Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka repealing and amending act 2002 section 2 definitions Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 1,133 results (0.212 seconds)

Munithimmaiah Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC1574; JT2002(3)SC254; 2002(3)SCALE194; (2002)4SCC326; [2002]2SCR825; (2002)2UPLBEC1558

..... act incorporates provisions of a previous act, then the borrowed provisions become an integral and independent part of the subsequent act and are totally unaffected by any repeal or amendment in the previous act. this principle, however, will not apply in the following cases:(a) where the subsequent act and the previous act are supplemental ..... of the act read with sub-section (2) of sections 6 and 7 of the land acquisition act, 1894 as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka extension and amendment) act, 1961. the appellant claims that the commissioner of the bangalore development authority also informed on 19.8.1982 that ..... reported in the special land acquisition officer, city improvement trust board, mysore vs p. govindan : [1977]1scr549 : [1977]1scr549 and mariyappa and others vs state of karnataka and others : [1998]1scr988 : [1998]1scr988 .8. in the first of the above decisions, this court, after adverting to an earlier decision reported in the land .....

K.C. Javaregowda Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... duly done or suffered thereunder; or affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under any enactment so repealed.9. if the savings clause in mysore land revenue (amendment) rules, 1960 is read in conjunction with section 6 of the mysore general clauses act 1899, it is clear that the provision ..... originally passed by the assistant commissioner. aggrieved by the same, the appellant filed a writ petition before the high court of karnataka. the learned single judge of the high court dismissed the writ petition and thereafter the appellant pursued the matter in writ appeal and the same was ..... deputy commissioner set aside the order passed by the assistant commissioner. being aggrieved, the 4th respondent filed a writ petition in the high court of karnataka at bangalore and the said writ petition was allowed and the matter was remitted to the deputy commissioner. thereafter, the deputy commissioner confirmed the order .....

Bangalore Development Authority and ors. Vs. R. Hanumaiah and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3631; JT2005(12)SC64; 2005(6)KarLJ161; 2005(8)SCALE80; (2005)12SCC508

..... acquisition act, 1894 which is pari materia with the central act i.e. land acquisition act. by the land acquisition (karnataka extension & amendment) act, 1961 (karnataka act no.17 of 1961) the earlier act of mysore state was repealed and the land acquisition act of 1894 (central act 1 of 1894) was extended to the whole of the state ..... of karnataka in its application to the state of karnataka. it was specifically provided that all amendments made by the act repealed shall cease to continue and shall be omitted from the land acquisition act of 1894 and such of the ..... provisions thereof as were affected by the repealed act shall stand revived to the extent to which they would have otherwise .....

i.T.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1985(Supp)SCC476; [1985]Supp1SCR145

..... market fee; and(c) no court shall enforce any decree or order directing the refund of any such fee.(2)(a) the karnataka agricultural produce marketing (regulation) (second amendment) ordinance, 1979 (karnataka ordinance no. 16 of 1979) is hereby repealed.(b) notwithstanding such repeal, any action taken or any appointment, notification, order, scheme, rule, form or bye-law made or issued from deemed to have ..... act by substituting the words 'thirty paise'. in sub-section (1) of section 65 of the act by the words 'one rupee'. that amendment act was passed in replacement of the karnataka ordinance 5 of 1973 which was repealed by section 4 of that act with the necessary saving clause by way of the proviso. the market committees accordingly raised the market fee .....

Krishna Bhimrao Deshpande Vs. Land Tribunal, Dharwad and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC883; JT1992(6)SC149; 1992(3)SCALE10; (1993)1SCC287; [1992]Supp2SCR331

..... parliament by law. the state legislature thus divested itself of the legislative competence to enact law in respect of subject-matter of the resolution. on 1.4.74 the amended karnataka land reforms act was enacted and under the said act the tenant of the land covered by the act is entitled to the grant of occupancy rights after making an ..... of said topic. alternatively it was urged that, when in pursuance of the resolution the parliament legislates in respect of the topic covered by the resolution, the parliamentary law, repeals or supersedes any existing state legislation on the topic and therefore such law cannot be enforced thereafter.3. we shall first extract some of the relevant provisions of the constitution ..... by the house or, where there are two houses, by each of the houses of the legislature of that state.(2) any act so passed by parliament may be amended or repealed by an act of parliament passed or adopted in like manner but shall not, as respects any state to which it applies, be .....

