Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: delhi Page 27 of about 397 results (0.439 seconds)

Technip Singapore Pte Ltd. Vs. Director of Income Tax and Another

Court : Delhi

..... erection of equipment. mobilisation/demobilisation constituted an integral part of the contract. secondly, the aar has proceeded on a factual misconception that the dominion and control of the equipment was with iocl. it was erroneously concluded that the payment for such mobilisation/demobilisation constitutes royalty. in that view of the matter, ..... that are ancillary and subsidiary to the rental or ships, aircraft, containers or other equipment used in connect with the operation of ships or aircraft in international traffic; (c) for teaching in or by educational institutions; (d) for services for the personal use of the individual or idividuals making the payment; (e) ..... . application before the aar 14. on 25th may 2010, the petitioner filed an application in the aar under chapter xix b of the income tax act, 1961 ( act ) for determination of certain questions regarding its tax liability in respect of the services rendered by it under the above contract. the ito (international taxation .....

Anup Joshi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... the office about the violent incident and had rushed back home to learn the details of what had happened. 35. the appellant relies on shivsharanappa and ors. v. state of karnataka (2013) 5 scc 705, surjit singh and anr. v. state of punjab air 1994 sc 110 and lalla @ raj kumar singh v. state of u.p. 2004 ( ..... of the appellant and saw for themselves blood coming out in large quantity from the gap between the door and the floor. someone from the neighbourhood informed the police control room (pcr) which passed on the information to the police station where it was logged vide dd no.4a (mark x) at 9.15 am. the matter ..... offence, which is the subject matter under the present factual matrix. the evidence led about previous conviction seeks to throw light on, and prove, the previous commission of acts resulting in physical injuries inflicted by the appellant on the deceased and her sister, betraying the aggressive disposition towards them, and consequentially the motive, as relevant under section 8 .....

Mcdonald s India Private Limited Vs. Vikram Bakshi and Others

Court : Delhi

..... be granted if the continuation of foreign arbitration proceedings were to be oppressive, vexatious or unconscionable. 43. in essel sports pvt. ltd. v. board of control for cricket in india and others: ilr (2011) v delhi 585, the plaintiff (bcci) had prayed for a perpetual injunction against espl from initiating any ..... msm satellite (singapore) pte. ltd: 2014 (11) scc 639. the appellant had relied on chatterjee petrochem (supra) to submit that section 5 of the 1996 act, which bars judicial intervention by judicial authorities in respect of arbitration agreements would also be applicable to international agreements. in chatterjee petrochem (supra), reliance was, in turn, ..... that the trend is to minimize interference with arbitration process as that is the forum of choice. that is also the policy discernible from the 1996 act. courts must be extremely circumspect and, indeed, reluctant to thwart arbitration proceedings. thus, while courts in india may have the power to injunct arbitration .....

M/S. the Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd., Having Its Registered ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(Del)239

..... madras during a certain period throughout which the sale or purchase of iron and steel products was controlled by the iron and steel (control of production and distribution) order, 1941, issued under the defense of india act, 1939 and which was administered by the iron and steel controller in calcutta. the procedure followed was as follows : the purchaser placed the order for materials according ..... to the specifications given by him through the iron & steel controller, agreeing that the indent was placed subject to the provisions of the sale .....

Indian Radiological and Imaging Association (Iria) and Others Vs. Unio ...

Court : Delhi

..... science which includes training and the training if any required for conducting prenatal diagnostic procedures has to be by inclusion in the schedules to the mci act. the supreme court in mci vs. state of karnataka (1998) 6 scc 131 reiterated in dr. preeti srivastava vs. the state of maharashtra (1999) 7 scc 120 held that fixation of admission capacity in medical ..... machines and like. it is not as if prior to the coming into force of the pndt act the ultrasound machines were in the hands of persons other than doctors'. even in diagnostic centres where technicianswere operating the ultrasound machines, they were under the control and supervision of doctorsand it was the doctorswho were preparing and signing the reports of ultrasound diagnosis .....

Sauranshu Sinha and Others Vs. Union of India, Through Its Secretary a ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... of 2003 and, therefore, they cannot challenge the said list. in support of this, a reference has been made to the case of b. sriniwasa reddy vs. karnataka urban water supply and drainage board employees association and others, air (2006) sc 3106 (paras 49, 58 and 68 of the judgment). it is true that the ..... prior to their coming to force, erstwhile rules of 1962 continued to govern the matter prescribed therein. 63. in view of a large number of cadre controlling ministries/offices having their own respective cadre in respect of section officer grade, determination of actual number of vacancies has always been problematic and has been subjected ..... appointment when the right of the applicants had already accrued. shri gupta emphatically claimed that the applicants herein are indeed aggrieved persons in terms of administrative tribunals act, 1985 as about 760 persons have been added over and above the applicants in violation of the statutory recruitment rules. the applicants are eligible in law .....

Management of CPWD Vs. Abdul Gaffar and Others

Court : Delhi

..... therefore, it was contended that the tribunal was right in directing the workmen concerned to be regularised and that the law laid down in umadevi (3) [state of karnataka v. umadevi (3), (2006) 4 scc 1 : had no application to cases of industrial adjudication. xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx 27. further, it is very clear from ..... almost obliterated the distinction between the two jurisdictions. while exercising jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari, the high court may annul or set aside the act, order or proceedings of the subordinate courts but cannot substitute its own decision in place thereof. in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction the high court may not ..... terminated the services of the workmen with effect from 30.08.2000 arbitrarily. against the impugned termination of services, a complaint under section 33a of industrial dispute act, 1947 was also filed before the conciliation officer. but the same ended in failure because of non cooperative attitude of the management. it was alleged that .....

Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Trade and Taxes

Court : Delhi

..... to 29 november 2005. the corresponding entries in the legislations in uttarakhand and maharashtra also read differently. as far as the karnataka vat act 2003 is concerned, schedule iii of the said act in entry 53 mentions it products including telecommunication equipments as may be notified'. thereafter by a separate notification various kinds of ..... other state legislations 39. this court has been shown vat legislations of the states and in particular, the legislations of andhra pradesh, assam, bihar, gujarat, karnataka, maharashtra, mizoram and orissa. the above basic entry in the list finalised by the empowered committee has been more or less reproduced in the same manner ..... context of an ambiguity in entry 18 of para 5 of part vii (a) of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act that punctuation marks by themselves do not control the meaning of a statute when its meaning is otherwise obvious ?. in afcons infrastructure ltd. v. cherian varkey construction co. pvt. ltd. .....

Director of Income-tax (Exemption) Vs. All India Personality Enhanceme ...

Court : Delhi

..... hotel and lodging association, educational institute v. cbdt: (2008) 301 itr 86 (sc). (4) vishvesvaraya technological university v. acit: (2014) 362 itr 279 (karnataka). submissions on behalf of the assessee 23. countering the arguments advanced on behalf of the revenue, mr ajay vohra, learned senior counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that ..... universities, hospitals and other medical institutions. 8.1 under the provisions of clauses (22) and ( 22a) of section 10 of the income-tax act, before amendment, educational and medical institutions enjoyed a blanket exemption from income-tax if they existed solely for educational purposes and not for the purposes of ..... profit. in the absence of any monitoring mechanism for checking the genuineness of their activities, these provisions have been misused. 8.2 the act omits the aforesaid clause (22) and (22a) from the statute. the exemption would, however, continue in respect of any university or other educational institution .....

Fairdeal Polychem LLP and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... ) 26. india is a signatory to article vi of gatt and the said agreement of 1994. in pursuance of the same, amendments were made in the said act (customs tariff act, 1975) in 1995 and, inter alia, new section 9a was inserted. the said rules have been framed in exercise of powers conferred by section 9a(6) ..... or varied and is therefore no longer warranted. (1b) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1) or (1a), any definitive anti-dumping duty levied under the act, shall be effective for a period not exceeding five years from the date of its imposition, unless the designated authority comes to a conclusion, on a review initiated ..... principal act. ? similarly, in prahlad sharma v. state of u.p. [(2004) 4 scc 113 : 2004 scc (lands) 621] , the phrase mutatis mutandis has been explained as under: (scc p. 120, para 11) 11. the expression mutatis mutandisitself implies applicability of any provision with necessary changes in points of detail. ? (see also mariyappa v. state of karnataka [( .....