Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 104 results (0.525 seconds)

Ahamed HossaIn Sk. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2001)3CALLT335(HC),2001(2)CHN762

..... ataur rahaman khan v. mohd. kamaluddin ahmed (1987 (1) andhra law times 216) held that section 4 of the a.p. buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1960 was unconstitutional. in a subsequent matter, which came before another learned single judge of that high court in revision, it was observed that similar provision under the east ..... punjab urban rent restriction act having been held valid and reasonable by the supreme court in sant lal bharatt v. state of punjab (1998 (1) scc 366), the learned single judge held ..... alter or vary from, according to his private sentiment .........'20. we must, however, hasten to add that in the instant case, the learned single judge has acted with utmost propriety in that the single judge did not decide the matter before him contrary to the decision of the division bench. we are however, required to .....

Joydeep Mukherjee and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN546

..... under protest does not arise. so, they have no right to seek a reference to the civil court under section 18 of the act.294. in the decision reported in : air2005sc2204 , state of karnataka & anr. v. sangappa dyavappa biradar and ors., the hon'ble supreme court held that a right of a landholder to obtain ..... making laws.177. according to article 39 of the constitution of india, the state shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good. the laws made for the purpose of securing the constitutional ..... court is thus to confine itself to the question of legality. the hon'ble supreme court has specifically stated the grounds upon which an administrative action is subject to control by judicial review can be classified as hereunder:a) illegality,b) irrationality, viz, wednesbury unreasonableness,c) procedural impropriety.140. in the decision reported in : [1973] .....

Kishwar Jahan and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(3)CHN857

..... of the constitution and, therefore, their impugned actions are unconstitutional. the decision reported in 2001 cr. lj 238, soubhagya v. chief secretary, state of karnataka was relied on while urging the court to direct the state to take appropriate disciplinary action against the erring police officers.101. inspection of copy of ..... submitted, is statutorily recognised in section 149 of the code and 23 of the police act. reference was also made to the indian standards of code of conduct for the police human rights, international challenges, by dr. s. subramanian (page 262 ..... no confrontation. the people at large with their own private problems approach the police authorities with the expectation that the very presence of the police would act as a deterrent in the escalation of such problems which otherwise have the potentiality of leading to undesirable consequences involving commission of offence. this, he .....

Indian Airlines Corporation Vs. Sm. Madhuri Chowdhuri and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1965Cal252

..... gravity was not within the safe limits. the aircraft carried sufficient fuel and oil. 5. the captain was in possession of all relevant meteorological communications and air traffic control information and other data required for the flight. 6. the weather conditions were good. 106. in fact this particular plane was flying on the route and ..... or inlandnavigation. 118. although aeroplanes or airships were nonexistent or barely existent in india in 1911, nevertheless india had an indian airships act of 1911 being act 17 of 1911. this was an act to control the manufacture, possession, use, sale, import and export of airships. under sections 3, 5, 6 and 13 of this ..... unqualified right of exemption recognised by the common law, was cut down by the warsaw convention and applies to international carriage under the indian carriage by air act of 1934. what is said in the international treaties or arrangements such as warsaw convention cannot under the cover of 'justice, equity and good conscience' be .....

Manju Banerjee and ors. Vs. Debabrata Pal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2006)1CALLT87(HC)

..... as a reference to the advocate general of the state.7. from the aforesaid statutory dispensation, it is clear that lrtt has been created under the said act. the said act has been enacted pursuant to the provisions of the constitution. the constitution itself provides that such a tribunal may have powers including the power to punish for ..... on which the matter was argued before this court was whether the order of lrtt by which it refused to exercise its jurisdiction under the contempt of courts act can be assailed before this court under article 226 of the constitution of india in view of the constitution bench judgment of the supreme court in the case ..... set up. it cannot be disputed that lrtt has been set up under the provisions of the west bengal land reforms & tenancy tribunal act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the said act). the said act was passed in terms of the enabling provisions under article 323b of the constitution of india which empowers the appropriate legislature to enact law .....

Sugandha Roy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1983Cal468

..... under the said 1974 and 1982 agreements has provided to bangladesh a permanent corridor for enabling her to cross over the indian territory and to have political control over dahagram and angarpota enclaves, which factually are already part of india inasmuch as people living there are dependent on mukligunj and kuchlibari for their livelihood, ..... providing for the merger of india enclaves in east pakistan with pakistan and the merger of pakistan enclaves in india with india. the constitution (ninth amendment) act, 1960 provided for its implementation. section 2 (a) of the saidamendment defined the appointed day for transfer as such date as the central government may ..... in order to give constitutional sanction to the above agreement on the advice rendered by the supreme court on a presidential reference, the constitution (ninth-amendment) act was passed by parliament in dec. 1960. in order to connect dahagram with panbari mauza on the bangladesh main land, india agreed to lease in perpetuity .....

Chandeswar Prosad Singh and anr. Vs. Sub Divisional Land Reforms Offic ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1986Cal1,89CWN414

..... & co. ltd. v. union of india reported in : 1983ecr1607d(sc) . in this case. section 3(1)(a) of the imports and exports (control) act, 1947 which conferred power on the central government to make provisions for prohibiting, restricting or otherwise controlling the import, export, carriage, or shipment of specified goods as ship's stores was sought to be impugned as ultra vires inter ..... .section 2. it is hereby declared that it is expedient in the public interest that the union should take under its control the regulation of mines and the development of minerals to the extent hereinafter provided.section 3. in this act, unless the context otherwise requires -- (a) 'minerals' includes all minerals except mineral oils;(e) 'minor minerals' means building stones, gravel, ordinary .....

Pramatha Nath Mitter and Ors. Vs. Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the Hig ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1961Cal545,65CWN920

..... high courts in part a states. it came into operation on or about 20th may, 1954. as originally framed, there was no provision in this act for the control by the central government of any vacations enjoyed by the learned judges of high courts in india. so far as the calcutta high court is concerned, ..... ordinarily understood, the calcutta high court has, and always bad, three vacations, namely the easter vacation, the puja vacation and the christmas vacation, the acts and the order purport to control these vacations and not holidays other than vacations. for our purpose it is not necessary to go beyond the establishment of the supreme court in calcutta ..... is the union legislative competence. it is to my mind difficult to bring periodic or annual control of vacations of state high courts as institutions of justice by the president under section 23a of high court judges (conditions of service) act 1954 within either ''constitution' or 'organisation' of a state high court, without entrenching on .....

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... state list, that area is abstracted from the state list. nothing more.334. the court further held that there is no conflict between the gold control act and the debt act. secondly, the subjects of both the legislations can be traced to the concurrent list and article 254(2) validates within the state the operation of ..... v. henry ah hoe, hoechst pharmaceuticals ltd. v. state of bihar, lingappa pochanna appelwar v. state of maharashtra and vijay kumar sharma v. state of karnataka.537. we have also noticed in the said decision when the repugnancy between the central and state legislations is pleaded it is necessary to examine whether the two ..... thereafter 25th constitution amendment took place where the word compensation was replaced by the word amount.273. the constitution bench of the supreme court in state of karnataka vs. ranganatha reddy reported in (1977) 4 scc 471 laid down the legislative history of article 31(2) and held that subsequent to 25th amendment, bank nationalization .....

Paschim Banga Malbahi Cycle Mazdoor Union and ors. Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1961Cal125,65CWN213

..... municipal provision for the registration of the carts and taxing their trade or calling transfer traffic control to the corporation of calcutta. section 610 of the calcutta municipal act 1951 also is an answer to this argument. it provides:'except in this act otherwise expressly provided, nothing in this act shall be deemed to affect the provisions of any other enactments.'this section makes it ..... order under these sections can be made. a representative and responsible state government may, not unreasonably, be assumed to act reasonably before giving its sanction. see the observations of das c. j., in : [1958]1scr308 . having regard to the reasons of traffic control and having regard to the eleven reasons set out in the affidavit of the government, i am unable to hold .....