Leave - Judgment Search Results
Bidi, Bidi Leaves' and Tobacco Merchants Association Vs. the State of ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-15-1961
Reported in: AIR1962SC486; [1962(4)FLR71]; (1961)IILLJ663SC; [1962]Supp1SCR381
(hereafter called the Act). The petitioners in Special Civil Application No. 205 of 1958 are the Bidi, Bidi Leaves and Tobacco Merchants' Association, Gondia and two others, whereas the petitioners in Special Civil Application No. 214 of
Leave of the Court to File Fresh Suit on the Same Vs. Sarabjit Singh a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
the trial Court by observing as follows:- “Undisputedly, the plaintiff has not sought the Rs.4704 of 2012 -2- leave of the Court to file fresh suit on the same subject matter and cause of action. Hence, in
“3. Special Leave Is Not a Matter of Right Vested Vs. State of Harya ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-01-2013
(Annexure P-8) issued by respondent no.4, whereby the claim of the petitioner for the grant of Child Care Leave has been rejected and recovery is sought to be effected from the pay already disbursed to the petitioner
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Medical Leave Though they Had No Occasion to Vs. Kuldeep Singh and
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
16.06.1978 (Annexure P-2) as they had not participated in the strike on 08.02.1978 as they were on sanctioned leave on that date. In the written statement filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, the claim of
Leave Is Granted to Place on Record Documents Alongwith an Vs. the Aut ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-25-2014
for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.HaRs.Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) CM No.1037 of 2014 Leave is granted to place on record documents alongwith an affidavit of petitioner No.3 in pursuance of the last
Gondia Bidi Leaves Contractors Association Vs. Union of India and Othe ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-03-1996
Reported in: [1998]229ITR388(Bom)
section 206C of the Income-tax Act certifying that the members of the petitioner association are processors of tendu leaves and therefore are not liable to pay the tax under section 44AC and section 206C of the Act.
India Beedi Leaves Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-22-1983
Reported in: [1984]57STC190(Mad)
additional sales tax on them for the assessment year 1975-76. The assessees have been doing business in beedi leaves at Vaniyambadi and they declared a total and taxable turnover of Rs. 10,08,620.79 for the year 1975-76. After
Bidi Leaves and Tobacco Merchants' Association Vs. State of Bombay
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-23-1958
Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR890; (1959)IILLJ286Bom
other provisions of this schedule, the revised minimum rates of wages payable to employee per thousand bidis (when leaves are supplied by the employer) shall be as follows : Area Revised rate in Rs. (i) Nagpur district
Bidi, Bidi Leaves and Tobacco Merchants' Association Vs. the State of ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-15-1961
Reported in: (1962)64BOMLR375
(hereafter called the Act). The petitioners in Special Civil Application No. 205 of 1958 are the Bidi, Bidi Leaves and Tobacco Merchants' Association, Gondia, and two others, whereas the petitioners in Special Civil Application No. 214 of
Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. Three Leaves India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
CS NO.130 OF2016IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED -VERSUSTHREE LEAVES INDIA PVT.LTD.BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HARISH TANDON DATE:27th June, 2016. Appearance: Mr.Sudipta Sarkar,Sr.Adv.Mr.Sidhartha Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr.Adv.Ms.Moushumi Bhattacharyya,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free