Law Department - Judgment Search Results
Hanuman Singh Vs. Law Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
Chutia, Post Chutia, Police Station Chutia, District Ranchi ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer, Law Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, officiating from Project Bhawan, Post Dhurwa, Police Station Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 3.The Under Secretary, … Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, officiating from Project Bhawan, Post Dhurwa, Police Station Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 3.The Under Secretary, Law Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, officiating from Project Bhawan, Post Dhurwa, Police Station Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 4.The Accountant General,
Gokha Behera Vs. Principal Secretary, Law Department and 3 ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-16-2009
Reported in: 107(2009)CLT438
of which de novo inquiry was warranted as the first inquiry had been conducted strictly in accordance with law and it ought to have been accepted by the Court. More so, the second inquiry report is perverse … dated 10.12.2003 ( Annex.- 10 ) by which the Petitioner has been dismissed from service after holding the departmental proceedings and further to reinstate him in service with back wages.2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to
DURAIRAJ Vs The Secretary to Government of the Law Department,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-19-2026
MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP No. 5848 of 2026 Durairaj Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary to Government of the Law Department, Law Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Deputy Secretary to Government Law (Admin) Department, Secretariat, Respondent(s) This writ … M.DHANDAPANI and WMP No. 5848 of 2026 Durairaj Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary to Government of the Law Department, Law Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Deputy Secretary to Government Law (Admin) Department, Secretariat, Respondent(s) This writ petition has
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kulkarni Sudheer Hanumanth Rao and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka, Re ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-02-2005
Reported in: ILR2005KAR1332; 2005(2)KarLJ329
the Writ Petitions may be stated as under:-By means of impugned Notification bearing No.LAW.106.LAC.97 dated 18.2.1998 by the Law Department, the Petitioners were appointed as Civil Judges (Junior Division) in the Karnataka Judicial Service. After the Petitioners underwent
Association of A.P. Sajjada Nasheens, Mutawallies and Khidmat Guzaran ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2009
Reported in: 2010(1)ALT112
of age and, therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.10. Assistant Secretary to Government Minorities Welfare Department, AP Secretariat, Hyderabad, filed counter affidavit representing the 2nd respondent-Secretary, Minority Welfare & Wakf Department, Government of AP, … statute or by the users of the wakf and such persons are called 'Mutawallis' under the Muslim Personal Law. The very purpose of enacting the Act is to provide better administration for wakfs and the matters connected
B. Narasimha Reddy, Chairman, Nalgondaranga Reddy District Milk Produc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-2007
Reported in: 2007(6)ALT681
Matched in: Parties B. Narasimha Reddy, Chairman, Nalgondaranga Reddy District Milk Producers Co-op. Union Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Secretary, Legislative Affairs and Justice, Law Department and ors.
Rajesh Kumar Srivastava S/O Ram Bali Srivastava and ors. Vs. State of ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-17-2008
Reported in: 2009(1)AWC239(All)
of India and Ors. v. S. Vinodh Kumar and Ors.. There is no dispute to the proposition of law that ordinarily the unsuccessful candidate who have participated in the selection without any protest, have no right to … not entitle for regularisation under the U.P. Regularisation of Ad hoc Appointments (on Posts outside the purview of Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979, as amended from time to time, lastly on 20.12.2001, inasmuch as the Rules provided
Biranchi Kumar Aich Vs. State of Orissa Represented Through the Secret ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Dec-19-2007
Reported in: 105(2008)CLT500
on when he was found fit for promotion he was duly given promotion to Orissa Judicial Service Class-I.5. Law is well settled that promotion cannot be claimed as a matter of right. An employee has only a
K. Saktheeananth Vs. the Secretary to Government, Law Department, Gove ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2008
Reported in: (2008)1MLJ930
the said recommendations, the petitioner has submitted representations to the first respondent, viz., the Government of Tamil Nadu, Law Department and the 3rd respondent, viz., the Vice Chancellor of Dr.Ambedkar Law University, Chennai, since there was no response, … writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents 1 to 3 viz., the State Government, the Law Department and the Vice Chancellor of Dr.Ambedkar Law University to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 9.8.2007 and
P. John Samuel Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Government ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2005
Reported in: AIR2005Mad442; (2005)3MLJ250
signature and seal with the expression 'signed before me', with a document-writer, which were seized by the Vigilance Department. An enquiry was held into the matter and the appellant was found guilty. His notary certificate was cancelled … have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and carefully perused the records. 3. The appellant is a lawyer, practising in the courts at Saidapet. He was also a Notary, having been appointed by the respondent under
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free