Jains - Judgment Search Results

Suresh vs Jain

Court: Kerala

P O, NEDUMANGADU,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695541 BY ADVS. R.T.PRADEEP M.BINDUDAS K.C.HARISH RESPONDENTS/DECREE HOLDERS & RESPONDENTS 2 & 3:1 JAIN SON OF KRIPAKARAN NADAR, KRIPA SADANAM, NELLIKKAKUZHI, KANJIRAMKULAM P O, NOW RESIDING AT MARY VILLA, M.L.A. ROAD, T.C.

Jain vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 485/2011 OF ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4:1 JAIN AGED 46 YEARS S/O. SUJATHA RAJAPPAN, KALYANAKRIHNA VEEDU, ORUVATHILKOTTA, TC NO.79/377, KADAKKAMPALLY VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695004. 2 KANI

Jain vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 243/2012 OF ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CRIME NO.766/2011 OF PETTA POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:1 JAIN AGED 46 YEARS S/O. SUJATHA RAJAPPAN, KALYANAKRISHNA VEEDU, ORUVATHILKOTTA, TC NO. 79/377, KADAKKAMPALLY VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695004. 2

Wilson vs Jain

Court: Kerala

YEARS S/O.JOHN, THEKKAN HOUSE, 2 MARIYAMMA, AGED 71 YEARS, W/O.JOHN, THEKKAN HOUSE, BY ADVS. SRI.RAJIT SMT.V.VIJITHA RESPONDENT/PETITIONER : JAIN, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O.WILSON, THEKKAN HOUSE, WAYANAD DISTRICT - 673 576 R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL

Beatrice Stephen vs Jain

Court: Kerala

OF THE DECEASED SECOND RESPONDENT/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 4, 6 TO 13 AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED FIRST DEFENDANT:1 JAIN AGED 58 YEARS W/O.LAWRENCE, KULAPURAYIDATHIL, THEKKUMBHAGAM CHERRY, 2 SHEELA AGED 37 YEARS 3 SHEEBA AGED 35 YEARS 4

Raveesh Chand Jain Vs. Raj Rani Jain

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1822 OF2015(arising out of SLP(C)No.29805 of 2014) Raveesh Chand Jain .....Appellant versus Raj Rani Jain .....Respondent JUDGMENT M. Y. EQBAL, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave is

Rishabh Chand Jain and Anr Vs. Ginesh Chandra Jain

Court: Supreme Court of India

COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4543 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.538 of 2014) RISHABH CHAND JAIN & ANOTHER ... APPELLANT (S) VERSUS GINESH CHANDRA JAIN ... RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.: Leave granted. An

Sudhir Kumar Jain Vs. Neeraj Kumar Jain .

Court: Supreme Court of India

COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8151 OF2018[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.13683 OF2015 SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN Appellant(s) VERSUS NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.8152 OF2018[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.21662

Parvin Kumar Jain versus Anju Jain

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2024]12S.C.R.543

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 543 : 2024 INSC 961 Parvin Kumar Jain v. Anju Jain (Civil Appeal No(s). 14277-14278 of 2024) 10 December 2024 [Vikram Nath* and Prasanna B. Varale,

Raj Kumar JaIn and anr. Vs. Kundan JaIn and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC3794; 2004CriLJ3342; I(2004)DMC823SC; 2004(5)SCALE318; (2004)10SCC612

Both are residents of Bombay. The said marriage lasted hardly for 14 days and the estranged wife Dimple Jain started living separately. While the first appellant being a doctor was stationed in Bombay, after separation his wife,