Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka repealing and amending act 2002 section 2 definitions Court: allahabad Page 5 of about 169 results (0.309 seconds)

May 21 2004 (HC)

Rakesh Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2234

..... v. uthanur srinivas and ors., 1992 (2) scc 61. in that decision, the supreme court was considering the power of the deputy commissioner under section 4 of karnataka zila parishad, taluk panchayat samithis, mandal panchayats and nyaya panchayats act, 1983. in the statutory provisions itself, the power to modify the order was given to the ..... of west bengal by issuing a notification in the official gazette. the bengal districts act, 1836, was made applicable to the state of uttar pradesh till it was repealed by u. p. act no. 1 of 1903. the power to create 'district' is vested with the state government. the purpose and object is obvious, i ..... is totally inapplicable. article 243q of the constitution has nothing to do with the creation and abolition of the district as the purpose of the aforesaid constitutional amendment is totally different. in abolishing nine districts and, four divisions and leaving four districts and one commissionary, care was taken for law and order problems, administrative .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2000 (HC)

Daya Shankar Pande Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC671; (2001)1UPLBEC741

..... or accrued right to continue even after rescission of the order. in m. s. shivananda v. karnataka state road transport corporation and others, (1980) 1 scc 149, the apex court while deciding rights of parties under ordinance which was saved by repealing act by using the expression, 'any thing done' or 'any action taken', held that while considering ..... in a. a. calton (supra) on which reliance was placed the apex court held that section 16f of the u. p. intermediate education act, 1921 was amended in 1975, and the power of director to grant approval was taken away but the proceedings for selection had commenced in 1973 and twice the deputy director of education had ..... the claim of the tenant that they had acquired vested right which could not be disturbed unless the amending act contained specific provision to that effect was repelled as the right of the tenant to resist eviction prior to the amending act, 'was nothing more than a right to take advantage of that enactment'. and once 'the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1987 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Dixit Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1987All235

..... held by majority that imposition of the mandatory death sentence violated the prohibition against the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth and fourteenth amendments. these cases are scarcely of any aid while interpreting the provisions of our constitution.136. sri jagdish swarup as well as sri rakesh dwivedi attacked ..... special court should be conducted in camera, violates guarantee of fair procedure, as ordained by article 21 of the constitution. it draws its strength from sixth amendment to the american constitution, which expressly provides that :'in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial....'89-b. ..... if the entrenchment is minimal, the act must be held as constitutionally valid. (i.t.c. ltd. v. state of karnataka. : 1984crilj668 , prem chand jain v. r.k. chhabra : [1981]129itr404(sc) . state of karnataka v. ranganatha reddy. : [1978]1scr641 .33. in this behalf, one cannot help recall the note of caution sounded by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2005 (HC)

Smt. Kesari Devi W/O Shri Gulab Singh, Chairman, Zila Panchayat Vs. St ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3563; 2005(3)ESC2209

..... haresh dayaram thakur v. state of maharashtra and ors., : air2000sc2281 ; delhi administration v. gurdip singh uban and ors., : (2000)7scc296 ; dhanajaya reddy v. state of karnataka air 2001 sc 1512; commissioner of income tax, mumbai v. anjum m.h. ghaswala and ors., : [2001]252itr1(sc) ; prabha shankar dubey v. state of madhya ..... desirable that the state government may consider the issue by providing other punishments proportionate to the delinquency committed by an elected office bearer by making suitable amendments in the 1961 act,171. the question of disqualification for further contesting the election is provided under the representation of the people act (hereinafter called ..... an office bearer has been examined in several decisions.democracy-a-basic feature:47. the petitioner holds the post of a adhyaksha, zila panchayat. amendment in the constitution by adding part ix and ix-a confers upon the local self government a complete autonomy on the basic democratic unit unshackled from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1994 (HC)

Varshney General Sales and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2003]130STC202(All)

..... as goods of special importance under that section with effect from 1st october, 1958, and simultaneously the declaration contained in section 7 of the 1957 act was repealed. it is significant, it is from that date tobacco under the u.p. sales tax act has been exempted from tax.16. placing reliance on the ..... classification.' 'the scope for permissible classification in a taxing statute was once again considered in a recent decision of this court in p.h. ashwathanarayana v. state of karnataka : air1989sc100 . after a review of earlier decisions, it was stated therein as under (para 30 of air) : 'it is for the state to decide what ..... manufactured by small-scale manufacturers but bearing brand name of a large scale manu-facturer unconstitutional since not passing the test of reasonable classification. stated objectives of amending notification not justify-ing the denial since still open to large scale manufacturer to get his goods manufactured from ssi units without brand name and then affix .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2000 (HC)

Bobby Alias Premveer and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4125

..... being asked to be produced before the court concerned for the purpose of interrogation, has not arisen. on the contrary, the p. t. warrant issued by the court, at karnataka is for production of the prisoner before the court and the p. t. warrant issued by the court at hyderabad is also for production of the prisoner before the court ..... of new code by reference to the acts, rules, regulations and paragraphs noted above.58. the prisoners (attendance in courts) act, 1955 is no more in vogue. it stood repealed when the new code came into being. similar provisions had been made in the new code by enacting section 267 as noted above. to say that the legislature does not ..... days, can an investigating agency obtain a police remand. the answer has been in an emphatic no. the provisions of section 167, cr.p.c. with all its amendments from time to time have been clubbed and discussed extensively in the said decision. the argument of the prosecution counsel was rejected to the extent that if and when the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2007 (HC)

S.K. Traders Through Its Proprietoress Smt. Kavita Maheshwari Vs. Addi ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2009)26VST601(All)

..... the same. collection in fact was made by the farmers and not by the assessee and the assessee only purchases those poppy seeds from the farmers.35. in state of karnataka and ors. v. c. lalitha : (2006)iillj93sc , the apex court has observed:a judgment, as is well known, is not to be read as a statute ..... bamboos will brigng them within the umbrella of expression 'manufacturer'. the view that tax lialbility has been prescribed at the manufacturers and importers point and therefore after the amendment traders who purchase the timber from unregistered dealers fall within the category of manufacturer is indefensible. there is no logic for such a conclusion, where the statutory ..... of himachal pradesh and ors. v. gujarat ambuja cement ltd. and anr. 2005 (6) scc 499.6. except for a period when article 226 was amended by the constitution (42nd amendment) act, 1976, the power relating to alternative remedy has been considered to be a rule of self imposed limitation. it is essentially a rule of policy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2011 (HC)

ishwar Chandra Gupta and ors Vs. State of U.P. and ors

Court : Allahabad

..... act in their applicability to the state only. such a state of affairs will exist only until parliament may at any time make a law adding to, or amending, varying or repealing the law made by the state legislature under the proviso to article 254. in paragraph 24 of the same judgment, the hon'ble supreme court further laid ..... be shown that the two enactments contain inconsistent and irreconcilable provisions, so that they cannot stand together or operate in the same field. 2.that there can be no repeal by implication unless the inconsistency appears on the face of the two statutes. 3. that where the two statutes occupy a particular filed, but there is room or ..... , 1927, in its application to uttar pradesh are not adequate to put an effective check on the activities of such offenders. it is, therefore, considered necessary to amend the said act in its application to uttar pradesh so as to equip the officers of the state government with more powers to deal with such offenders effectively and to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2002 (HC)

Anant Kumar Tiwari and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2002)2UPLBEC1327

..... bench decisions of this court, the argument that a citizen of this country has a fundamental right to trade in intoxicant liquor was once against emphatically repealed. that issue is, thus, no longer res integra.' learned standing counsel has further relied upon paragraph 19 of the aforesaid judgment, which reads as ..... such circumstances any criteria which provides district-wise selection is illegal and discriminatory and it is probably with this view that the original advertisement was amended by issuing a corrigendum changing the criterion from district-wise to state-wise. the cadre in service will come into existence only when a ..... possesses a degree or diploma in education and has been selected for basic teacher certificate training before the commencement of the u.p. basic education (amendment) second ordinance, 1997 or has obtained before such commencement training qualification of-basic teachers certificate, hindustani teachers certificate, junior teacher certificate, certificate of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2002 (HC)

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Anant Kumar Tiwari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2060

..... prepared at the district level is justified. he also relied upon a decision of hon'ble supreme court in the case of english medium students parents association v. state of karnataka and ors., 1994 (1) scc 550 and arun tiwari v. zila mansavi shikshak sangh and ors., 1998 (2) scc 332.40. sri shailendra, learned counsel for the respondents- ..... of 2001, had been restored. 68. the contention of the learned advocate general is that since the amendment act of 2001 has been repealed by act no. 1 of 2002 and the position of reservation as it stood prior to the amendment act of 2001 has been restored a fresh select list has to be prepared for the reserved category candidates. 69 ..... . however, in cases of non-kannada speaking students grace marks up to 15 are awarded. certainly, it cannot be contended that a student studying in a school from karnataka need not know the regional language. it should be the endeavour of every state to promote the regional language of the state. in fact, the government of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //