Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka repealing and amending act 2002 section 2 definitions Page 1 of about 9,029 results (0.619 seconds)

Sep 18 2007 (HC)

Sugalabai Vs. Gundappa A. Maradi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR4790; 2008(2)KarLJ406

..... any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state.(emphasis supplied)35. as, at the time when the karnataka amendment act, 1990 was brought into force, the central amending act of 2005 was not in existence and as the central enactment which was in existence ..... centre intended to omit section 6a(d) of the karnataka amendment act, then, it would have declared its intention as it had done in the case of section 23 of the principal act. therefore, unless the state amendment act stood repealed by the central amendment act, the inference to be drawn is that both the amending acts will stay in the field and both will operate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2000 (HC)

John B. James and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Anoth ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR4134; 2001(1)KarLJ364

..... exercise of power conferred by clause (1) of article 213 of the constitution of india, promulgated bangalore development authority (amendment) (repealing) ordinance, 2000 (karnataka ordinance 4 of 2000), repealing bangalore development authority (amendment) act, 1999 (karnataka act 1 of 2000). petitioners have thereafter amended their writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of said ordinance on several grounds. we will refer to each of those grounds and deal ..... : 'bda' for bangalore development authority; 'bda act' for the bangalore development authority act, 1976; 'amendment act' for the bangalore development authority (amendment) act, 1999 (karnataka act 1 of 2000); and 'repealing ordinance' for the bangalore development authority (amendment) (repealing) ordinance, 2000 (karnataka ordinance no. 4 of 2000); 'kmc act' for karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976; 'planning act' for karnataka town and country planning act, 1961; 'public premises act' for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2004 (HC)

Sharma Transports, Rep. by Suresh Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Karnataka, ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR80; 2005(1)KarLJ539

..... levying and collecting any casetax of 5% on the motor vehicles under section 3a of the karnataka motor vehicles taxation act as amended by act vii of 1995, act iv of 1998 and act iv of 2002 in view of the karnataka repealing and amending act, xxii of 2000.29. in the result, these petitions are allowed in the above ..... purpose of this section bangalore city planning area means bangalore city planning area as declared under section 4a of the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 (karnataka act 1 of 1963)'. this was amended in 1998 and the amendment provides for the words 'for the purpose of bangalore mass rapid transit system' the words 'for a period of ..... from 15.4.2002.2. the pleadings of the parties are as under:the first respondent introduced an amendment to the karnataka motor vehicles taxation act, 1957. by an amendment a new power to imposition of cess was statutorily introduced. the amendment by act no. vii of 1995 inserted sec.3a. annexure 'a' is the notification. section 3a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2005 (HC)

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by Its Managing Direc ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR1605

..... ) points (f) & (g):- in w.p.nos. 8512-13/2004 the petitioners have prayed for quashing section 3 of amendment act (karnataka act no. 9 of 2003) by which the kcca act is repealed. mr. m.c. narasimhan, learned senior counsel for the petitioners has mainly relied upon the constitutional bench decisions of the apex ..... india which has received the assent of the president of india. the same cannot be repealed by the state legislature in exercise of its power from a different entry, entry 57 of list ii of vii schedule to amend the karnataka motor vehicles (taxation) act 1957, which is without legislative power and which has not ..... employee, the prayer is to quash section 3 of karnataka act no. 9/2003 (karnataka motor vehicles taxation and certain other law (amendment) act, 2003, (hereinafter referred to as 'the amendment act') by which the karnataka contract carriages (acquisition) act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'kcca act') has been repealed, the constitutional validity of it was upheld by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2004 (HC)

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation and Etc. Etc. Vs. Karnataka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant205

..... points (f) and (g) :- in w. p. nos. 8512-13/2004 the petitioners have prayed for quashing section 3 of amendment act (karnataka act no. 9 of 2003) by which the kcca act is repealed. mr. m. c. narasimhan, learned senior counsel for the petitioners has mainly relied upon the constitution bench decisions of the apex court ..... india which has received the assent of the president of india. the same cannot be repealed by the state legislature in exercise of its power from a different entry, entry 57 of list ii of vii schedule to amend the karnataka motor vehicles (taxation) act 1957, which is without legislative power and which has not ..... , the prayer is to quash section 3 of karnataka act no. 9/2003' (karnataka motor vehicles taxation and certain other law (amendment) act, 2003, (hereinafter referred to as 'the amendment act') by which the karnataka contract carriages (acquisition) act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'kcca act'), has been repealed, the constitutional validity of it was upheld by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2017 (HC)

