Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Beatrice Stephen vs Jain

Beatrice Stephen vs JAIN

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 18, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1907898

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/1222/2004

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Beatrice Stephen

Respondent

JAIN

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan tuesday, the 18th day of june 2019 / 28th jyaishta, 1941 against the judgment and decree dated 30/06/2004 in as 168/1998 of i additional district court, kollam against the judgment and decree dated 27/10/1997 in os 1/1995 of principal sub court,kollam appellant/first respondent/plaintiff: beatrice stephen aged 64 years stephens house, kaicherri ward, kaikulangara cherry, by advs. sri.p.gopal sri.b.muraleedharanrespondents/appellants and respondents 3 to 11 and legal representatives of the deceased second respondent/defendants 2 to 4, 6 to 13 and legal representatives of deceased first defendant:1 jain aged 58 years w/o.lawrence, kulapurayidathil, thekkumbhagam cherry, 2 sheela aged 37 years 3 sheeba aged 35 years 4 mary ani aged 53 years w/o.ouseph, pallipurayidam,, thekkumbhagam cherry, eravipuram village,, kollam. 5 monica aged 55 years 6 sherly aged 34 years 7 harison aged 32 years 8 soloman aged 30 years chanakazhikam, thekkumbhagam cherri, 9 beatrice aged 25 years 10 shaji aged 23 years 11 wilson aged 21 years 12 treesa george w/o.george cherry, eravipuram village, kollam. 13 shiny cherry, eravipuram village, kollam, mentally retarded, represented by her mother 12th respondent. 14 sheeba 15 shaji s/o.georger1 to r3 by advs. smt.s.leela smt.v.jisha rani sri.b.vinod sri.h.josh sri.v.bhaskara pillai sri.s.vasudevan r4 by adv.sri.s.santhosh kumar this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 18.06.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe matter settled in mediation. hence there is no necessity to proceed further in the appeal. a copy of mediation settlement placed before me by the learned counsel for the appellant. hence appeal disposed of in accordance with the mediation settlement arrived at by the parties. the mediation agreement/compromise shall be incorporated as part of the appellate decree on its receipt from the mediation centre, sd/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 28TH JYAISHTA, 1941 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30/06/2004 IN AS 168/1998 of I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27/10/1997 IN OS 1/1995 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOLLAM APPELLANT/FIRST RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: BEATRICE STEPHEN AGED 64 YEARS STEPHENS HOUSE, KAICHERRI WARD, KAIKULANGARA CHERRY, BY ADVS. SRI.P.GOPAL SRI.B.MURALEEDHARAN

RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS AND RESPONDENTS 3 TO 11 AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DECEASED SECOND RESPONDENT/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 4, 6 TO 13 AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED FIRST DEFENDANT:

1 JAIN AGED 58 YEARS W/O.LAWRENCE, KULAPURAYIDATHIL, THEKKUMBHAGAM CHERRY, 2 SHEELA AGED 37 YEARS 3 SHEEBA AGED 35 YEARS 4 MARY ANI AGED 53 YEARS W/O.OUSEPH, PALLIPURAYIDAM,, THEKKUMBHAGAM CHERRY, ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE,, KOLLAM. 5 MONICA AGED 55 YEARS 6 SHERLY AGED 34 YEARS 7 HARISON AGED 32 YEARS 8 SOLOMAN AGED 30 YEARS CHANAKAZHIKAM, THEKKUMBHAGAM CHERRI, 9 BEATRICE AGED 25 YEARS 10 SHAJI AGED 23 YEARS 11 WILSON AGED 21 YEARS 12 TREESA GEORGE W/O.GEORGE CHERRY, ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 13 SHINY CHERRY, ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM, MENTALLY RETARDED, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER 12TH RESPONDENT. 14 SHEEBA 15 SHAJI S/O.GEORGE

R1 TO R3 BY ADVS. SMT.S.LEELA SMT.V.JISHA RANI SRI.B.VINOD SRI.H.JOSH SRI.V.BHASKARA PILLAI SRI.S.VASUDEVAN R4 BY ADV.SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The matter settled in mediation. Hence there is no necessity to proceed further in the appeal. A copy of mediation settlement placed before me by the learned counsel for the appellant. Hence appeal disposed of in accordance with the mediation settlement arrived at by the parties. The mediation agreement/compromise shall be incorporated as part of the appellate decree on its receipt from the Mediation Centre, Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE PV

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial