Leanness - Judgment Search Results
Lean @ Kingsly vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-03-2022
DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1944 (CRIME NO.1266/2019 OF Anchalummoodu Police Station, Kollam District) PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: LEAN @ KINGSLY AGED 36 YEARS S/O. JOSE DICRUSE, AMMANDU VEEDU, NEAR PANDARA TEMPLE, MEPPADI CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM,
Eco Lean Research and Development a/S, a Danish Company Vs. the Assist ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Mar-19-2010
ORDER (No.52/2010) Hon'ble S. Usha, Vice-Chairman: 1. The appellants herein filed an application for registration of the trademark âECOLEANâ under application No.1375222 in respect of âPlastic materials in the form of plastic raw material for industrial...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tvs Lean Logistics Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2007
Reported in: (2007)212CTR(Mad)523; [2007]293ITR432(Mad)
P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The Revenue has preferred these appeals on a vexed substantial question of law as to whether the expenditure on construction of building in a leasehold premises would amount to revenue expenditure, contrary to...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“18. there Is Yet Another Factor Which Lead Us to Lean in Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
relevant and operative part whereof reads as follows:- “18. There is yet another factor which lead us to lean in favour of the petitioneRs.The land was acquired for setting up of a Grid Station in Sector 2-3
Satyendra Sharma and Surendra Sharma Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Oct-11-2006
held the appellants guilty under Section 302/34 I.P.C. and convicted them thereunder and sentenced them as mentioned above.9. Leaned counsel for the appellants submitted that the prosecution has failed to prove the prosecution case. No independent witness
Sureshwar Prasad Srivastav Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-20-2004
to receive all retirement/terminal benefits as admissible under the relevant rules applicable to him in his parent organization.7. Leaned counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any Rule which entitles the petitioner to receive retirement/terminal
Sundaram Finance Corporation by Managing Director, M. Subramaniam and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-24-1988
Reported in: (1989)1MLJ356
in monetary transactions with a view to earn interest which word is equivalent to the word compensation.3. The leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that chit transactions are well known schemes and widely prevalent in South India
Bodhan and ors. Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-15-1947
Reported in: AIR1948All223
conviction under Sections 304(ii) and 323, Penal Code, and various sentences of imprisonment passed upon them by the leaned Sessions Judge.2. On 28th August 1945, about two Gharis after sunrise, she buffaloes belonging to the appellants when
Moti Lal Vs. Mt. Sharda Devi
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-29-1947
Reported in: AIR1948All222
J.1. This is an appeal under Section 39, Arbitration Act (x of 1940) against the order of the leaned Civil and Sessions Judge of Cawnpore. The facts are briefly these:2. A lease was granted on 4th June
Girnar Traders Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-27-2007
Reported in: AIR2007SC3180; 2007(4)AWC3851(SC); 2008(1)BomCR454; 2007(10)SCALE391; (2007)7SCC555; 2007AIRSCW5782
page 899 and His Holiness Kesvananda Bharati v. State of Kerala : AIR1973SC1461 ].23. The court must always lean to the interpretation which is a reasonable one, and discard the literal interpretation which does not fit in
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free