Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act 1996 section 2 definitions Court: chennai Page 1 of about 50 results (0.165 seconds)

Oct 21 1998 (HC)

Bharathidasan University, Palkalai Perur, Tiruchirapalli Rep. by Its R ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC236; (2001)8SCC676; AIR2001SC2861

ORDERJudgement Pronounced by Shivaraj Patil, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. In these appeals, in the tight of the contentions raised by the parties, the only question that needs to be answered is, whether Bharathidasan University, Palkalai Perur, Tiruchirappalli in this State of Tamil Nadu, should seek approval of AH India Council for Technical Education to start technicalcourses in the University or to start a Technical Institute to conduct technical courses. For convenience, hereafter we will refer to the said University as 'University' and the All India Council for Technical Education as 'Council'.3. Writ Appeal No.1308 of 1998 is filed by the University and Bharathidasan Institute for Engineering and Technology. Writ Appeal No.1309 of 1998 is filed by a student, who was respondent No.4, impleaded in the Writ Petition No.14558 of 1998 and Writ Appeal No.1326 of 1998 is filed by another student, who was not a party in the writ petition, but after seeking leave from...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2007 (HC)

Ramgopal Estates Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Managing Director K.S. Hemanth Kum ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC369

..... ) naraindas indurkhya v. state of m.p. : [1974]3scr624 , (iv) common cause, a regd. society v. union of india 1996 (6) scc 667, (v) u.n.r. rao v. indra gandhi 1997 (2) scc 63, (vi) india drugs & pharmaceutical limited v. punjab drugs manufacturers' assn. : air1999sc1626 , (vii) pu. myllai hlychho v. state of mizoram : (2005)2scc92 and (viii) satyanarain shukla v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2006 (HC)

Pon Paramaguru, Director General of Police (Retd.) Vs. State of Tamil ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(2)CTC241; (2006)3MLJ129

..... that if competent legislation is enacted as visualised in article 327 the commission cannot shake himself free from the enacted prescriptions. after all, as mathew, j. has observed in indira gandhi : [1976]2scr347 :in our opinion of some of the judges constituting the majority in bharati's case : air1973sc1461 (supra) rule of law is a basic structure of the constitution apart .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1998 (HC)

M/S. Gordon Woodroffe and Company Limited, Uk, Rutland House, 44, Maso ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas582(Mad); 1998(3)CTC589

ORDER1. All these eight appeals arise out of the orders passed by the Company Law Board, Principal Bench, New Delhi in two company petitions, namely, C.P.No. 45 of 1993 and C.P.No. 16 of 1994, dated 12.5.1998.2. C.M.A.Nos. 1071, 1207, 1208 and 1210 of 1998 are preferred against the order in C.P.No.16 of 1994, while C.M.A.Nos.1072, 1073, 1149 and 1209 are preferred against the order in C.P.No.45 of 1993. The main dispute relates to the affairs of M/s. Gordon Woodroffe & Company Limited (GWL), a sick company now before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) In C.M.A.No.1071 of 1998, M/s. Gordon Woodroffe & Company Limited, U.K. the petitioner in C.P.No.16 of 1994 is the appellant. In C.M.A.No.1207 of 1998, Kishore Rajaram Chhabria, Madan Dwarakdas Chhabria and Rajaram Dwarakdas Chhabria, the respondents 4 to 6 in C.P.No.16 of 1994 are the appellants. In C.M.A.No.1208 of 1998, Tracstar Investments (P) Ltd., the second respondent in C.P.No.16 of 1994 is the appellant....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2013 (HC)

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

..... the writ petition.23. denying the averments contained in the counter affidavit filed by the respondents 2 and 3 and based on the averments in the reply affidavit, mr.r.gandhi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that the market value of the said land is more than rs.3 crores. since the lands are abutting erode-karur highways road ..... .275/4, 278/3, 278/8 and 278/9, solakalipalayam, chenna sumuthram village, kodumudi taluk, erode district. for petitioner : mr.r.gandhi, sr. counsel for m/s.v.s.sivasundaram for respondents : mr.jayesh b dolia order mr.r.gandhi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of lands in survey nos.275/4, 278/3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2011 (HC)

