Skip to content


Invocation - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: invocation Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 1,606 results (0.022 seconds)
Nov 11 2005 (HC)

Veer Probhu Marketing Limited and Etc. Vs. National Supply Corporation ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-11-2005

Reported in: AIR2006Cal301

..... given by the respective plaintiffs the plaintiffs and each of them have been apprehending invocation of the said guarantees in connection with the aforesaid three suits three separate interlocutory ..... unconditional commitment under credit guarantee the principle for granting order of injunction both against invocation of bank guarantee and letter of credit stands on same footing in this connection .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 2005 (FN)

Mccreary County Vs. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-27-2005

..... of the northwest territory ordinance our first president s issuance of a thanksgiving proclamation and invocation of god at the opening of sessions of the supreme court the only mere ..... aspects of the establishment clause that do not relate to government acknowledgment of the creator invocation of god despite their beliefs is permitted not because nonmonotheistic religions cease to be religions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2005 (HC)

Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Being a Cooperative Society Regist ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-02-2005

Reported in: AIR2005Bom385; 2005(4)ALLMR875; 2005(6)BomCR55; 2006(2)CTLJ105(Bom); 2005(4)MhLj629

..... are clear and unambiguous and as the document in question remained unchallenged till the invocation of the bank guarantee the intrinsic oral evidence or earlier correspondence executed between the ..... principal debtor a written document ascertained liability nature of obligation guaranteed limitation period of invocation and claim debtor s default and the clause when guarantor s liability arises the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 2005 (HC)

Punj Lioyd Ltd. Vs. the India Cements Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-09-2005

Reported in: AIR2005Delhi389; III(2005)BC491; 2005(1)CTLJ189(Del); 117(2005)DLT496; 2005(80)DRJ215

..... 10 that the plaintiff says and submits that the letter of invocation of the bank guarantee sent by defendant no 1 is malafide ..... the supplies of cement made by it to the plaintiff the invocation amount includes the amount payable to the statutory authorities towards entry ..... the defendants to the plaintiff it cannot be said that the invocation of the bank guarantee by the defendants for realization of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 2005 (FN)

Van Orden Vs. Perry

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-27-2005

..... of religion abound for example the washington jefferson and lincoln memorials all contain explicit invocations of god s importance the apex of the washington monument is inscribed laus deo ..... constitutions many of those provisions however restricted equal protection and free exercise to christians and invocations of the divine were commonly understood to refer to christ footnote 28 that historical .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 04 2005 (HC)

P. Bhaskara Rama Charyulu and ors. Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-04-2005

Reported in: 2005(5)ALD857; 2005(6)ALT767

..... submits that in the facts and circumstances of the case the very invocation of urgency clause under section 17 4 of the act is unsustainable ..... section 4 1 of the act this court is specified that the invocation of the urgency clause under section 17 4 of the act ..... not see any substance in the contention of the petitioners that the invocation of urgency cause under section 17 4 of the act by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 2005 (HC)

Ansal Buildwell Ltd. Vs. North Eastern Indira Gandhi Institute of Heal ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-02-2005

Reported in: 2005(1)ARBLR431(Delhi); 118(2005)DLT274; 2005(81)DRJ147

..... in hyderabad would be the only proper courts for purposes of invocation of jurisdiction since the contract was to be performed there ..... not have jurisdiction to entertain a suit for injunction restraining against invocation of the bank guarantee 17 in the context of the ..... delhi iv bank guarantees being executed at delhi and letters of invocation received at delhi 23 abl in its pleadings has referred .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2005 (TRI)

ito Vs. Novel Consumer Products (P.) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-25-2005

Reported in: (2006)7SOT615(Mum.)

..... directed against order of the learned commissioner appeals in upholding the invocation by the assessing officer of the provisions of sub section 10 ..... officer has accepted the figures of the assessee objecting to the invocation of section 80 ia 10 he submitted that the reason given ..... was not a single question and he was not examined for invocation of the provisions of section 80 ia 10 the learned counsel .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 04 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Karthik Steels Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-04-2005

..... 25 and further that the extended period of limitation was not invocable against them as their classification list had been approved by ..... ld commissioner held that the larger period of limitation was not invocable against them this decision of the commissioner is under challenge ..... of limitation under the proviso to section 11a 1 was invocable against the respondents 3 heard both sides ld jdr referred .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 21 2005 (TRI)

Galaxy Plastics (Bombay) Pvt. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-21-2005

..... neither parts of any machinery nor machinery itself and that extended period of limitation is invocable as the respondents have misdeclared the goods and evaded appropriate duty payable on the goods ..... only person who benefits from such misclassification is the respondent larger period of limitation is invocable 9 we set aside the order of the commissioner in regard to classification and allow .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //