Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: delhi Page 25 of about 397 results (0.079 seconds)

Autar Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi92; 1978RLR405

..... , in the above decision, observed that the magistrate had 'wide power'; the dropping of the expression 'or suspicion' has eliminated the power of the magistrate to act 'on suspicion'.(13) the genesis of the above was that the law commission of india, in its 41st report, expressed its displeasure in the matter of criminal courts ..... magistrate as an accused) has to be appreciated.(11) the entire scheme in this respect of the code of criminal procedure, as it stood prior to the new code (act 2 of 1974), has been fully explained by vaidialingam, j speaking for the supreme court in abhinandan jha v. dinesh mishra : 1968crilj97 . i shall, thereforee, content ..... ); the stage for so acting had not even arrived.(25) i have found it necessary to exercise jurisdiction under section 482 criminal procedure code . in the light of the background of facts i have mentioned. the law on this question has been explained by chandrachud, j., speaking for the supreme court in state of karnataka v. l. muniswamy and .....

Suraj Prakash Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998IAD(Delhi)301; AIR1998Delhi236; 71(1998)DLT532; 1998(44)DRJ251; 1998RLR10

..... executions'. learned counsel for the appellants on the basis of the above have argued that admittedly the appellants have been in occupation since 1948. they while acting upon the license raised permanent structures. thus they are not liable to eviction. the contention of the learned counsel is without any merit.'36. bar ..... commissioner was rightly rejected. the revision petition was also rightly dismissed by the deputy chief settlement commissioner. similarly the petition under section 33 of the act against the order of the deputy chief settlement commissioner was rightly dismissed. the orders with regard to the sale of the disputed property and its subsequent ..... said order. however, the revision petition was also dismissed on september 13, 1961 by the deputy chief settlement commissioner. petition under section 33 of the act against the order passed by the deputy chief settlement commissioner was dismissed as communicated to the appellants by letter dated december 21, 1961. the orders with .....

H.M.M. Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1980CENCUS340D

..... situated in nabha (punjab) and rajahnmndry (andhra pradesh). all the produce, however, is sent by road transport to packing stations located at faridabad (haryana), bangalore (karnataka) and howrah (west bengal) where they are got packed by independent contractors. for example, the powder manufactured at nabha is sent from time to time in steel ..... and boost. these products fall under tariff item no. i-b of the list set out in the first schedule to the central excises and salt act, 1944 ('the act') viz. 'prepared or preserved foods put up in unit containers and ordinarily intended forsale...'. excise duty is livable on them ad valorem on the assessable ..... this objection, the order in revision, ignores it. moreover, the oral evidence was also categorical that, apart from the consignment sales for which the agents only acted as intermediaries, there were outright sales of goods to the selling agents which, after adding their profit, they sold themselves-though such sales were only to the .....

Kundan Lal Vij Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi493

..... upper subordinates by range deputy inspector-general and assistant inspector general, provincial additional police (designated as commandant, provincial additional police and assistant inspector-general of police, traffic). no appeal lies against an order of discharge.'(26) in dharam singh case, it was held by the supreme court that where the service rules fixed ..... to the statement government shall deem fit. section 12 of the said act empowers the inspector general of police to frame from time to time subject to the approval of the state government such orders and rules as he ..... by the decisions of the supreme court in sant ram sharma v. state of rajasthan and others : (1968)iillj830sc . further section 4 of the police act, 1861, vests the administration of police throughout a general policedistrict in the inspector-general of police and in such deputy inspector general and assistant inspectors general as .....

Audyogic Karamcham Group Housing Society Limited Vs. Delhi Development ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 14(1978)DLT110

..... 2)whether the directions given by the central government to the delhi development authority regarding the disposal of nazul land could be issued only under the delhi development act, 1957 particularly under section 22(3) thereof o)- also under article 298 in exercise of executive power and the difference between the ambits of relevant considerations ..... commissioner, delhi : air1968delhi146 . this decision holds that while the provisions of article 14 of the constitution would not be attracted, the government is expected to act in consonance with the principle of fair play even while extending concessions to citizens and treat them as far as possible on equal basis. we do not understand ..... 21) if the content of the considerations which may justify the government in granting land under section 22(3) is not supplied by the delhi development act then the ambit in which these considerations can operate is much wider under article 298. the considerations urged by the petitioner for grant of land are .....

Coastal Andhra Power Limited Vs. Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribu ...

Court : Delhi

..... conciliation act, 1996 (act) against the andhra pradesh central power distribution company limited (apcpdcl), andhra pradesh southern power distribution company limited (apspdcl), andhra pradesh eastern power distribution company limited (apepdcl) and andhra pradesh northern power distribution company limited (apnpdcl) as well as seven other state electricity boards in karnataka, maharashtra ..... performance of its obligations under this agreement, but only if and to the extent that such events or circumstances are not within the reasonable control, directly or in indirectly, of the affected party and could not have been avoided if the affected party had taken reasonable care or complied ..... 12.7 read as under:- 12.4 force majeure exclusions force majeure shall not include (i) any event or circumstance which is within the reasonable control of the parties and (ii) the following conditions, except to the extent that they are consequence of an event of force majeure: a. unavailability, .....

Wazirpur Bartan Nirmata Sangh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 103(2003)DLT654

..... for private purpose and that it is the duty of the competent authorities to remove encroachment which are a constant source of unhygienic conditions, ecological problems, traffic hazard and a risk even to pedestrians.27. the supreme court in the aforesaid judgment held that there cannot be any right for alternative accommodation to the ..... of shifting. till completion of the project and handing over of the services to the concerned local bodies, the executing agency will exercise the necessary building controls and ensure that the construction activities go on as per the approved plans and building plans. in case, the allottee fails to build even a single ..... state for ejectment of encroachers on public land. in fact normally such encroachers should not be provided with alternative accommodation as it would only encourage the illegal act of encroachment. the supreme court in almitra h. patel's case (supra), thus observed that creation of slums has become a good and well organized business .....

Rishikesh Balkishandas and Others Vs. I. D. Manchanda, Income-tax Offi ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1987]167ITR49(Delhi); [1987]34TAXMAN305(Delhi)

..... before the supreme court was 'whether it is obligatory upon the court which convicts a person for an offence under section 3(1) of the suppression of immoral traffic in women and girls act, 1956, to pass a sentence of imprisonment where the conviction is in respect of a first offence for a term of not less than one year and not ..... supreme court in state of karnataka v. pratap chand : 1981crilj595 , a person is liable to be convicted for an offence committed by the firm if he was in charge of, and responsible to, the firm for ..... be imposed on the firm.it was next contended that there were no evidence to prove that the partners of the firm, accused nos. 2 to 5, were in overall control of day to day business of the firm, accused no. 1, and in the absence of such evidence, no charge could be framed against those accused.as held by the .....

Dr. Prannoy Roy and anr. Vs. Cit and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (2002)172CTR(Del)465

..... directing the assessed to file a return but also in a given case can take recourse to the provisions of sub-sections 147 and 148 of the said act.24. the decisions of the karnataka high court in dr. s. reddappa (supra) and patna high court in ranchi club ltd. v. cit & ors. : [1996]217itr72(patna) , whereupon mr. khanna placed ..... is levied under the relevant provisions points to the nature of the levy.'8. in union home products ltd. v. union of india & anr. : [1995]215itr758(kar) , the karnataka high court inter alias held that while looking to the basis for calculation, period of calculation and nature thereof must be considered for the purpose of holding that it was ..... , on the other hand, the contention of the assessed is that in a situation of this nature, where the assessed could not file a return for reasons beyond his control, it is not liable to pay interest as thereby the revenue does riot suffer any loss inasmuch as tax although strictly not in terms of definition of advance tax as .....

P.K. BhasIn Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1992Delhi116; 1991LabIC1904

..... 56) we cannot do better than quote from the judgment of crinnapp reddy, j. in the case of k. c. vasanth kumar and another v. state of karnataka, : air1985sc1495 : 'one of the results of the superier, elitist approach is that the question of reservation is invariably viewed as the conflict between the merit arian principle ..... to the service is made, the incumbent works totally free from the interference of the government, and during the course of his tenure, remains entirely under the control, disciplinary and otherwise, of the high court, as envisaged in article 235, except at the stage where he is to be dismissed or removed from service, ..... other authority would mean direct recruitment otherwise than by open competition. these rosters, provide specific points for members of scheduled tribes. delhi high court has thus acted with full legal and constitutional authority in following the 40 point roster, and keeping points reserved for scheduled tribes as provided therein. that being so, the .....