Rameshwar Prasad and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC980; 2006(3)CTC209; JT2006(1)SC457; (2006)2MLJ67(SC); 2006(1)SCALE385; (2006)2SCC1

..... , when joined by a bill or charter of rights, for the unremitting protection of individual rights and liberties. once enacted, its provisions cannot easily be repealed or amended. it must, therefore, be capable of growth and development over time to meet new social, political and historical realities often unimagined by its framers. the ..... political parties to come together. it does not necessarily lead to assumption of allurement and horse-trading. 124. as opposed to the cases of dissolution of karnataka and nagaland, while considering the cases of dissolution of assemblies of madhya pradesh, rajasthan and himachal pradesh, it was held in bommai that the reports ..... what ultimately determines the scope of judicial review is the facts and circumstances of the given case. a case may be a clear one -- like meghalaya and karnataka cases -- where the court can find unhesitatingly that the proclamation is bad. there may also be cases -- like those relating to madhya pradesh, rajasthan and himachal .....

Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of section 85 of bihar reorganization act, 2000 read with sections 84 and 86 thereof, it is clear that the existing law shall have effect till it is altered, repealed and/or amended.interveners view39. mr. vikas singh, mr. krishnan venugopal and mr. p.s. narasimha, learned senior counsel, appeared for interveners. while adopting the arguments advanced on behalf ..... khetan sugar mills (p) ltd.y , baijnath kadioc, m. karunanidhi v. union of india and anr.[39], m/s. hind stoneo, i.t.c. & ors. v. state of karnataka & ors.[40] and western coalfields limited v. special area development authority korba & anr.[41]. i shall cite paragraphs 49, 50, 51 and 53 (pgs. 480-486) of the report which ..... . om prakash mehta and others[11], state of w.b. v. kesoram industries ltd. and others[12] and sandur manganese and iron ores limited v. state of karnataka and others[13].29. dr. rajeev dhavan submitted that merely because state happens to be the owner of the land including mines, it does not give it power to .....

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Classic Credit Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 18, 1964. in our opinion, the high court was right in invoking the presumption under s. 5(3) of the act even though it was repealed on december 18, 1964 by the amending act. we accordingly reject the argument of the appellant on this aspect of the case. (iii) reliance was also placed on securities and exchange board of ..... 18-12-1964. in our opinion, the high court was right in invoking the presumption under section 5(3) of the act even though it was repealed on 18-12-1964 by the amending act. we accordingly reject the argument of the appellant on this aspect of the case. (iii) reliance was then placed on kamlesh kumar v. state ..... full bench was also distinguishable since that was a case where the eviction proceedings before the court of munsif under the karnataka rent control act, 1961 had concluded when the karnataka rent control (amendment) act, 1994 came into force. by that amendment, the court of munsif was deprived of jurisdiction in such cases. this court held that the change of forum .....

V. M. Salgaocar and Bros. (P) Ltd., Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Ta ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2000)160CTR(SC)225

..... funds. high court appears to have gone beyond the finding of the appellate tribunal which was not permissible. in the later cases, karnataka high court itself relied on the provisions of the amendment act, 1984 and its repeal by the finance act, 1985 to interpret the provisions of sections 17(2) and 40a(5). distinguishing features which the high court ..... , 1984. high court in the impugned judgment could not have brushed aside the consideration of the amending act, 1984 and its subsequent repeal by the finance act, 1985 by terming them of no consequence. high court of karnataka in the case of cit v. m. k. vaidya and the calcutta high court in the case of p. krishna murthy v. ..... cit & anr. have correctly understood and applied the provisions of the amendment act, 1984 and that of .....

Mrs. Zakiya Begum and ors. Vs. Mrs. Shanaz Ali and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the 1999 rent act, particularly provisions of section 70(1) and (2) are set out below:"70. repeal and savings.- (1) the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (karnataka act 22 of 1961) is hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal and subject to the provisions of section 69,-(a) all proceedings in execution of any decree or order passed ..... 1999 rent act, which came into effect in november 2001, was questioned by the appellants. rather acknowledging its applicability to the pending eviction proceeding the appellant amended the same in accordance with the 1999 rent act.12. it is very clear from section 70 of the 1999 rent act that unless proceedings initiated under ..... act 1999 (herein after, "1999 rent act") has come into effect repealing the 1961 act and it was further contended that the eviction proceeding will have to be dealt with under the provisions of the 1999 rent act. the appellants also amended their eviction proceedings in accordance with the 1999 rent act and the respondents .....