalal gandhi v. union of india9 a.i.r. 1961 s.c. 21,there was a challenge to the notification dated 31.8.1957 issued under section 4 of the securities contracts ..... bombay, a.i.r. 1961 s.c. 4;(vi) p.j. irani v. state of madras and anr., a.i.r. 19061 s.c. 1731;(vii) madhu lal amath lal gandhi v. union of india, a.i.r. 1961 s.c. 21;(viii) hindustan lever v. hindustan lever mazdoor sabha, 1994 suppl. 1 s.c.c. 1;(ix) u.p. avas .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (2005)139PLR238
..... has been recognized and accepted as the representative of 'public interest'. his status in this regard has been duly explained by the apex court in the case of adi pherozshah gandhi v. h.m. seeravi, advocate general of maharashtra, bombay, a.i.r. 1971 s.c. 385. certainly being the conscious keeper of the 'public interest', it is the prerogative of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1998P& H283; (1998)119PLR757
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The all important question that arises for adjudication in this petition filed by the Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter described as HUDA) for quashing the orders passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chandigarh (for short, the District Forum) and the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Union Territory, Chandigarh (for short, the State Commission) is whether the District Forum could direct the allotment of a residential plot to respondent No. 1 even though draw of lots was not held by the competent authority due to non-availability of land and pending litigation.2. The facts necessary for deciding the above question are that in pursuance of advertisements issued by the Chief Administrator, HUDA in 1984, 1280 persons including respondent No. 1 submitted applications for allotment of 10-marla plots in Sector 23, Urban Estate, Faridabad. However, draw of lots could not be held due to pending of two-prolonged litigation, one between...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1999P& H43; (1998)120PLR454
..... the teacher; -education is god incarnate; education secures honour at the hands of the state, not money, a man without education is equal to animal.' 2. father of the nation mahatma gandhi and the great philosophers, thinkers and educationists like our presidents late dr. s. radhakrishnan and late dr. zakir husssain gave clarion call for educating indian masses. this is also one .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR2009NOC2988(F.B)(P&H)
1. Hearing this petition, has been an experience of sorts. Sentiments and emotions were on a high. We were under an international scanner. Letters were addressed to the members of the bench individually, as well as, collectively. A lot of these letters came from overseas. Some of the communications were addressed to the Chief Justice of this Court, and were forwarded to us for our consideration. The media covered the hearings from day to day, and in doing so, reported the issues canvassed, as it perceived them. The issue under the scanner was an aspect of a religious belief i.e. whether maintaining hair unshorn is an essential/important tenet of the Sikh religion. Based on media projections, individual sentimentalities were aroused. Depending on what was reported, reaction of readers, who thronged the court, varied from day to day. Intellectuals, Sikh scholars, and preachers of the Sikh religion, attended court proceeding, to have a first hand account of what was going on. While not ag...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (2003)133PLR579
..... regard can be placed on a judgment of this court in case of om parkash v. shiv dutt sharma, 1991(1) r.c.r. 395: sarjit singh v. gian singh gandhi, (1990-2)98 p.l.r. 355 and d hem raj v. ramesh kamar khosla, (1994-3)108 p.l.r. 108. 23. the view of the rent controller that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
HEMANT GUPTA, J. The petitioners i.e. the vendors of the sale deeds executed in respect of land measuring 59 Acres 1 Kanal 19 Marlas in the year 2000, have sought to annul such sale deeds in the present writ petition. The brief facts out of which the present writ petition arisesare that the State Government has initially published a notification dated 07.07.1998 (Annexure R-1) under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') intending to acquire land measuring 122 Acres 2 Kanals 7 Marlas for a public purpose namely for setting up the 'Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Faridkot' (for short the University). After such notification was published, the landowners entered into agreements with the State Government for sale of such land. One of the such agreements is annexed as Annexure P-4 (dated 29.07.1999), wherein the landowners agreed to sell their shares of property to the State Government at the rate of Rs.4,50,000/- per acre for the purpose of establishin...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (2008)149PLR389
..... the area greener. large dams can also become instruments in improving the environment, as has been the case of western rajasthan, which transformed into a green area because of indira gandhi canal which draws water from bhakra nangal dam. this project not only allows the farmers to grow crops in deserts but also checks the spread of thar desert in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (2008)152PLR143
Permod Kohli, J.1. Invoking revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 15(5)of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), landlady has filed this Revision challenging the findings recorded by the Rent Controller, Faridkot and the Appellate Authority dismissing the eviction petition. It is necessary to briefly refer to the facts on record.2. The petitioner-landlady (hereinafter referred to as 'the landlady') filed Eviction Petition under Section 13 of the Act against Respondents No. 1 and 2 are the tenants in the shop and gallery situated in Moti Bhur Bazar, Kotkapura bearing Municipal No. B-VI/97. The premises was purchased by the landlady and her husband's brother Sunil Kumar respondent No. 3 in the Eviction Petition from S.S. Jain Sabha. Respondents No. 1 and 2 were tenants under Jain Sabha and after the purchase of property by the landlady and Sunil Kumar, they have attorned them as landlord.3. The landlady filed the Eviction Pe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (2009)156PLR489
Surya Kant, J.1. The Chandigarh Administration has filed this writ petition purportedly in public interest, seeking permission for medical termination of the pregnancy of a mentally retarded girl [the name withheld and here-in-after referred to as the victim], who was previously an inmate of the Nari Niketan, Sector 26, Chandigarh and has presently been shifted to Ashreya - a Home for the mentally challenged, located in Sector 47, Chandigarh. The medical termination of pregnancy of the victim has been sought on the strength of the medical opinion dated 27.5.2009 given by the Multidisciplinary Medical Board of the Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh.2. The following facts would unfold the pathetic story of physical and mental abuse of a hapless girl in a Government-run Institute:[a] The victim, an orphan, was under the guardianship of New Delhi Missionary of Charity till 28th December, 1998. It appears that as per the records maintained by the Missionary of Ch...
Tag this Judgment!