Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act 1996 section 2 definitions Page 1 of about 1,291 results (0.205 seconds)

Rajeev Kumar Suman S/O Kedarnath Prasad Vs. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtr ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

oral judgment: (anoop v. mohta, j.) 1. rule, returnable forthwith. heard finally by consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. the petitioner was rusticated therefore, this petition. mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act, 1996 (for short the said act ) provides for dispute settlement mechanism in sections 32, 33 and 34 for the students in disciplinary cases which are reproduced as under: .....

People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) Vs. University of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 149(2008)DLT626

..... other literature in various subjects of social sciences in hindi medium. the ugc accordingly constituted a five member committee headed by professor g. gopinathan of mahatma gandhi antrrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya. the committee examined the objects underlying the establishment of the directorate of hindi medium implementation, its functions and the difficulties faced in ..... by the directorate clearly supported the publication of basic textbooks in emerging areas by either asking the scholars to write original text books in hindi or to translate the books from english and other indian foreign languages. the relevant portion of the recommendation, in this regard, was as ..... and perused the record. there are two distinct facets of the controversy raised in this writ petition, one relating to the introduction of hindi medium of instructions for different courses and the other relating to the infrastructure including literature needed for imparting such instructions. from the affidavits placed .....

Madhu Kishwar and Others Vs. State of Bihar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)137; AIR1996SC1864; JT1996(4)SC379; 1996(3)SCALE640; (1996)5SCC125; [1996]Supp1SCR442

..... of the act exclude woman tribals from inheritance to the khuntkutti raiyati rights solely on the basis of sex and confine succession and inheritance among male descendants only. in maneka gandhi v. union of india, : [1978]2scr621 , this court held that reasonableness is an essential element of equality; non-arbitrariness pervades article 14. the court must consider the direct and inevitable ..... held that the prohibition under article 14 is to secure all persons against arbitrary laws as well as arbitrary application of laws. it applies to procedural and substantive law. menaka gandhi v. union of india, : [1978]2scr621 , reiterates its creed on grounds of justice, equity and fairness lest law becomes void, oppressive, unjust and unfair.19. eugine smith in his indian .....

Gujarat Housing Board Vs. Kalpeshkumar Naranbhai Patel

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)3GLR92

H.K. Rathod, J.1. In Special Civil Application No.6175/1999, this Court has heard Mr.S.B.Pandit, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitoner - Gujarat Housing Board and Mr.R.M.Chauhan, learned AGP appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5 so also Mr.B.S.Patel, learned advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4.This Court has also heard Mr.R.M.Chauhan, learned AGP appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.B.S.Patel, learned advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3 in Special Civil Application No.5274/1999.2. So far as Special Civil Application No.6175/1999 is concerned, this Court has issued RULE on 20th August, 1999 and also issued notice as to interim relief returnable on 16th September, 1999. However, during the interim period, by way of ad-interim relief upto 16th Sept.,1999 has stayed the operation and implementation of the impugned order at Annexure-A dated 13th January, 1999, subject to conditions that the petitioner shall not allot, dispose of or otherwise, deal with the propert...

Syndicate of the Press of the Universtiy of Cambridge on Behalf of the ...

Court : Delhi

..... are structured on the pattern of question paper of english for each year. the books, at the beginning, contain syllabus for each year and also contain translation from english to hindi and punjabi. before reproducing some of the exercises, the respondents have given their own introduction to the units. the respondents have given the same answers, as in the key at .....

The Aligarh Muslim University Through Its Vice-chancellor Vs. Malay Sh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC992

..... its legislative field fundamentally altering or changing with retrospective, curative or neutralising effect the conditions on which such decision is based. as pointed out by ray, cj. in indira nehru gandhi v. raj narain, the rendering ineffective of judgments or orders of competent courts and tribunals by changing their basis by legislative enactment is a well-known pattern of all validating ..... be said that the right under article 29(2) are not effected when an institution which is receiving aid is declared as minority. the apex court in : [1975]3scr810 the gandhi faiz-e-am college v. university of agra and anr., has held that abridgement of the constitutional right is as obnoxious as annihilation. even if the right of citizens under .....

R.S. Jiwani Vs. Ircon International Ltd., a Government of India

Court : Mumbai

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. The Law of Arbitration was earlier governed by Indian Arbitration Act, 1899. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 also provided for arbitration as Special Proceedings in the following terms:89. Arbitration. (1) Save in so far as is otherwise provided by the Indian Arbitration Act, 1899; or by any other law for the time being in force, all references to arbitration whether by an order in suit or otherwise, and all proceedings there under, shall be governed by the provisions contained in the Second Schedule.(2) The provisions of the Second Schedule shall not affect any arbitration pending at the commencement of this Code, but shall apply to any arbitration after that date under any agreement or reference made before the commencement of this Code.The said provision however, was repealed by Section 49 and Schedule III of Arbitration Act (10 of 1940). The Arbitration Act of 1940 itself was repealed by Section 85 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter...

Tika Ram and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC1; 2009(12)SCALE349; (2009)10SCC689:2009AIRSCW6465

..... india ltd. v. collector of central excise (cited supra), bakhtawar trust v. m.d. narayan and ors. (cited supra), madan mohan pathak v. union of india (cited supra), indira gandhi v. raj narayan (cited supra), virender singh hooda v. state of haryana (cited supra), i.n. saxena v. state of madhya pradesh (cited supra) and janpad sabha v. c.p ..... s case (cited supra). of course, this case pertains to the taxing statutes. we do not find anything contrary in the other decisions, namely, s.r. bhagwat's and indira gandhi's case (both cited supra) to which we have already made reference. the other cases, namely, virender singh hooda's case, i.m. saxena's case, and janpad sabha' ..... court has correctly dealt with this question. it firstly considered the law laid down in the cases of kraipak v. union of india reported in : air 1970 sc 150; maneka gandhi v. union of india reported in : air 1978 sc 597 and olga tellis v. bombay municipal corporation reported in : air 1986 sc 180 as also in union of india .....

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

..... of the same composition as was the composition of the chemicals in the explosives seized from the deceased terrorists at parliament house. it, thus, stands established that premises a-97, gandhi vihar were let out to accused mohd. afzal. he was in legal and physical possession thereof. it stands established that the chemicals which were recovered from the premises were used ..... not know what was inside the jars but the contents thereof were told to him by the police. he sstate d that he could not read english but could read hindi. he sstate d that seizure memos prepared by the police were read over to him before he had signed the same.60. pw-37, prem chand deposed that he was ..... the taped conversation. on the same day at about 8.00 p.m. a call was found coming on phone no. 9811573506 and this was also taped. the conversation, in hindi, was between a man named shaukat and a woman. he seized the two cassettes on which the two conversation were taped, being exhibit pw-66/1 and pw-66/2 .....

Jer Rutton Kavasmanek and anr. Vs. Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

..... letter dated 6.6.2001 wherein, in response to transfer notices issued as a result of transfer requests from mr.daruwalla and mr.gandhi, he refers to 'the recent turn of events' (i.e the defeat of resolution of 5.5.2001) and says he ..... shares; 7. first respondent's letter dated 16th march 1992 forwarding copies of transfer notices regarding mr.c.h.gandhi for trasfer of 10 shares, mr.noshir k. warden for 100 shares and mr.dhiru n. desai for 200 shares; 8. rejection ..... the articles of association; 5. transfer of 22 shares by madons is bad; 6. three fresh transfer notices given by mr.c.h.gandhi for transfer of ten shares; mr.noshir k. warden for transfer of 100 shares and mr.dhiru n. desai for transfer of 200 ..... received two transfer notices dated 17th may 2001 and 28th may 2001 respectively from its membmers mr.b.e.daruwalla and mr.s.c.gandhi, which were circulated amongst all its members under article 57 of the of respondent no.1 (this was after the aforesaid resolution dated .....