Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Law Department - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 2015

Hanuman Singh Vs. Law Department

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-20-2015

Chutia, Post Chutia, Police Station Chutia, District Ranchi ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer, Law Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, officiating from Project Bhawan, Post Dhurwa, Police Station Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 3.The Under Secretary, … Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, officiating from Project Bhawan, Post Dhurwa, Police Station Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 3.The Under Secretary, Law Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, officiating from Project Bhawan, Post Dhurwa, Police Station Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 4.The Accountant General,


Jan 16 2009

Gokha Behera Vs. Principal Secretary, Law Department and 3 ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Jan-16-2009

Reported in: 107(2009)CLT438

of which de novo inquiry was warranted as the first inquiry had been conducted strictly in accordance with law and it ought to have been accepted by the Court. More so, the second inquiry report is perverse … dated 10.12.2003 ( Annex.- 10 ) by which the Petitioner has been dismissed from service after holding the departmental proceedings and further to reinstate him in service with back wages.2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to


Feb 19 2026

DURAIRAJ Vs The Secretary to Government of the Law Department,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-19-2026

MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP No. 5848 of 2026 Durairaj Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary to Government of the Law Department, Law Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Deputy Secretary to Government Law (Admin) Department, Secretariat, Respondent(s) This writ … M.DHANDAPANI and WMP No. 5848 of 2026 Durairaj Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary to Government of the Law Department, Law Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Deputy Secretary to Government Law (Admin) Department, Secretariat, Respondent(s) This writ petition has


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 02 2005

Kulkarni Sudheer Hanumanth Rao and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka, Re ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-02-2005

Reported in: ILR2005KAR1332; 2005(2)KarLJ329

the Writ Petitions may be stated as under:-By means of impugned Notification bearing No.LAW.106.LAC.97 dated 18.2.1998 by the Law Department, the Petitioners were appointed as Civil Judges (Junior Division) in the Karnataka Judicial Service. After the Petitioners underwent


Oct 30 2009

Association of A.P. Sajjada Nasheens, Mutawallies and Khidmat Guzaran ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-30-2009

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT112

of age and, therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.10. Assistant Secretary to Government Minorities Welfare Department, AP Secretariat, Hyderabad, filed counter affidavit representing the 2nd respondent-Secretary, Minority Welfare & Wakf Department, Government of AP, … statute or by the users of the wakf and such persons are called 'Mutawallis' under the Muslim Personal Law. The very purpose of enacting the Act is to provide better administration for wakfs and the matters connected


May 01 2007

B. Narasimha Reddy, Chairman, Nalgondaranga Reddy District Milk Produc ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: May-01-2007

Reported in: 2007(6)ALT681

Matched in: Parties B. Narasimha Reddy, Chairman, Nalgondaranga Reddy District Milk Producers Co-op. Union Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Secretary, Legislative Affairs and Justice, Law Department and ors.


Oct 17 2008

Rajesh Kumar Srivastava S/O Ram Bali Srivastava and ors. Vs. State of ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-17-2008

Reported in: 2009(1)AWC239(All)

of India and Ors. v. S. Vinodh Kumar and Ors.. There is no dispute to the proposition of law that ordinarily the unsuccessful candidate who have participated in the selection without any protest, have no right to … not entitle for regularisation under the U.P. Regularisation of Ad hoc Appointments (on Posts outside the purview of Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979, as amended from time to time, lastly on 20.12.2001, inasmuch as the Rules provided


Dec 19 2007

Biranchi Kumar Aich Vs. State of Orissa Represented Through the Secret ...

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Dec-19-2007

Reported in: 105(2008)CLT500

on when he was found fit for promotion he was duly given promotion to Orissa Judicial Service Class-I.5. Law is well settled that promotion cannot be claimed as a matter of right. An employee has only a


Jan 02 2008

K. Saktheeananth Vs. the Secretary to Government, Law Department, Gove ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-02-2008

Reported in: (2008)1MLJ930

the said recommendations, the petitioner has submitted representations to the first respondent, viz., the Government of Tamil Nadu, Law Department and the 3rd respondent, viz., the Vice Chancellor of Dr.Ambedkar Law University, Chennai, since there was no response, … writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents 1 to 3 viz., the State Government, the Law Department and the Vice Chancellor of Dr.Ambedkar Law University to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 9.8.2007 and


Apr 16 2005

P. John Samuel Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Government ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-16-2005

Reported in: AIR2005Mad442; (2005)3MLJ250

signature and seal with the expression 'signed before me', with a document-writer, which were seized by the Vigilance Department. An enquiry was held into the matter and the appellant was found guilty. His notary certificate was cancelled … have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and carefully perused the records. 3. The appellant is a lawyer, practising in the courts at Saidapet. He was also a Notary, having been appointed by the respondent under


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial