Madras V Their - Law Dictionary Search Results
Keep open
to keep their vehicles thereto let their vehicles stand there to a licence under s. 270E of the Madras District Municipalities Act 1920, required only to keep open a private cart stand, Anamallais Bus Transport (Private) Ltd. … a private cart stand is 'kept open' only if it is kept open to others in charge of vehicles besides the owner of the place, to keep their vehicles thereto let their vehicles stand there to a
Sale of goods
on the supply of the materials used in such a contract treating it as a sale, State of Madras v. Gannan Dunkerley and Co. (Madras) Ltd., AIR 1958 SC 560 (577). [Government of India Act, 1935, Sch. 7,
Fees and taxes
court. And he extends this principle to tolls of roads and various other expenses, Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Shirur Mutt, 1954 SCR 1005 (1006, 1042): AIR 1954 SC 282: 1954 SCJ 335.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Maintenance
assisting either party with money or otherwise to prosecute or defend it; both actionable and indictable [see Bradlaugh v. Newdegate, (1883) 11 QBD 1], and invalidates contracts involving it. By the Roman Law it was a species
Open space
less an open space within the meaning of that expression in the proviso to rule 18(a) of the Madras Places of Public Resort Act II of 1888. It is equally clear that the existence of say one … one free at one corner of the space would not prevent the space being an open space, Nachimuthu v. Ramaswami Chettiar, 69 MLW 887: (1956) 2 MLJ 556 (DB). By the (English) Metropolitan Open Spaces Acts of
Freedom of speech and expression
includes freedom of propagation of idea which is ensured by freedom of circulation, Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 124: 1950 SCR 594: 1950 Cri LJ 1514. See also People's Union for Civil Liberties
Law
law in the abstract or general sense embodying the principles of natural justice, A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27: (1950) SCR 88. It is manifest that the law must satisfy two tests before
Income
benefit of the commodity may be deemed to give rise to income, S.S. Rajalinga Raja v. State of Madras, AIR 1967 SC 814: (1967) 1 SCR 950. It would not, however, be wrong to say that prima
Public safety
safety. The meaning of the expression must, however, vary according to the context, Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 124: 1950 SCR 594. [Constitution of India, Article 19 (2)]
Entices takes
D. Verdgama v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1973 SC 2313 (2320); See also S. Vordarajan v. State of Madras, AIR 1965 SC 942. (Indian Penal Code, s. 361)
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free