Madras V Their - Judgment Search Results
Transport Commissioner, Madras-5 Vs. A. Radha Krishna Moorthy
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-01-1994
Reported in: JT1994(7)SC744; 1995LabIC1749; 1994(5)SCALE59; (1995)1SCC332
charges communicated to the respondent.3. The respondent Radha Krishna Moorthy was working as the Additional Regional Transport Officer, Madras (Central) during the period 20th June, 1984 to 20th March, 1985. In September 1985 he was promoted as … dated 4.6.89 was communicated to the respondent.4. The memo of charges first sets out the amounts misappropriated under various heads in the said office during the aforesaid years, and then follow paragraphs 4, 5 and 6, which
Madras Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Mad ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-20-1994
Reported in: 1994(69)ELT625(SC); JT1994(1)SC150; 1994(1)SCALE173; (1994)2SCC295; [1994]1SCR189
which the original substances lose their identity and get transformed into a new product.7. The appellant approached the Madras High Court by way of writ petition against the aforesaid order of the Assistant Collector dated January 7, … Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 levied duty on fertilizers at the rate of 15 per cent ad valorem. The Tariff item read as follows:Item No. 14HH - Fertilisers---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Item No. Description Rate of Duty ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14HH.
V.S. Thiagarajan Chettiar (Died) and 2 Others Vs. the Commissioner, La ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-05-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)CTC29; (1997)IIMLJ667
Matched in: Parties V.S. Thiagarajan Chettiar (Died) and 2 Others Vs. the Commissioner, Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Madras-5 and Another
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Registrar, University of Madras, Madras-5 Vs. Marudhar Kesari JaIn ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-01-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Mad65
college to write the University examination to be conducted by the third respondent, i.e., the Registrar, University of Madras, in September, 1995 pending disposal of the Writ Petition. I further direct that if the period for payment … to appear for the examination, which is scheduled to take place on 15th September, 1995.8. We find it very difficult to agree to thesubmission made on behalf of the petitioner institution that the students who have undergone
The Licensee, Bhuvaneswari Talkies, Gudiyatham Vs. the Appellate Autho ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-12-1999
Reported in: AIR1999Mad339; 1999(1)CTC266
Matched in: Parties The Licensee, Bhuvaneswari Talkies, Gudiyatham Vs. the Appellate Authority and Joint Commissioner-i, Land Administration Department Madras.5 and Others
A.R. Rajasakaran Vs. I.C.D. Triplicane Branch, 55 Big St., Madras 5 an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-22-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)CTC277
Matched in: Parties A.R. Rajasakaran Vs. I.C.D. Triplicane Branch, 55 Big St., Madras 5 and Another
S. Mohan Sambasivam Vs. the Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Ch ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-02-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)CTC573
by 'lawful possession' under that Act. Their Lordshipsfollowed an earlier decision of that Court, which came under the MadrasCinemas (Regulation) Rules, reported in M.C. Chockaligam and others v, V.Manickavasagam and others, : [1974]2SCR143 wherein, their Lordship atpara
D. Matsa Gandhi Vs. Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Rep. by Its Chairm ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-07-2000
Reported in: II(2000)ACC771; AIR2000Mad443; 2000(3)CTC24; (2000)IIMLJ830
Matched in: Parties D. Matsa Gandhi Vs. Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Rep. by Its Chairman, Madras-5
G. Vasantha Pai Vs. Special Commissioner and Commissioner (Land Reform ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-31-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)CTC272; (1998)IIIMLJ414
mostly employed in the northern parts of India and was very reluctant to purchase any landed property in Madras or Cochin either in his own name or as guardian of his minor children, because he felt that … Act') and determined that an extent of 1350 sq.mts. of urban land in S.No.210/2Al Alt Pt. of Thiruvanmiyur Village is an excess vacant land under Section 9(5) of the Act. On appeal against such determination, the respondent
Venkatachala Mudaliar Trust by Its Managing Trustee N. Ramaswamy, Coim ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-1997
Reported in: 2000(3)CTC719
five years prior to the dates of coming into force of the said Act in the City of Madras, City of Madurai and the Municipal Towns of Coimbatore,Salem and Thiruchirapalli and which continue to be under cultivation … the appellant contended that, I. The land in question are exempted from levy of Urban Land Tax in viewof Section 2(13) of the Act. II. As per G.O.Ms No.3526 Revenue, dated 15.6.1973, lands which were registered as
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free