Skip to content


Invocation - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: invocation Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 1,702 results (0.015 seconds)
Apr 13 2006 (HC)

M.M.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Art Jewellers and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-13-2006

Reported in: AIR2006Cal169

..... invoked by the plaintiff and the bank concerned agrees that such invocation was in fact made and does not dispute the validity thereof ..... the limitation act l963 14 moreover legality and validity of the invocation of bank guarantee cannot be raised now as it has been ..... with bank guarantee amount will ripen only when there is lawful invocation of bank guarantee if the foundation of the case is without .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2006 (HC)

Maheshwari Brothers Ltd. Vs. National Highways Authority of India

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-28-2006

Reported in: 2007(1)ARBLR64(Cal),(2006)3CALLT154(HC)

..... meantime the interim orders were continued as a result whereof the invocation of the bank guarantees was stayed then both the appeals were ..... refund the sum to the petitioner if it is found that invocation is wrong having held that the learned judge could not have ..... ordered that proceeds realised by the respondent after invocation of bank guarantee is to be kept in a fixed deposit .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 2006 (HC)

The Transmission Corporation of Andhras Pradesh Limited (A.P. Transco. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-04-2006

Reported in: 2007(2)ALD697; 2007(1)ALT515; 2007(1)ARBLR447(AP)

..... 455 163 at this stage the respondent no 1 apprehending against the invocation of the bank guarantee by the appellants approached the court below in ..... no 12 is for us 4 55 163 on account of wrongful invocation of 5 advance bank guarantee the arbitrator found in favour of the ..... 12 for us 4 55 163 which is on account of wrongful invocation of 5 advance bank guarantee the arbitrator found in favour of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 2006 (HC)

State Bank of Mysore Rep. by Its Chief Manager Vs. Pukhrajmal Sugarmal ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-30-2006

Reported in: [2008]143CompCas218(Mad)

..... that on 17 6 1986 the plaintiff intimated the bank about the invocation of the bank guarantee by a notice said to be served ..... that defendant no 2 showed over anxiety in the matter of invocation of bank guarantee by the plaintiff is also a matter which ..... the amount from the bank in a circumstance when occasion arises for invocation of bank guarantee the person for whose benefit such bank guarantee .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 2006 (TRI)

Tamil Nadu Co-op. Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-31-2006

Reported in: (2006)(113)ECC532

..... compounded levy is challenged both on merits and on limitation the invocation of extended period of limitation for the entire demand has been ..... to the department and therefore the extended period of limitation was invocable against them as held by the tribunal in the case of ..... it was held that the longer period of limitation was not invocable against the job worker this decision of the tribunal is not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 2006 (HC)

Survir Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketi ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-17-2006

Reported in: 2006(1)ARBLR435(Delhi); 128(2006)DLT289; 2006(87)DRJ547

..... on the part of the petitioner by reason of the invocation of arbitration has been strongly challenged by learned counsel for ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner that as mere conditional invocation of arbitration can hardly be accepted as an intent on ..... was not acceptable to the petitioner the petitioner inter alias sought invocation of arbitration 11 the respondent no 1 led evidence before .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 11 2006 (HC)

Protosius Lyngdoh Vs. State of Meghalaya and anr.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Apr-11-2006

..... containing the recommendations of the authority in the police department for invocation of the power under clause c of the proviso to ..... the learned counsel for the petitioners that in the recommendations for invocation of the power under clause c of the proviso to ..... the rule principle of delay is not an absolute principle and invocation of the said principle is essentially a question of judicial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 2006 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Madras Refineries Ltd. and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-31-2006

Reported in: (2007)(114)ECC235

..... m s mrl that the larger period of limitation was not invocable for demanding duty from them in adjudication of the dispute learned ..... to section 11a 1 of the central excise act was not invocable for demanding duty from the assessee in this connection counsel relied ..... the period from 28 09 1996 however the penal provision is invocable if any of the ingredients contained therein is shown to have .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 2006 (FN)

Gonzales Vs. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do Vegetal

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-21-2006

..... more focused inquiry required by rfra and the compelling interest test the government s mere invocation of the general characteristics of schedule i substances as set forth in the controlled ..... in promoting public health and safety by enforcing the controlled substances act but under rfra invocation of such general interests standing alone is not enough footnote 2 the government repeatedly invokes .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 2006 (SC)

Mcdermott International Inc. Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-12-2006

Reported in: 2006(5)ALD84(SC); 2006(2)ARBLR498(SC); (2007)1CALLT36(SC); (2007)3CompLJ213(SC); (2006)4MLJ456(SC); 2006(6)SCALE220; (2006)11SCC181; 2005(10)SCC353

..... invoked the arbitration clause by a legal notice dated 10thapril 1989 several proceedings as regards invocation of arbitration clause were initiated by the parties before the calcutta high court the said ..... b wrong principle was applied if however no dispute existed as on the date of invocation the question could not have been gone into by the arbitrator changes under the new .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //