Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Leanness - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 03 2022

Lean @ Kingsly vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-03-2022

DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1944 (CRIME NO.1266/2019 OF Anchalummoodu Police Station, Kollam District) PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: LEAN @ KINGSLY AGED 36 YEARS S/O. JOSE DICRUSE, AMMANDU VEEDU, NEAR PANDARA TEMPLE, MEPPADI CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM,


Mar 19 2010

Eco Lean Research and Development a/S, a Danish Company Vs. the Assist ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Mar-19-2010

ORDER (No.52/2010) Hon'ble S. Usha, Vice-Chairman: 1. The appellants herein filed an application for registration of the trademark “ECOLEAN” under application No.1375222 in respect of “Plastic materials in the form of plastic raw material for industrial...


Jun 27 2007

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tvs Lean Logistics Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-27-2007

Reported in: (2007)212CTR(Mad)523; [2007]293ITR432(Mad)

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The Revenue has preferred these appeals on a vexed substantial question of law as to whether the expenditure on construction of building in a leasehold premises would amount to revenue expenditure, contrary to...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 01 2013

“18. there Is Yet Another Factor Which Lead Us to Lean in Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-01-2013

relevant and operative part whereof reads as follows:- “18. There is yet another factor which lead us to lean in favour of the petitioneRs.The land was acquired for setting up of a Grid Station in Sector 2-3


Oct 11 2006

Satyendra Sharma and Surendra Sharma Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

Decided on: Oct-11-2006

held the appellants guilty under Section 302/34 I.P.C. and convicted them thereunder and sentenced them as mentioned above.9. Leaned counsel for the appellants submitted that the prosecution has failed to prove the prosecution case. No independent witness


May 20 2004

Sureshwar Prasad Srivastav Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: May-20-2004

to receive all retirement/terminal benefits as admissible under the relevant rules applicable to him in his parent organization.7. Leaned counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any Rule which entitles the petitioner to receive retirement/terminal


Nov 24 1988

Sundaram Finance Corporation by Managing Director, M. Subramaniam and ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-24-1988

Reported in: (1989)1MLJ356

in monetary transactions with a view to earn interest which word is equivalent to the word compensation.3. The leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that chit transactions are well known schemes and widely prevalent in South India


Oct 15 1947

Bodhan and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-15-1947

Reported in: AIR1948All223

conviction under Sections 304(ii) and 323, Penal Code, and various sentences of imprisonment passed upon them by the leaned Sessions Judge.2. On 28th August 1945, about two Gharis after sunrise, she buffaloes belonging to the appellants when


Oct 29 1947

Moti Lal Vs. Mt. Sharda Devi

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-29-1947

Reported in: AIR1948All222

J.1. This is an appeal under Section 39, Arbitration Act (x of 1940) against the order of the leaned Civil and Sessions Judge of Cawnpore. The facts are briefly these:2. A lease was granted on 4th June


Aug 27 2007

Girnar Traders Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-27-2007

Reported in: AIR2007SC3180; 2007(4)AWC3851(SC); 2008(1)BomCR454; 2007(10)SCALE391; (2007)7SCC555; 2007AIRSCW5782

page 899 and His Holiness Kesvananda Bharati v. State of Kerala : AIR1973SC1461 ].23. The court must always lean to the interpretation which is a reasonable one, and discard the literal interpretation which does not fit in


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial