Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Sorted by: old Court: delhi Page 1 of about 397 results (0.953 seconds)

Dec 23 1966 (HC)

Rabinder Nath Malik Vs. Regional Passport Officer, New Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi1

..... u.s. supreme court in (1964) 12 law ed. (2d) 992, the court there was concerned with the question of the constitutionality of the subversive activities control act, douglas j. has in his separate judgment after referring to the earlier decision in (1958) 2 law ed. (2d) 1204 observed, inter alia, that free ..... arrest and detention in certain cases. article 21 which directly concerns us has already been reproduced verbatim. under the heading 'right against exploitation', article 23 prohibits traffic in human beings and forced labour, this prohibition being again of universal application. similarly, article 24 taboos employment of children below the age of 14 years ..... without holding that art. 21 takes within its ambit the liberty of entering the territory of india that right can legitimately be held to be regulated and controlled according to the procedure established by law, thereby excluding challenge to its constitutionality on the basis of article 21. ntohing cogent has been urged at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 1967 (HC)

The Municipal Committee, Simla Vs. A.R. Pasricha and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 3(1967)DLT612

..... , if satisfied that the goods have been actually re-exported, and that a.r. pasricha & co. the delay was due to circumstances over which the applicant had no control, grant refund of the amount paid. (5)officers in charge of barriers shall each day send to the head office the books of counterfoil of transit passes, and the ..... claimed up to the date of ntoice and it has been conceded by the learned counsel for the respondent that the same could nto be allowed under the interest act. he, however, claimed that it should be allowed under the equitable jurisdiction of this court in asmuch as the amount had been contumaciously withheld by the committee in ..... enter the time 'accordingly in column 10 of the transit pass in form o.2: provided, that in case or (mtoor vehicle) traffic the period allowed shall nto exceed one hour and for toher traffic two hours except in special curcumstances with the previous sanction of government. (4)when such goods could nto be exported within the period fixed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1967 (HC)

J.W. Benon Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT483

..... some of the buildings, such as restaurant buildings and tea stalls, survived and escaped damage. i hey also stated that in view of the ever-increasing tourist traffic and profitable business conditions, the petitioners had desired to re-build and renovate the buildings, wherever necessary, and also to moderanise the same, and for that purpose ..... to sell the same at a particular rate. the two merchants thereupon filed a single writ petition challenging, inter alia, that the action taken under the foodgrains control order was void in view of articles 14, 19(1)(f), 19(1)(g), and 31 of the constitution, read with article 13. a preliminary objection ..... housing society. land acquistion proceedings were started in respect of the said bungalows. the land acquisition officer issued ntoices under section 9 of the land acquisition act to the petitioners. the petitioners appeared before him and made their representations. the land acquisition officer had nto given his final award and yet steps were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1968 (HC)

ishwar Devi Malik and ors. Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary to ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi183; ILR1968Delhi59

..... safety of the public who travel by public conveyances like the bus in question is the primary concern of the conductor and the driver who are in charge of and control of public conveyances. when the conductor saw that the deceased. sham lal, was boarding the bus and was yet on the foot-board, he should nto have ..... to motor vehicles. the present sections 110 to 110-f were substituted in the place of the old section 110 by section 80 of the motor vehicles (amendment) act, 1956 (act no. 100 of 1956), and were intended to provide a cheaper and speedier remedy by way of an application before a claims tribunal instead of the remedy of ..... and it is also obvious that, in the subsequent century that has elapsed, the volume of motor traffic and the statistics of motor accidents, fatal or otherwise, must both have originated and increased beyond all proportions. in this prospective, the legislature has deliberately enacted the motor vehicles act, and provided by virtue of sections 110 to 110-f of that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1969 (HC)

The Uttar Pradesh Samaj Co-operative Housebuilding Society Ltd., New D ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 6(1970)DLT554

..... the problem of land and housing became acute and it and its solution depended upon the successful handling of the problems of overcrowding, in sanitation, traffic hazards and sub standard construction. the affidavit of shri bahuguna. further shows that the citizens of delhi who wished to construct houses for bona fide ..... agricultural land evacuee lands were acquired by the central government for rehabilitation of displaced persons under section 12 of the displaced persons compensation and rehabilitation) act. the lands were thereafter transferred and sanads about the transfer of those lands were issued. the question as to whether an allottee obtains permanent property ..... ) rules have been made by the central government in exercise of the powers conferred by sec- corporation 40 of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act of 1954. ' according to rule 49 of the rules, except as otherwise provided, a displaced persons having a verified claim in respect of agricultural land .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 1969 (HC)

Ram Kishore Rastogi Vs. the Appellate Officer, Jaisalmer House

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1969Delhi989

..... to be quashed. the high court of andhra pradesh, for instance, regards a period of six months as reasonable (see vekata subbu v. d.t.s. (traffic) vijayawada followed in edara venkaiah and others v. the commissioner of income-fax department, hyderabad but in extra-ordinary circumstances the high court may in its dicrection excuse ..... was dealing with a petition under article 226 of the constitution for grant of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the orders of the chief controller of imports and exports, new delhi. the petitioner in that case died during the pendency of the petition whereupon an application was filed by some of ..... event the respondents originally imp leaded in the writ petition including dr. siddiquee, had expressed their intention before the competent officer appointed under the evacuee property (separation) act, 1951 that they were nto interested in the property in dispute and as such the said officer was fully justified in selling the property by public auction. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1969 (HC)

Labh Singh Atma Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi171

..... fully discussed and reasoned order. it was not shown to be wrong in any respect. further, the merits of the questions decided therein are for the officer acting under the act to decide. it is not for this court to go into the merits as this court is not sitting in appeal over those orders.17. the learned ..... to give oral hearing to an applicant, inasmuch as the likelihood of injustice being done to an applicant after he had oral hearing before a number of officers acting under the act was very small. but if the central government wwere of the view that a certain point could not be understood by it except in oral hearing, it ..... holding that the property was not divisible.the revision of the petitioner to the chief settlement commissioner under section 24(1) of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 1954 hereinafter called 'the act'), was dismissed by shri n. p. dube, chief settlement commissioner, on 20th may 1963, as per annexure 'f' to the writ petition, firstly on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1969 (HC)

Rajendra Sareen Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi132

..... permission to request the press correspondents that the above statement should be treated as off the record. respondent no. 2 resented the petitioner's request although he accepted and acted upon the suggestion. respondent no. 2 denied the incident and stated in his affidavit that he did not recall having made any such statement. he also stated that personally ..... the state of haryana on 1-11-1966. along with the post the services of the petitioner were also turned over by the central government under the punjab reorganisation act, 1966, to the state of haryana.5. from 1-12-1966 to 24-3-1967 the services of the petitioner were lent on deputation by the state of ..... was created at that time. in between the petitioner was granted extraordinary leave for a period of six months from 21st november 1959 to 18th may 1960 with permission to act as a special correspondent of the hindustan times, new delhi in pakistan, on a salary of rs. 1500 per mensem. on return from leave the petitioner resumed his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1969 (HC)

Raj Pal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1969Delhi1099

..... (b)twice of an offence under section 6 of section 11 of the bombay prevention of begging act, 1959 (bombay act x of 1960) as extended to delhi, or under the suppression of immoral traffic in women and girls act, 1956 (central act 104 of 1956), or (c)thrice of an offence within a period of three years under the ..... delhi gambling act, 1955 (delhi act ix of 1955) or under the punjab excise act, 1914 (punjab act 1 of 1914), as extended to delhi the district ..... quashing the proceedings which have been initiated against him in the court of additional district magistrate, (central district), delhi, and for holding the provisions of the bombay police act to be ultra vires. the respondents imp leaded in the petition are union of india through lieutenant governor, delhi, and shri v. k. kapoor, additional district magistrate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 01 1970 (HC)

1. Mrs. Kailash Suneja (C.W. No. 5220 of 1993 and C.M. No. 1988 of 199 ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1998]231ITR318(Delhi); [1998]97TAXMAN144(Delhi)

..... of arriving at the market value is the rent capitalisation method; (6) encumbrance of tenancy is very material because section 16(6) of the delhi rent control act, 1958, prohibits a purchaser from filing a suit for eviction within five years from the date of purchase. the assumption that the potential of the terrace ..... jtsc 544 .7. shantistar builders v. narayan khimalal totame : air1990sc630 .8. prabhakaran nair v. state of tamil nadu : [1988]1scr1 .9. mohini jain (miss) v. state of karnataka : [1992]3scr658 .10. vincent panikurlangara v. union of india : [1987]2scr468 .11. ramsharan autyanuprasi v. union of india : air1989sc549 .12. all india imam organization v. union of ..... record, no inference can be drawn nor conclusion can be arrived at that because of proximity to a particular place, there would be a problem of traffic and vehicular pollution.despite these facts, the appropriate authority in sub-para (4) of para 5 compared the property under consideration with the sale instance .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //