Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka repealing and amending act 2002 section 2 definitions Court: allahabad Page 7 of about 169 results (0.121 seconds)

C.M. Pandey S/O Dr. C.S. Pandey Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary, A ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2668

..... laid down in the judgment would bind only hansa corporation, who has approached the supreme court and not the other petitioners against whom the state of karnataka hand not filed any appeal. according to the aforesaid judgment to do so, would be to ignore the binding nature of a judgment of this court ..... under the question for consideration was whether the earlier decision of the high court regarding the unconstitutionality of section 4(1) of the west bengal criminal law amendment act, would be binding between the parties and the correctness could not be collaterally or incidentally challenged'? the court held that it would not be permissible ..... agricultural produce market board officers and staff establishment regulations, 1984 or in state agricultural produce market committee centralize service rules, 1984 and there has been no amendment in the said regulations and there has been no approval by the state government and it has also not been notified in the gazette, therefore, the appointment .....

Waqf Mausooma Syed HusaIn and Mst. Wali Begum and anr. Vs. Dillep Kuma ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2003All371

..... compensation and prayer to condone the delay in filing such application. in that case the occasion to take the benefit of the provision for condonation of delay arose only after repeal of the old act. that was not a case of a pending suit but the claim petition was filed after the new motor vehicles act. in : [1977]1scr563 ..... 8, rule 1 would not be applicable to pending suits and although the provision is procedural retrospectivity is textually inadmissible. learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the amended order 8, rule 1 should be so interpreted as to mean that the time of 30 days provided therein would start running in pending suits from the date ..... failed' to file the written statement within 30 days of service provided under the main provision. the proviso would therefore be applicable only to cases where the main amended provision applies as the exercise of the power under it is contingent to the failure to file the written statement within 30 days from the date of service. .....

Ajeet Singh Alias Muraha Son of Vijay Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007CriLJ170

..... fides against the informant are of no consequence and cannot by themselves be the basis for quashing the proceedings. (emphasis added).44. in m. narayandas v. state of karnataka and ors. : 2004crilj822 , the apex court rejected the contention that proceedings were liable to be quashed as the same stood initiated on account of personal vendetta observing ..... are accused of having committed the cognizable offence. obviously, the power has to be exercised with caution and circumspection.(emphasis added).10. in m. narayandas v. state of karnataka and ors. : 2004crilj822 , the apex court held that at the stage when a report of a cognizable offence under section 154(1) of the code is lodged, ..... in order to give effect to the law laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in this case, the provisions of the code have been amended by code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 2005 by which section 50a has been inserted. it requires the police to give information about the arrest of the person as well as .....

Oriental Bank of Commerce Through Its Senior Manager, Sh. Shyam Sunder ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008[12]STR423; [2009]20STT529

..... pass from the patient or client to the doctor or lawyer for the documents in both cases.12. recently, in respect to an advertising agency, the applicability of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 in view of the fact that it was already subject to payment of service tax under finance tax act, 1994 came up for consideration ..... para-44 of the judgment in bharat sanchar nigam ltd. (supra), the apex court said:of all the different kinds of composite transactions the drafters of the 46th amendment chose three specific situations, a works contract, a hire-purchase contract and a catering contract to bring within the fiction of a deemed sale. of these three, the ..... union of india and ors. : [2006]282itr273(sc) , but the apex court observed that though to some extent the principle enunciated in gannon dunkerley stood modified by 46th amendment yet it has survived in two respects. in para 43 of the judgment the court has said that with respect to definition of 'sale', for the purpose of constitution .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ashok Kumar Dixit

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2005)195CTR(All)375; [2005]273ITR126(All)

..... or act, becomes functus officio so far as that particular act is concerned and it cannot itself interpret it. no doubt, the legislature retains the power to amend or repeal the law so made and can also declare its meaning, but it can be done only by making another law or statute after undertaking the whole process of ..... shall be allowed only where the payment is received by the employee on his retirement, whether on superannuation or otherwise. the combined effect of the two aforesaid amendments will be that payments received by an employee in respect of any period of leave not availed of by him will be exempt from income-tax only in ..... the receipt by way of leave encashment paid to the employee at the time of retirement on superannuation is specifically exempted from inclusion in the recipients total income. the said amendment as is clear from the finance act, 1982, has been given retrospective effect with effect from april 1, 1978. the legislature by inserting clause (va) in section .....

Mithlesh Kumar Tripathi S/O Late Shri V.S. Tripathi Vs. the Commission ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2005)199CTR(All)511; [2006]280ITR16(All)

..... the provisions to ensure coherence, and consistency within the law as a whole and to avoid undesirable consequence.'(underlined by us to lay emphasis)4. : 1993crilj1029 state of karnataka v. appa balu ingale and ors. '34...judge must be a jurist endowed with the legislator's wisdom, historian's search for truth, prophet's vision, capacity ..... ) of the act in as much as the apprehension, if any, to destroy material/informant subsequently also cannot be ruled out particularly when 'assessee' has a right to amend later his return at any stage.62. learned counsel for the department submitted that this court, may issue a 'mandamus' to the revenue to supply 'reasons' within specified ..... on behalf of the department admits that even after 'revised-return' is filed in pursuance to the notice under section 148(2) of the act, one can still amend/ revise said revised return. from the above it is clear, that apparently there is no 'object' or 'purpose' in sight which seems to be achieved and also .....

Km. Savitri Devi and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC2240

..... 311 of the constitution though he was also entitled for payment of remuneration as honorarium.15. similar issue came up for consideration before the apex court recently in state of karnataka and ors. v. ameerbi and ors. : jt 2007 (1) sc 279 : 2006 (7) awc 7424 (sc), where the angan bari workers were engaged on payment of honorarium under a scheme ..... -section (1a) in place of the person who has resigned:provided also that a person appointed as the president or as a member, before the commencement of the consumer protection (amendment) act, 2002, shall continue to hold such office as president or member, as the case may be, till the completion of his term.(3) the salary or honorarium and other .....

Chandra Prakash Agrawal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2006)206CTR(All)505; [2006]287ITR172(All)

..... the enactment (see union of india v. g.m. kokil [1984] supp. scc 196; chandavarkar sita ratna rao v. ashalata s. guram : [1986]3scr866 ; r.s. raghunath v. state of karnataka : air1992sc81 ; g.p. singh's principles of statutory interpretation.)28. the principles laid down in the aforesaid cases have been reiterated by the apex court in the case of iridium ..... found during the search and does not include the income which has been discovered on the basis of post-search enquiries made during the block assessment proceeding. however, after the amendment made by the finance act, 2002, the assessment of undisclosed income can only be based on the evidence found in the search and the material or information gathered in post .....

U.P. Zila Parishad Karamchari Sangh and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2002)3UPLBEC2569

..... to panchayats in force in a state immediately before the commencement of the constitution (seventy-third amendment) act, 1992, which is inconsistent with the provisions of this part, shall continue to be in force until amended or repealed by a competent legislature or other competent authority or until the expiration of one year from such ..... of this article, it is evident that the existing laws relating to panchayats enforced in a state immediately before the commencement of the constitution (seventy-third amendment) act, 1992 will continue to remain in operation. only those provisions of such existing laws as are inconsistent with part ix of the constitution of india ..... period mentioned in article 243n.43. hence, the u.p. adhiniyam, 1961 has continued to remain in operation even after the commencement of seventy-third constitutional amendment. section 99 of the u.p. adhiniyam, 1961 which provides, inter-alia, for establishment of zila nidhi fund is evidently referable to article 243h(d) .....

Dr. V.S. Chauhan and Another Vs. Director of Income Tax Investigations ...

Court : Allahabad

..... others v. mukut adhikari and others jt 2011(3) sc 84.34. the scope of section 133(6), second proviso was considered by the apex court in the case of karnataka bank ltd. v. secretary govt. of india and others, (2002) 255 itr 508, it has been held that with a view to collect information power is given under section 133 .....