Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Page 7 of about 9,649 results (0.177 seconds)

S. Vasudeva Vs. Government of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(1)KarLJ116

..... 11 of 1959); or (v) any society registered under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960); or (vi) a trust ..... the authority as per plans, designs and conditions to be approved by the authority or in conformity with the provisions of the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 and the bye-laws made thereunder.(ii) the purchaser shall not without approval of the authority construct on the site any ..... act, if the allotment was made in favour of:(i) the state government; or (ii) the central government; or (iii) any corporation, body or organisation owned or controlled by the central government or the state government; or (iv) any housing co-operative society registered under the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959 (karnataka act .....

Sarabheshwara Vidya Peetha Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR3182; 1988(3)KarLJ415

..... grievance of this petitioner is that the. impugned order rejecting its application is. also opposed to the relevant provisions of section 53 of the karnataka state universities act, 1976 (in short 'the act') since a duty is cast upon the state government to grant the permission sought for once it is found that the petitioner has complied ..... petitions, they are disposed of by a common order.2. the petitioner in writ petition no. 13227 of 1987 in an educational institution registered under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 and it is not in dispute that this association is a minority institution which enjoys the protection of article 40 of the constitution. it is ..... the university as affiliated colleges by the university on the recommendations made by the state government. so, the right of affiliation is controlled by the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 53 of the act.18. it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the provisions of section 53(1) of the .....

Chikka Kullegowda Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR4557; 1991(3)KarLJ142

..... jivaji @ balasaheb venkatesh anikhindi v. sadashiva rao ramachandra rao pote, : ilr1991kar4307 while considering the question whether the provisions of the limitation act could be applied to eviction proceedings arising under the karnataka rent control act, in view of non-obstinate clause in section 21 (1) thereof, has held as follows:-'section 21(1) of the ..... act opens with the non-obstinate clause 'notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law or contract'. thus, the non-obstinate clause contained in section 21 of the act ..... were left unnoticed while laying down the ruling interpreting rule 43j.28. when the constitutional validity of the act was challenged, this court in s.v. krishnappa v. state of karnataka ilr karnataka 1982(2) 1310 has held with regard to classification of grantees as follows:-'the question is whether the classification .....

Golden Colour Lab and Studio and ors. Vs. the Commissioner of Commerci ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4883; [2003]134STC570(Kar)

..... no application in the present case at all because this court itself considered the effect of d.c. bhatia case with reference to the provisions of trie karnataka rent control act and applied the same thereto and thereafter declared what the law should be. though this court did not specifically refer to the decision in padmanabha rao case ..... in rudramurthy, the supreme court held that the decision of the supreme in shobha surendar (following the decision in bhatia, relating to bombay rent act) impliedly held that section 31 of karnataka rent control act, 1961 was valid and therefore in the statute book, thereby clearing the eclipse created by the decision in padmanabha rao. though the decision in ..... 's case), the law declared by this court in d.c. bhatia's case and applied the same with reference to the provisions of the karnataka rent control act. the clear pronouncement made by this court in shobha surender's case was that d.c. bhatia was applicable with reference to section 31 of krc .....

A.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...

Court : Chennai

..... relief only till the disposal of the statutory appeal under section 26. therefore, more than supporting the stand of the respondents, the judgment of the karnataka high court tends to support the view i have taken above.75. therefore, it is clear that section 8(4) cannot be understood to confer ..... varieties and farmers' rights act, 2001paragraph-22offences under the environment protection act, 1986paragraph-23offences under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974paragraph-24offences under the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981paragraph-25offences under the suppression of unlawful acts against safety of maritime navigation and fixed platforms on continental shelf act, 200241. under paragraph 1 ..... it could be seen that the concern of the global community which led to the above resolutions, was about the illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and the huge amount of money generated from the same. the original object of the declaration of the general assembly and the .....

Rattan Lal Vs. Vardesh Chander and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi628

..... a notice terminating the tenancy before seeking ejectment. this view was reiterated by the said court in hem chand(7) while dealing with the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952. interestingly enough, in the later decision, support was sought from the decision of the supreme court in rai brij raj krishna (supra) (5), and with ..... the contention, that no notice was necessary in view of the provisions of section 13(3)(a) of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947 was negatived and it was held that it was incumbent upon the landlord to determine the contractual tenancy by a proper notice before he could file ..... ) (3) where the supreme court was concerned with the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960. but the mist disappears on a closer examination of the majority decisions in that case. the question was whether the madras act controlled both contractual as well as statutory tenancies and was, thereforee, a complete code enabling both the landlords .....

Piroja M. Mehta Vs. Hambai Jamshedji Cama (Dr.) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR1; (1988)90BOMLR292

..... were filed on 6th of december, 1980. it was when this execution was pending that the village was brought within the area to which the karnataka rent control act applied. the notification making the act so applicable was issued on 18th of july, 1983. despite this, an order for delivery of possession was passed on 23rd of june, 1984 ..... the tenant could be evicted by an order passed after the coming into force of the karnataka rent control act. the answer was obvious, with great respect, in the negative because of the provisions contained in section 21(1) of the karnataka rent control act in the following words :-'notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law or contract ..... and tendolkar, j., decided as follows :-the expression 'the first day of hearing' in section 12(3)(b) of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947, means, not the day fixed for return of the summons or the returnable day, but the day on which the judge applies his mind to the case, .....

Vidarbha (Rent Contorl) Bhadekaru Sangh, Akola and anr. Etc. Vs. State ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1986MhLJ882

..... excluded form consideration because theletting of the houses has to be regulated through the agency of the collector provisions similar to the mysore house rent and accommodation control act (30 of 1951) to which we have referred requiring the consideration of the question of the suitability of the tenant after hearing the representations of the ..... in 1963 and 1977 - to eremove the inequality between the temples and mutts situated in the south kanara district and those situated in other areas of karnataka. inequality is so cleary writ large ontlhefact of the impugned statute in its applicant to the distfict of souty kanara only that it is periloualybear the periphery ..... south kanara formtoday but we would like to make it clear that if the karnataka legislature does not act promptly and remove the inequality arising out of the application of the madras act of 1951 to the district of south kanara only, the act will have to suffer a serious and successful challenge in;thenot distant future. .....

Ahamed HossaIn Sk. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2001)3CALLT335(HC),2001(2)CHN762

..... ataur rahaman khan v. mohd. kamaluddin ahmed (1987 (1) andhra law times 216) held that section 4 of the a.p. buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1960 was unconstitutional. in a subsequent matter, which came before another learned single judge of that high court in revision, it was observed that similar provision under the east ..... punjab urban rent restriction act having been held valid and reasonable by the supreme court in sant lal bharatt v. state of punjab (1998 (1) scc 366), the learned single judge held ..... alter or vary from, according to his private sentiment .........'20. we must, however, hasten to add that in the instant case, the learned single judge has acted with utmost propriety in that the single judge did not decide the matter before him contrary to the decision of the division bench. we are however, required to .....

Nalinikant Vs. Ramacharya Burli (Deceased) by L.Rs and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR1681; 2000(4)KarLJ314

..... court held that the whole proceedings are vitiated. it is not so in this case and they were not required to be notified in view of section 30 of karnataka rent control act.he next relied on a decision of this court in thakurdas and another v venilal and others. this has no application to the facts of the present case ..... civil suit no. 120 of 1959 on the file of the munsiff, bagalkot under section 13(1)(a), (e), (j) and (k) of the bombay rent act, repealed and replaced by the karnataka rent control act, 1961. defendants resisted it and after contest it was dismissed. aggrieved by the said order, landlord filed h.r.c. appeal no. 13 of 1972 in the ..... to immunity from eviction in the case. the eviction petition has been allowed on the ground of subletting by the 3rd defendant. more importantly, section 30 of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 contemplates that where the interest of the tenant in any premises is determined for any reason whatsoever and any order is made by the court under the .....