Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: delhi Page 28 of about 397 results (0.348 seconds)

D. V. Malhotra vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... .rev.p. 262/2016, crl.rev.p. 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & crl.rev.p. 265/2016 page 96 of 106 offending act, no direct evidence can be expected. [ref: state of karnataka v. selvi j.jayalalitha (supra)].116. on the basis of the above discussion, in my view, prima facie, there was sufficient ground for proceeding against ..... . 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & crl.rev.p. 265/2016 page 89 of 106 (i) mr. sushil ansal, mr. gopal ansal (who were allegedly in financial control & control over the day-to-day functioning of the uphaar cinema, at the relevant time) and mr. h.s. panwar (fire officer at the delhi fire services) were facing prosecution in ..... v. malhotra was the general manager. it is stated that this letter proves that ansal properties and industries limited, of which mr. sushil ansal was the chairman, had direct control over the functioning of uphaar cinema. further, it is stated that the object behind the tampering of this document was also to not let a document linking ansal properties & .....

Wander Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1999)(110)ELT735TriDel

..... industry had to be decided as how it means to a common man in the trade and in common parlance. the apex court agreed with the division bench of the karnataka high court that a product must be classified having regard to what it means and how it is understood in common parlance and that in a case of such a ..... the product marketed under the brand name 'spert'. the appellants had sought classification of the spert under sub-heading no. 0404.00 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the "tariff"), as "other dairy produce; edible products of animal origin, not elsewhere specified or included". chapter 4 of the tariff covered dairy produce; edible .....

H.M. Bags Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1994)LC486Tri(Delhi)

..... date of issue of show cause notice would be valid.9. we find that in the case of guru priya tele auto (p) ltd. v. supdt.central excise the karnataka high court while referring to a catena of judgments of the supreme court and various high court has, once again held that section 11a of the central excises and salt ..... list, the excise authorities are not barred from re-opening the classification and raising the demand under the provisions of section 11a of the central excises and salt act, 1944. in the case of elson machines pvt. ltd. v.collector of central excise, 1988 (38) e.l.t. 571 (sc), the supreme court has held that "excise ..... is seen that the main point that arises for consideration in this case is whether the department can raise a demand under section 11a of the central excises and salt act by taking a view different from the approved classification list. in this regard we find that it is now well settled that even when there is an approved classification .....

Devender Kumar vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... be appropriate to note the decision of the seven judge bench of the hon ble supreme court reported as (2002) 4 scc478p. ramachandra rao v. state of karnataka while dealing with speedy trial in criminal proceedings wherein it was held: for our purpose to reproduce all in its pronouncement, 9. the constitution bench, in ..... governments of their constitutional obligation to strengthen the judiciary quantitatively and qualitatively by providing requisite funds, manpower and infrastructure. we hope and trust that the governments shall act. 20. as held by the hon ble supreme court in p. ramachandra rao (supra) a fair, just and reasonable procedure implicit in article 21 of ..... . agarwal vs. state (supra) relied on by learned counsels for the petitioners, full bench of this court held: 30. likewise, the proceedings under income tax act filed under article 226 will not involve criminal jurisdiction. the judgment of the supreme court in the case of dr. vijay anand maharaj (supra) demonstrates this. the .....

Rakesh Asthana vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... be appropriate to note the decision of the seven judge bench of the hon ble supreme court reported as (2002) 4 scc478p. ramachandra rao v. state of karnataka while dealing with speedy trial in criminal proceedings wherein it was held: for our purpose to reproduce all in its pronouncement, 9. the constitution bench, in ..... governments of their constitutional obligation to strengthen the judiciary quantitatively and qualitatively by providing requisite funds, manpower and infrastructure. we hope and trust that the governments shall act. 20. as held by the hon ble supreme court in p. ramachandra rao (supra) a fair, just and reasonable procedure implicit in article 21 of ..... . agarwal vs. state (supra) relied on by learned counsels for the petitioners, full bench of this court held: 30. likewise, the proceedings under income tax act filed under article 226 will not involve criminal jurisdiction. the judgment of the supreme court in the case of dr. vijay anand maharaj (supra) demonstrates this. the .....

Manoj Prasad vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... be appropriate to note the decision of the seven judge bench of the hon ble supreme court reported as (2002) 4 scc478p. ramachandra rao v. state of karnataka while dealing with speedy trial in criminal proceedings wherein it was held: for our purpose to reproduce all in its pronouncement, 9. the constitution bench, in ..... governments of their constitutional obligation to strengthen the judiciary quantitatively and qualitatively by providing requisite funds, manpower and infrastructure. we hope and trust that the governments shall act. 20. as held by the hon ble supreme court in p. ramachandra rao (supra) a fair, just and reasonable procedure implicit in article 21 of ..... . agarwal vs. state (supra) relied on by learned counsels for the petitioners, full bench of this court held: 30. likewise, the proceedings under income tax act filed under article 226 will not involve criminal jurisdiction. the judgment of the supreme court in the case of dr. vijay anand maharaj (supra) demonstrates this. the .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Nuchem Plastics Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1990)(29)ECC44

..... resin is usually applied to the broad class of materials regardless of application." "a resin has been described as "high molecular weight material often of variable but controlled molecular weight which soften at high tempreature. synthetic resins are formed by polymerisation." the above references clearly indicate that the major raw-material in question is a ..... industries ltd. and ors. v.collector of central excise and ors. (supra), the hon'ble supreme court held that the classification of goods under central excise tariff act was not dependent on classification under btn. in paragraph-10 of the judgment, supreme court observed as follows : "our attention has been drawn on behalf of ..... polyisobutylene classifiable under heading 39.01/06 according to note 2(c) to chapter 39 or alternatively under heading 38.01/19(1) of the customs tariff act, 1975. in the said case, the tribunal held that the said note 2(c) required that the condensation product should be resin polymerised to a particular .....

G.T.C. Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1995)LC487Tri(Delhi)

..... formation but which, at the same time, necessitates the addition of large percentages of the filler to provide the desired porosity. the rate of burning of the cigarette is controlled largely by the porosity of the paper, which depends, among other factors, upon the percentage of filler in the sheet, and by the size and shape of the ..... conversion of this paper into a decorative paper by 'motley' process for their use; and it is self-evident that such a decorative process (that is the mere act of mottling) by itself does not convert it into cigarette paper.23. therefore, in my view if the department considered that the tipping paper was classifiable under 48. ..... confirmed the classification of the product, "surface decorated covered paper" used in wrapping filter mass and assembling filter tip of cigarettes in tariff heading 4813.00 of central excise tariff act, attracting duty @ 10% + rs. 2425/- per m.t.basic. thus, the classification list no. 1/89 w.e.f. 20-10-1989 has been finally approved .....

Org Systems Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1989)(23)LC100Tri(Delhi)

..... support of his argument, shri sorabjee has referred to a judgment of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of s. kannan and ors. v. secretary, karnataka state road transport authority reported in (1984) 1 supreme court cases 375 where the supreme court had held in para no. 15: "it is equally not possible ..... the word 'assistant' according to the concise oxford dictionary new seventh edition means, inter alia, helping; subordinate. the assistant collector who is not defined in the act is thus only a subordinate of the collector. there is no prohibition in the section from collector himself exercising the powers of the assistant collector. even otherwise it is ..... are several decisions as to this expression but given in different context and they would not help in the present case. it is significant that central excises and salt act, 1944 itself has no definition of "collector" though it has definition of adjudicating authority' and 'central excise officers' [sections 2(a) and (b)]. again the .....

Central Bureau of Investigation vs.sanjeev Kumar & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... of falling under as (2018) 16 supreme court cases 273, the supreme court re-affirmed its view taken in sonu (supra).19. in state of karnataka v. m.r.hiremath reported as 2019 7 scc515 the supreme court was seized with a case, wherein absence of certificate under section 65-b of the evidence ..... prejudicing the accused.5. per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioner deliberately did not file the certificate under section 65b of the indian evidence act earlier. it was contended that it is not the case where the certificate was obtained earlier but could not be filed, inadvertently. he submitted that the certificate, ..... recordings were already filed and placed on record. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by filing the aforesaid certificate under section 65b of the indian evidence act and recalling the witnesses in this respect would not change the nature of the case against the accused/respondents as the said conversations have been relied upon .....