Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka repealing and amending act 2002 section 2 definitions Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 169 results (0.098 seconds)

Dr. Mohammad Tahir Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC1406

..... automatically applied to the purvanchal university also. he submitted that the words 'adaptations and modifications' have to be given a very wide meaning as it includes repeal, amendment, addition as may be necessary and expedient. the words 'subject to such adaptations and modifications as the state government may by notification in the gazette provide ..... section 5. application of central act 1 of 1894.--the provisions of the land acquisition act, 1894 (central act 1 of 1894) as amended by the land acquisition (karnataka extension and amendment) act, 1961 shall, mutatis mutandis apply in respect of enquiry and award by the deputy commissioner, the reference to court, the apportionment of ..... 's case : air1994sc169 and jainul islam's case, (1998) 1 scale 185 : 1998 air scw 801, are clearly distinguishable. as pointed out earlier the karnataka act, 1972 has only 7 sections which deal with the issuance of notification corresponding to sections 4, 6 and 9 of the central act and certain other minor .....

State of U.P. and Others Vs. Smt. Shakuntala Shukla, S.i., Police

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2574; (1999)3UPLBEC1702

..... 14. 16 and 311 of the constitution, the same would be liable to be struck down being void. otherwise, it would continue in force until amended, repealed or modified.11. the expression 'until other provision is made in this behalf under the constitution' occurring in article 313 is significant. there is no denying ..... an act of the legislature and the government, in pursuance of the power conferred upon it under that act has already made service rules, any amendment in the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules. 1977 would affect the special provisions validly made for fire services. as a matter of fact under the scheme ..... down in johnson v. johnson was expressly approved by the supreme court inharia v. state of rajasthan : [1952]1scr110 . in b. k. srinivasan v. state of karnataka : [1987]1scr1054 . the supreme court held : 'unlike parliamentary legislation which is publicly made, the delegated kgislation or subordinate legislation is often made unobtrusively in the chambers .....

Vijay Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1191; (2004)3UPLBEC2778

..... article 372(1) of the constitution which provides that all laws in force immediately before the constitution shall continue to be in force until altered or repealed or amended by a competent legislature or other competent authority, the court further relied upon the provisions of section 276 of the government of india act, 1935 which ..... people's movement of human rights v. union of india and ors., air 1998 sc 431; c. rangaswamaeah and ors. v. karnataka lokayukta and ors., air 1998 sc 96.]7. executive instructions cannot amend or supersede the statutory rules or add something therein, nor the orders be issued in contravention of the statutory rules for the reason ..... every case, the law requires to be published in the official gazette, came for consideration before the hon'ble supreme court in b.k. srinivasan v. state of karnataka : [1987]1scr1054 . the court held as under :'where the parent statute prescribes the mode of publication or promulgation that mode must be followed. where the parent .....

The Aligarh Muslim University Through Its Vice-chancellor Vs. Malay Sh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC992

..... any recommendations of the and perform the followinglord rector. duties, namely :(3) subject to the provisions (a) to make statutes and toof this act, the court shall amend or repeal the same;exercise the following powers and perform the following (b) to consider ordinances;duties, namely: (c) to consider and pass (a) of making statutes and of ..... resolutions on the annual amending or repealing the report, the annual accounts and same;(b) of considering ordinances; (d) to elect such persons to serve on authorities of the(c) of considering and passing ..... by the decision of a constitution bench of this court in writ petition no. 317/1993- t.m.a. pal foundation and ors. etc. v. state of karnataka and ors. etc. and connected batch decided on 31st october, 2002.all statutory enactments, orders, scheme, regulations will have to be brought in conformity with the decision .....

Radhey Shyam and ors. Vs. District and Sessions Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC628

..... favour of the parties complying for revision would have finally disposed of the suit or other proceedings.6. section 32 (1) of the c.p.c. (amendment) act, 1999, has repealed all amendments made or provisions inserted in the principal act by a state legislature or high court, before the commencement of the act, which are inconsistent with the provisions of ..... not exceed rupees one lac. in view of the jupitor chitfund (p.) ltd., (supra) the u. p. amendments are clearly inconsistent with the section 115 as amended by the c.p.c. amendment act. 1999 and thus the u. p. amendments have been repealed. in commissioner of income tax, bangalore v. smt. shardamma (supra). supreme court held that it is true that ..... saved under section 6(c) of the general clauses act, 1897. in this connection, it is relevant to cite another case of supreme court in m.s. shivananda v. karnataka s.r.t.c., 1908 (1) scc 156. para 15 of this judgment is quoted as below :'15. the distinction between what is, and what is not a .....

State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Home and Others Vs. Rajendr ...

Court : Allahabad Lucknow

..... . the issue was, whether the requirement of a qualifying examination under the mysore fire force (cadre recruitment) rules, 1971 was modified by the subsequent amendment to the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1971 framed for the civil services under article 309. dealing with the issue, the supreme court observed as follows: ..... pertaining to the subject matter presently under consideration with recent guide-lines as noted above, its applicability cannot be doubted. unless the general rule specifically repeal the effectiveness of the special rules, question of the latter rule becoming ineffective or inoperative would not arise. in order to be effective, an ..... has not adopted the rules 1972 for filling up the vacancies of subordinate police officials, it cannot be assumed that statutory provisions of act, 1861 stood repealed. thus, provisions of act 1861 (special act) will prevail over rules 1972 general law." (emphasis supplied) the conclusion which was arrived at by the .....

Daya Shankar Pande Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC671; (2001)1UPLBEC741

..... or accrued right to continue even after rescission of the order. in m. s. shivananda v. karnataka state road transport corporation and others, (1980) 1 scc 149, the apex court while deciding rights of parties under ordinance which was saved by repealing act by using the expression, 'any thing done' or 'any action taken', held that while considering ..... in a. a. calton (supra) on which reliance was placed the apex court held that section 16f of the u. p. intermediate education act, 1921 was amended in 1975, and the power of director to grant approval was taken away but the proceedings for selection had commenced in 1973 and twice the deputy director of education had ..... the claim of the tenant that they had acquired vested right which could not be disturbed unless the amending act contained specific provision to that effect was repelled as the right of the tenant to resist eviction prior to the amending act, 'was nothing more than a right to take advantage of that enactment'. and once 'the .....

Dr. Naresh Agarwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3745; 2005(4)ESC2489

..... such legislative competence of the parliament has been raised. the legislative power of the parliament to enact a law on the subject includes the power to re-enact, repeal, amend or change a statute falling under the respective entry. the legislative power of the parliament can also be invoked for fulfilling the fundamental rights or for giving effect ..... disciplinary action.(reference may be had to the constitutional bench judgment of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of t. m.a. pat foundation v. state of karnataka, : air2003sc355 .36. the legislative power of the parliament, to frame a law in respect of the subject enumerated under respective entries of list-1 and list-3 ..... of law.(d) hon'ble supreme court of india in the case of n.t. devin katti v. karnataka public service commission and ors., : (1990)iillj456sc held that pending selections would not be governed by the subsequent amendment in the rules, there is no question of applying new rules or order to the pending selection.(e) the .....

Vishnu Mohan Vs. Incharge District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2181

..... favour of the parties complying for revision would have finally disposed of the suit or other proceedings.6. section 32 (1) of the c.p.c. (amendment) act, 1999, has repealed all amendments made or provisions inserted in the principal act by a state legislature or high court, before the commencement of the act, which are inconsistent with the provisions of ..... did not exceed rupees one lac. in view of jupitor chitfund (p.) ltd. (supra) the u. p. amendments are clearly inconsistent with the section 115 as amended by the c.p.c. amendment act, 1999 and thus the u. p. amendments have been repealed. in commissioner of income tax, bangalore v. smt. shardamma (supra) supreme court held that it is true that ..... is saved under section 6(c) of the general clauses act, 1897. in this connection it is relevant to cite another case of supreme court in m. s. shivananda v. karnataka s.r.t.c., 1980 (1) scc 156. para 15 of this judgment is quoted as below : '15. the distinction between what is, and what is not a .....

Maa Vind Vasini Industries (a Partnership Concern Registered Under the ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC1002

..... , 1998 (andhra pradesh act no. 30 of 1998)4. the uttar pradesh electricity reform act, 1999 (uttar pradesh act no. 24 of 1999)5. the karnataka electricity reform act, 1999 (karnataka act no. 25 of 1999)6. the rajasthan electricity reform act, 1999 (rajasthan act no. 23 of 1999)7. the dehi electricity reforms act, 2000 ..... , 1910 (9 of 1910), the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (54 of 1948) and the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998(14 of 1998) are hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal,-(a) anything done or any action taken or purported to have been done or taken including any rule, notification, inspection, order or notice made or issued or ..... provisions of this act, shall apply to the states in which such enactments are applicable.(4) the central government may, as and when considered necessary, by notification, amend the schedule.(5) save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2), the mention of particular matters in that section, shall not be held to prejudice or affect .....