Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka repealing and amending act 2002 section 2 definitions Page 2 of about 9,029 results (0.236 seconds)

Smt. S. Jalaja Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... end on coming into force of the 2013 act?. (5) what is the effect of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement (karnataka amendment) act, 2019 (act no.16 of 2019) on right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013?. (6) whether provisions of ..... neither repugnant to 2013 act nor have been impliedly repealed on commencement of 2013 act. (2) the 1966 act is a special act whereas, 2013 act is a general law. (3) the provisions of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement (karnataka amendment) act, 2019 are neither arbitrary nor voilative of ..... by the president on 26.05.1966 to karnataka act no.18 of 1966, stood lapsed or come to end on coming into force of the 2013 act?. 13 1 45. the relevant extract of article 31 of the constitution of india prior to its repeal by constitution (forty-fourth amendment) act, 1978 read as under: 31 .....

Nanjundaiah and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... the state of karnataka and further to amend it in its application to the state of karnataka'.12. by section 2 of the state amending act, all the local acts then existing were repealed to the extent they applied to the merged territories of the karnataka, the repeals and saving section reads as under:'2. repeal of certain acts.--(1) the karnataka land acquisition act, 1894 (karnataka act vii of ..... the said mysore general clauses act, 1899, shall be applicable as if the said provisions had been repealed but re-enacted by a karnataka act'. 13. in view of the above legislative developments, on and from the day of coming into force of the state amending act of 1961 i.e., 24-8-1961, the principal act became applicable for acquisition of immovable .....

m.somashekar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... been made applicable mutatis- mutandis in respect of enquiry, award, reference etc. and hence it was a case of legislation by incorporation. therefore, any amendment, change including repeal of the land acquisition act, 1894, by act no.30 of 2013 would not affect section 30 of 10 kiad act and application of land acquisition ..... indeed even in the judgment of the apex court dealing with the effect of section 11a introduced by land acquisition amendment act, act 68 of 1984, that is in m. nagabhushana vs. state of karnataka and ors. air2011supreme court1113& offshore holdings private limited vs. bangalore development authority and others (2011) 3 supreme court ..... of preliminary 30 notification. this result will ensure no matter whether the acquisition proceedings had been initiated under the land acquisition act or under the karnataka industrial areas development act, as long as the intention behind the legislation is to provide just and fair compensation by introducing a deeming clause that .....

Vallabhaneni Lakshmana Swamy and anr. Vs. Valluru Basavaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD807; 2004(5)ALT755

..... considered on its own facts and circumstances.68. there is yet another reason to hold that the amendment is not retrospective. the amendment is only a substitution of the value of the appeal. no specific repeal provisions were enacted. therefore, when substitution takes place it merely gets embebbed in section 9 and other ..... proceedings, it must indicate an express provision to that effect.19. in matters of substitution by an amendment, it has to be construed that there is no real distinction between the repeal and an amendment. whether a provision of an act is omitted by an act and the said act simultaneously re- ..... repeal and savings and which also makes provision for the new act being applicable to certain cases and proceedings, does not speak of the new act being applicable to the appeal or proceedings pending before the supreme court.56. in r. kapilnath v. krishna, : [2002]supp5scr66 , one of the contentions raised before the supreme court was that karnataka rent control (amendment .....

Rajashree Cement, a Unit of Grasim Industries Limited, by Its Deputy G ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ400

..... academic, as the ordinance which is in force for a limited period, does not operate beyond that period and in fact even within that period having been repealed by the karnataka act no. 5 of 2004, examining the constitutional validity of this ordinance would have become a futile exercise and the validity of the ordinance need not have ..... writ petitions, the petitioners are persons on whom liability is created for payment of what is known as electricity tax under the provisions of the karnataka ordinance no. 8 of 2003, which amended section 3 of the karnataka electricity (taxation on consumption) act, 1959 [for short 'the act'] and levied a tax burden on persons like the petitioners in terms ..... the contentions not tenable. in fact there is no additional burden on persons liable to pay tax under sub-section (2) of section 3 of the act as amended by the amending act. this is because the energy which is subjected to levy is not the same energy. under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the act, levy .....

Keshavappa Vs. the Assistant Commissioner, Chitradurga Sub-division, C ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(6)KarLJ526

..... ('the rules' for short), which states:'29-a. certain conditions not to apply.--notwithstanding anything contained in rule 40 of the karnataka land grant rules, 1969, the provisions of any rule (repealed by the said rule), that the granted shall not be alienated except to the members of the scheduled castes or scheduled tribes shall ..... 12-12-1992 under a registered sale deed. thereafter, he made an application to r1-assistant commissioner seeking resumption of the land under section 5 of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 ('the ptcl act' for short). r3's said application was taken on r1 ..... , with effect from the commencement of the karnataka land grant (amendment) rules, 1974, cease to operate'.a note appended below this rule indicate that .....

Sri B Parveen Patwari Vs. The Muslim Boys Orphanage

Court : Karnataka

..... of 1999 was enacted for correspondingly amending the 1974 act so that the subject matter of eviction from waqf properties continued to be ..... provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state." the contention that there is no conflict between 1974 act and 1995 act even after 2013 ..... mentioned that this amendment was made to the state act in the light of the erstwhile waqf act, 1954. 8 (c) the above having been said, one has to hasten to add that the waqf act, 1995 repealed the waqf act 1954 and the waqf (amendment) act, 1984; presumably, in view of this legislative development, the karnataka act no.22 .....

Sri Dilip Kumar Ghera Vs. The Muslim Boys Orphanage

Court : Karnataka

..... of 1999 was enacted for correspondingly amending the 1974 act so that the subject matter of eviction from waqf properties continued to be ..... provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state." the contention that there is no conflict between 1974 act and 1995 act even after 2013 ..... mentioned that this amendment was made to the state act in the light of the erstwhile waqf act, 1954. 8 (c) the above having been said, one has to hasten to add that the waqf act, 1995 repealed the waqf act 1954 and the waqf (amendment) act, 1984; presumably, in view of this legislative development, the karnataka act no.22 .....

Sri H Abdul Hamid Vs. The Muslim Boys Orphanage

Court : Karnataka

..... of 1999 was enacted for correspondingly amending the 1974 act so that the subject matter of eviction from waqf properties continued to be ..... provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state." the contention that there is no conflict between 1974 act and 1995 act even after 2013 ..... mentioned that this amendment was made to the state act in the light of the erstwhile waqf act, 1954. 8 (c) the above having been said, one has to hasten to add that the waqf act, 1995 repealed the waqf act 1954 and the waqf (amendment) act, 1984; presumably, in view of this legislative development, the karnataka act no.22 .....

Smt Shanaz Begum Vs. The Muslim Boys Orphanage

Court : Karnataka

..... of 1999 was enacted for correspondingly amending the 1974 act so that the subject matter of eviction from waqf properties continued to be ..... provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state." the contention that there is no conflict between 1974 act and 1995 act even after 2013 ..... mentioned that this amendment was made to the state act in the light of the erstwhile waqf act, 1954. 8 (c) the above having been said, one has to hasten to add that the waqf act, 1995 repealed the waqf act 1954 and the waqf (amendment) act, 1984; presumably, in view of this legislative development, the karnataka act no.22 .....