Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: juvenile justice act 1986 repealed chapter i preliminary Page 2 of about 1,772 results (1.481 seconds)

Amarsinh @ Dipsinh Sursinh Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2007)3GLR2336

..... have a close look at the relevant statutory provisions contained in the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000. for the avowed object of providing the care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles and for the adjudication of certain matters relating to, and disposition of delinquent juveniles, the juvenile justice act, 1986 was enacted by parliament. thereafter, parliament has thought it expedient to ..... re-enact the existing law relating to juveniles bearing in mind the standards prescribed in the convention on the rights of the .....

Surinder Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3811; 97(2004)CLT611(SC); 2003CriLJ4446; JT2003(Suppl1)SC226; 2003(7)SCALE184; (2003)10SCC26; 2004(1)LC197(SC)

..... the present appeal, learned counsel for the appellants at the threshold took exception to the trial on the ground that the accused persons were juveniles as defined under the juvenile justice act, 1986 (in short the 'juvenile act') at the time of occurrence. there was no determination of their respective ages and if the trial court doubted the correctness of their ..... appellants have placed reliance was not in existence at the time of occurrence, and uttar pradesh children act, 1951 (in short the 'children act') which was repealed by juvenile act was operative. clause (4) of section 2 of the children act defines 'child' who is under the age of 16 years. statement of the accused on which ..... be released on bail in the concerned government appeal and at that time there was not even any adjudication of the question whether the accused were child/juvenile. in the aforesaid background, plea based on purported age raised by the appellants has no merit and is rejected. 9. coming to the merits, though .....

A. Ahmed Pasha and anr. Vs. C. Gulnaz Jabeen

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2001Kant412; ILR2001KAR3729; 2001(6)KarLJ413

..... a protective home within the meaning of clause (g) of section 2 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 (104 of 1956), or in a juvenile home within the meaning of clause (j) of section 2 of the juvenile justice act, 1986 (53 of 1986), or in a psychiatric hospital or psychiatric nursing home within the meaning of clause (g) of section ..... 2 of the mental health act, 1987 (14 of 1987); or (h) in receipt of annual income less than rupees nine thousand or such other ..... of the regular trial courts, manifold in proportion to the pending cases to secure their speedy trial and disposal to meet the ends of justice in accordance with law, legislated the act to provide alternative fora in the form of lok adalats for decision and disposal of the cases by functioning within the schemes framed under the .....

Pramod Bhagwan Nayak Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2007)1GLR796

..... prostitution etc.) and 373 (dealing with the offence of buying minor for purposes of prostitution etc.) the juvenile justice act, 1986 which provides for the care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles contains a specific provision namely section 13 which empowers a police officer or any other person or organisation authorised ..... people with dangerous disease like a.i.d.s.40. this matter raises an important question of interpretation of provisions of the immoral traffic act and the gender justice which is very common today. looking to the importance of the matter, this court directs the registrar general of this court to send ..... stated that he has agreed with the direction relating to establishment of juvenile homes issued by hon'ble mr. justice ramaswamy. however, on the other aspect, the hon'ble mr. justice wadhwa has not agreed with directions given by brother justice ramaswamy on other aspects.30. the matter was reviewed by three judge .....

Nuvvala Kiran Vs. the State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)410; 2004CriLJ1263

..... accused in respect thereof.34a. so, therefore, when the accused is aged 17 years, he cannot be described as 'juvenile' within the meaning and contemplation of the said sub-section (h) of section 2 of the said juvenile justice act, 1986. hence, the provisions of that act have no application to the case on hand, and, hence, the accused cannot claim the benefits, if any, under ..... any of the provisions of that act also.35. the learned counsel for the sole accused has relied upon : 1982crilj1777 (jaya mala .....

Laxmikant Pandey Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC118; (1992)94BOMLR849; 1991(3)Crimes315(SC); JT1991(3)SC582; 1991(2)SCALE321; (1991)4SCC33; [1991]3SCR568; 1991(2)LC549(SC)

..... is perhaps necessary to refer to the provisions of the children's act of 1960 and the juvenile justice act of 1986. the scheme of these two acts is not very different. the definitions of 'neglected child' and 'neglected juvenile' is absolutely the same. the mechanism for administering the statutes is also ..... more or less the same. under section 4(1) of the children's act, a child welfare board is intended to take charge of neglected children. under section 4(1) of the juvenile justice act ..... , a welfare board for the neglected juveniles is similarly contemplated. sub-sections (3) and (4) of either act authorise the board to function as a bench of magistrates and confers on such .....

Vijay Singh Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . when we consider the said submission in the light of the provisions of the juvenile justice act, 1986 (hereinafter called the act) as repealed by the juvenile justice (care & protection of children) act, 2000, as well as, the subsequent amendment of 2006 read along with the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) rules, 2007, it has now become incumbent upon ..... kumar v. state of u.p. this court came to the conclusion that the accused who were juvenile could not be denied the benefit of the provisions of the act then in force, namely, the juvenile justice act, 1986.5. the course this court adopted in gopinath ghosh case as also in bhola bhagat case was to ..... the question of sentencing, the court looked into the plea of juvenility as had been claimed by the appellants. the court had noted the interplay of the two acts in question viz. the bihar children act, 1982 and the juvenile justice act, 1986 and that the bihar act had already been in force at the time of the commission of .....

Subal Duley Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(3)CHN268

..... . sanyal submitted that the incident took place on 8th march, 1996. by that reckoning he will very much be a minor and would be covered by the scope of juvenile justice act, 1986. mr. sanyal submitted that if that be so, the trial by the learned 'essions court would be illegal and this court has to interfere solely on that ground. he ..... in 1993 scc (cri) 251. however, keeping in mind the fact that in the event the age is actually below 16 years and he is covered by the juvenile justice act, the entire scene would change notwithstanding the aforesaid position, we feel that the hearing of the appeal should be suspended and the actual age of the appellant should be ..... of the apex court as also amendments carried out by the parliament, the appellant was below 18 years of age and entitled to claim protection under the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 which came into force on 1st april. 2001.28. so far as the conviction of this appellant, we do not find any ground to .....

Raj Ambarish Sen Alias Ambarish Sen Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3830

..... periphery or ordinary criminal law and subjecting them exclusively to the jurisdiction of the juvenile justice act puts it beyond controversy that once an offender is found to be a juvenile he or she is not to be dealt with under any law except the juvenile justice act, 1986 and no part of the code of criminal procedure has any manner of application ..... in such regard. but here again i am to repeat what i have already observed above that these sections of the act formulate the procedure which is to be observed for ..... a person should be granted pardon or not in order to be examined as a witness does not fall within the 'area earmarked for the juvenile justice act'. in other words, the juvenile, justice act does not make any provision encroaching into this field touching this procedural question and has left it for being dwelt upon by the code. the .....

Additional Sessions Judge Vs. State of Tripura

Court : Guwahati

..... case record making an observation that 'he was unable to try the case as the government after the repeal of the juvenile justice act, 1986 (53 of 1986) had not constituted the juvenile justice board as required under section 4 of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000'. besides, the learned chief judicial magistrate observed that 'the state government had not provided him the infrastructure for the ..... smooth running of the juvenile court'. on receipt back the case record, the learned additional sessions judge, north tripura, dharmanagar referred the case .....