J Venkatesh Reddy Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... be constructed as legislation by reference. where a statute is cited by reference in another statute, any repeal or amendment of statute that is cited by reference is automatically carried over into referring statute. 86 section 36 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 and the bangalore development authorities act, 1976 are in all material particulars ..... section 11-15a part iii part iv part -v125as such, it is evident that specific chapter titles have been bodily lifted into the kiad act. any subsequent amendment, repeal or re-enactment in the incorporated legislation will not affect the kiad act. the lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 act is deeming fiction and applies ..... (1) or section 17(3) of the 1894 act. it is contended that section 16(1) of the 1894 act and section 16(2) of the karnataka amendment act clearly envisages 150 that vesting takes place only after the award is passed that too when physical possession of the land is taken and compensation is paid. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2017 (HC)

J. Venkatesh Reddy and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented ...

Court : Karnataka

..... be constructed as legislation by reference. where a statute is cited by reference in another statute, any repeal or amendment of statute that is cited by reference is automatically carried over into referring statute. section 36 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 and the bangalore development authorities act, 1976 are in all material ..... iiiapportionment of compensationpart ivpayment of compensationpart -v as such, it is evident that specific chapter titles have been bodily lifted into the kiad act. any subsequent amendment, repeal or re-enactment in the incorporated legislation will not affect the kiad act. the lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 act is deeming fiction ..... ) or section 17(3) of the 1894 act. it is contended that section 16(1) of the 1894 act and section 16(2) of the karnataka amendment act clearly envisages that vesting takes place only after the award is passed that too when physical possession of the land is taken and compensation is paid. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2011 (HC)

Biocon Ltd. and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Ministry of Law Justice ...

Court : Karnataka

..... enactment imposing electricity tax linked to the production/generation of electricity. the said ordinance was promulgated on 16-10-2003. before the ordinance could expire, the karnataka amendment act no.5/2004 was enacted giving retrospective effect from the date of ordinance i.e., 16-10-2003 levying electricity tax on the persons producing ..... of the government as referred to above and therefore the provisions of the act as challenged in the act is constitutional and since ordinance has been repealed by the amendment act, it is unnecessary to deal with the validity of the ordinance. 5. the learned single judge after hearing the learned counsel appearing for ..... . the learned advocate general submitted that though the ordinance might have sought to levy tax on production, the said ordinance has lapsed and has been repealed as amending act was enacted even before the period of ordinance was over and therefore the constitutional validity of the ordinance was considered only for the purpose of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1992 (HC)

Syndicate Bank Vs. Vittal Bhat

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1992KAR991

..... amended by the said ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under the ..... more aspect which i have got to notice. section 11 of the karnataka rent control (amendment) act, 1975 which came to be referred to in periyakkal's case, provides as follows:-'11. repeal of ordinance no. 3 of 1975the karnataka rent control (amendment) ordinance, 1975 (karnataka ordinance no. 3 of 1975) is hereby repealed:provided that anything done or any action taken under the principal act as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2011 (HC)

M/S S R S Travels, Bangalore by Its Proprietor K T Rajashjekar and Oth ...

Court : Karnataka

..... sharmas case (referred supra) holding that the provisions of the kcca act were constitutional. the said act was repealed by the karnataka motor vehicles taxation and certain other law (amendment) act, 2003 (karnataka act no.9 of 2003) and the objects and reasons assigned thereto are as follows:- 214. the principal problem ..... nos.20, 23 and 24 of 2005 are dismissed. ii. we hold that section 3 of the karnataka motor vehicles taxation and certain other law (amendment) act, 2003 (karnataka act no.9/2003) repealing the provisions of the karnataka contract carriages (acquisition) act, 1976 is constitutional and to that extent, w.a. nos.170 to ..... and workers federation had locus standi to file that writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of repeal of the karnataka contract carriages (acquisition) act, 1976 by the karnataka motor vehicles taxation and certain other law (amendment) act, 2003 (karnataka act no.9 of 2003) is justified or calls for interference in these appeals? 2. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //