Judgment - Judgment Search Results
M/S. Elbros Textiles Limited, Judgment Creditors Vs. Surendrakumar Har ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-18-1992
Reported in: AIR1993Bom381
were the co-plaintiffs in the proceeding before the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division. By the said judgment and decree dated 19th April 1985, the defendants were directed to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of
Judgment Delivered On: 15th Vs. Sonia Khosla and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 165/2008 % Judgment delivered on: 15th December, 2011 MONTREAUX RESORTS P.TLD. and ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Anand Mohan Mishra, Adv.
The Judgment Rendered in Gemini Vs. State of Maharashtra [(2004) 9 Scc
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
court. It was the court, and not the State, that took up the issue which culminated in the judgment reported at 114 Comp Cas 92 (In re: Gemini Silk Ltd) being rendered. The judgment held that an
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Whether the Judgment Should Be Reported in the Digest ? Vs. Dr. Pankaj ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1 Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.2) To be referred to the Reporters or No.?.3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest
Whether the Judgment and Decree Dated 18.03.1992 Passed in Civil Vs. S ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-28-2014
for respondents No.2 and 3. ****** HEMANT GUPTA, J. The plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below whereby suit for declaration challenging the judgment and decree dated 18.03.1992
Rura Ram Vs. Gurbachna Judgment-debtor
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jun-09-1954
Reported in: AIR1954P& H254
(with the material and the sites thereof and the landimmediately appurtenant thereto andnecessary for their enjoyment) belongingto a judgment-debtor other than an agriculturist and occupied by him: Provided that the protection afforded by this clause shall not
Mr. Mittinti Narasimhamurti and anr. Vs. Pandiri Satyanandam (Judgment ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-1941
Reported in: AIR1941Mad794; (1941)2MLJ386
92 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 6 of Act XIV of 1920. After removing the judgment-debtor from his office of trustee, the Court directed him to pay a certain amount with interest and also
Fathima vs Jayanthi.N (4TH Respondent in the Judgment)
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-20-2024
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 601 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.25132 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: FATHIMA AGED 47 YEARS W/O ABDUTTY,
“a Perusal of Judgment Passed by Court Below Shows Vs. Smt. Pushpa L ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
second appeal was dismissed by the court. Operative part whereof reads as under:- C.R.No.2137 o”2. “A perusal of judgment passed by court below shows that it merely held that appellant is entitled to interest prevailing from time
Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Judgment? ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
AG, Haryana, for the appellants. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. ---
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free