Legislative Assembly - Judgment Search Results

M.K. Stalin, Leader of Opposition and Member of Legislative Assembly V ...

Court: Chennai

of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent pertaining to S.O.Ms.No.108, Legislative Assembly Secretariat, dated 22.08.2016, quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to place the fifth respondent status-quo … of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent pertaining to S.O.Ms.No.108, Legislative Assembly Secretariat, dated 22.08.2016, whereby the fifth respondent, who was appointed as a Special Personal Assistant to the petitioner

Shri Filipe Nery Rodrigues, Member of the Legislative Assembly of Goa ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(2)BomCR424; (2006)108BOMLR227

3. 2. The writ petition is directed against the order dated 28.02.2005 passed by the Honourable Speaker, Goa Legislative Assembly, declaring the petitioner disqualified as a Member of the House in accordance with Clause 2 of para 2 … passing the impugned order : On 1st June, 2002, the petitioner was elected as Member of the Goa Legislative Assembly from Velim Constituency as an independent candidate. The petitioner extended support to the coalition ministry headed by Shri

Speaker, Orissa Legislative Assembly. Vs. Utkal Keshari ParidA.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Leave granted.2. These Appeals raise an interesting issue relating to the powers of the Speaker of the Orissa Legislative Assembly under Rule 6(1) and (2) of the Members of Orissa Legislative Assembly (Disqualification On Ground Of Defection) Rules, … of the Speaker of the Orissa Legislative Assembly under Rule 6(1) and (2) of the Members of Orissa Legislative Assembly (Disqualification On Ground Of Defection) Rules, 1987, hereinafter referred to as "the 1987 Rules", in the wake of

Speaker, Orissa Legislative Assembly Vs. Utkal Keshari Parida

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.469 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP(C)No.35000 of 2012) 1 Speaker, Orissa Legislative Assembly ⌠APPELLANT Vs. 2 Utkal Keshari Parida ⌠RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.470, 471 & 472 OF 201.(Arising … Leave granted.2. These Appeals raise an interesting issue relating to the powers of the Speaker of the Orissa Legislative Assembly under Rule 6(1) and (2) of the Members of Orissa Legislative Assembly (Disqualification On Ground Of Defection) Rules,

Rajasthan Legislative Assembly Secretariat Officers' Association and O ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1985(1)WLN129

of the learned Single Judge dated January 25, 1984, dismissing the writ petition No. 2037/82.2. The petitioners Rajasthan Legislative Assembly Secretariat Officers Association (here in after referred to as 'the Officer's Association') and Shri B. Goswami, Deputy Secretary. … in after referred to as 'the Officer's Association') and Shri B. Goswami, Deputy Secretary. Committee and Administration, Rajasthan Legislative Assembly Jaipur, filed a writ petition claiming the following reliefs:It is, therefore, humbly prayed:(i) that the appointment of respondent

Speaker, Legislative Assembly Vs. Abdul Jabbar Sheikh Hassan-ud-dIn Ba ...

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: AIR1985J& K1

--'Whether the allegations contained in the complaint of Sardar Rafiq Hussain Khan dated 3-7-1984, addressed to the Speaker Legislative Assembly attract the provisions of Section 24-G of the Representation of the People Act? If so, what is its … the Jammu and Kashmir National Conference, addressed the following communication to the Speaker of the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly :'To The Hon'ble Speaker, J & K Legislative Assembly, Srinagar. My dear Sir, I as Chief Whip of

Ajit Mohan Vs. Legislative Assembly, National Capital Territory Of Del ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) NO.1088 OF2020AJIT MOHAN & ORS. … PETITIONERS VERSUS LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. …RESPONDENTS INDEX S. No.Contents Page No.1. Prolegomenon 2 2. The Factual … in the society with people across political affiliations blaming each other.11. In the wake of these riots, the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (“the Assembly”) resolved to constitute a Committee on Peace and Harmony

Ashish Shelar Vs. The Maharashtra Legislative Assembly

Court: Supreme Court of India

COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.797 OF2021ASHISH SHELAR & ORS. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS THE MAHARASHTRA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY & ANR. …RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.807 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.800 OF2021AND WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.808 OF2021JUDGMENT … (CIVIL) NO.808 OF2021JUDGMENT A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.1. The petitioners have been duly elected as members of the current Maharashtra Legislative Assembly (2019­2024). They got elected from different constituencies in the State of Maharashtra. They belong to the Bharatiya Janata

Gyanendra Kumar Singh And Ors. Etc Vs. Bihar Legislative Assembly Patn ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5463-5464 OF2015GYANDENDRA KUMAR & ORS. Appellants VERSUS BIHAR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, PATNA & ANR. ETC. Respondents ORDER The instant appeals arise out of the order of disqualification issued by … The instant appeals arise out of the order of disqualification issued by the then Speaker of 15th Bihar Legislative Assembly. The term of said Assembly was from 20.11.2010 till 20.11.2015. One of the orders passed by the Speaker

Alagaapuram R. Mohanraj and Ors. Vs. Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly R ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.455 OF2015Alagaapuram R. Mohanraj & Others … Petitioners Versus Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Rep. by its Secretary & Another … Respondents JUDGMENT Chelameswar, J.1. This is a petition filed by six … by six petitioners invoking Article 32 of the Constitution of India. They are members of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly representing different constituencies. By a resolution of the assembly dated 19.02.2015, nineteen members of the assembly, including the