Ms.Dorothy Thomas Vs. Mr.Rex Arul

Court : Chennai

1. Pending suit for a declaration that the final order dated 1.11.2010 passed by the Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia, USA in Civil Action File No. 10-1-8238-48, to the extent that it deals with issues of custody of the minor child Rhea Immaculate Arul, aged about 4 years is inconclusive, unenforceable, null and void and not binding on the plaintiff and the minor child and for consequential decrees of permanent injunction, the plaintiff, who is the mother of the minor child, came up with 3 applications, viz., (i) O.A.No.191 of 2011 seeking an interim order of injunction restraining the respondent  father from in any manner seeking to enforce the said order of the Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia, in so far as the custody of the minor child is concerned (ii) O.A.No.192 of 2011, seeking an interim order of injunction restraining the defendant from in any manner publishing any defamatory or derogatory material, lowering the reputation of the plaintiff in...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 2008 (HC)

M. Haridass and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ1174

ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. In all these cases the common issue involved relates to the challenge of G.O.Ms. No. 139, Industries (MIG-2) Department, dated 03.11.2006 and the consequential acquisition proceedings initiated in terms of the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (Tamil Nadu Act 10/1999) and consequently to forbear the respondents from proceeding with the land acquisition pursuant to the G.O. in respect of the respective lands of the petitioners. In some of the cases declaration under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Act 10/1999 has been passed and published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette. 2. In all these cases, the respective petitioners are owning approved housing plots, running shops, running small industries etc, in respect of various portions of the land situated in Oragadam Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Chingleput District. As it is stated in some of the cases, enquiry notice issued under Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Act...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2009 (HC)

Association of Management of Private Colleges Represented by Its Presi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ1162

ORDERM. Jaichandren, J.1. Heard the learned Counsels appearing for the parties concerned.2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus to forbear the respondents 1 to 3 from running, conducting, approving, affiliating Arts and Science Academic Programmes, either by the said respondents or through its constituent, approved, affiliated or autonomous Colleges coming under their ambits, as per the concerned Anna University Acts.3. It has been stated that the petitioner Association is a society established under the Societies Registration Act, with society No. 137 of 1961. The petitioner Association has been functioning for over forty years. The objects of the petitioner Association includes the making of representations to the educational authorities, such as, the Ministry of Education, Government of India, the Universities, both Indian and Foreign, the University Grants Commission, the State Government, the Departments relating to education and other bodies intereste...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2013 (HC)

M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... was raised in the context of the amendment brought to the tamil nadu tax on entry of motor vehicles act. in the decision reported in 1997 (3) ctc 25.(r. gandhi and anr. vs union of india), this court dealt with the question in extenso and rejected the plea of the petitioner based on articles 254(2) and 255 of the ..... the high court, which held the state act as violative of article 19(1)(c) and not saved by article 19(4) of the constitution of india. thereafterwards, the hindi sahitya sammelan act no.13 of 1962 was passed in entry 63, list i of the seventh schedule to the constitution of india, which came up for challenge once again ..... , kerala v. t.a.kuttappan).30. the brief facts of the decision reported in air 197.sc 96.(damyanthi v. union of india) are that hindi sahitya sammelan, an association founded for development of hindi and its propagation throughout the country, was formed in the year 1910, registered as a society under the societies registration act. there were three classes of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

S. Tamilselvan and Others Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by th ...

Court : Chennai

..... there can be nothing wrong in such a scenario depicted in a novel. 139. in this context, reference may be made to the widespread controversy that arose out of a hindi film udta punjab , wherein the challenge laid by the producers of the film to the cuts recommended by the central board of film certification (cbfc), predominantly aimed at the ..... complaints were thus quashed. 3) nandini tiwari vs. union of india, 2014 s.c.c. online del. 4662 this case involved a writ petition filed to ban the hindi film finding fanny for using the word fanny. the writ petition was dismissed observing that obscenity has to be judged from the point of view of an average person, by ..... a woman s partner is infertile or where there are other genetic disorders affecting impregnation. in fact, we may note that not very long ago, there was a full length hindi commercial feature film vicky donor on this very topic, where of course, the subject has been dealt with in a subtle, humorous manner. 88. the publisher seeks to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //