Skip to content


Invocation - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: invocation Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 1,640 results (0.024 seconds)
Mar 11 2003 (TRI)

Sutham Nylocots Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Mar-11-2003

Reported in: (2003)(87)ECC403

..... of the goods as held by the original authority and also invocation of longer period of limitation they have also challenged the imposition ..... decided is confined only to be sustainability or otherwise of the invocation of longer period of limitation for demand of duty and ..... issue to be decided is about the sustainability or otherwise of invocation of the longer period of limitation for demand of duty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2003 (TRI)

Sri Ayyappan Silicate and Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Dec-23-2003

Reported in: (2004)(93)ECC297

..... they have cleared without payment of duty they were liable to invocation of larger period and for penal action 3 the appellants had ..... submitted that ratio of following judgments on the aspect of non invocation of larger period would apply to this case also tamil nadu ..... appellants is justified in such circumstances the larger period is not invocable the judgment cited by them would apply to the facts of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2003 (TRI)

Madan Stores (P.) Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.

Court: DRAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-25-2003

Reported in: III(2003)BC134

..... the appellant defendant contends that the disputes between the appellant defendant and ipcl including the invocation of the bank guarantees were referred for arbitration before the arbitral tribunal by the ..... the arbitral tribunal wherein the disputes between the appellant defendant and ipcl including the invocation of the bank guarantees are under consideration the appellant cannot be heard to say .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 2003 (HC)

Development Consultant Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Industrial Development Bank of In ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-31-2003

Reported in: II(2004)BC295,(2003)3CALLT632(HC),[2005]126CompCas67(Cal)

..... to be stated for the disposal of the instant application filed for injunction restraining the invocation of the bank guarantee 2 the defendant no 3 ansaldo service pvt ltd hereinafter referred ..... fraud or irretrievable injury is established in other words courts do not grant injunction restraining invocation of a bank guarantee except in cases where fraud or irretrievable injury is established however .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2003 (TRI)

Tirupati Udyog Ltd., Bharat Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-10-2003

Reported in: (2004)(91)ECC609

..... duty under section 11a 1 of the central excise act is invocable shri r santhanam learned advocate submitted that all the appellants are ..... for the appellants that the larger period of limitation is not invocable the learned advocate has also relied upon the decision of ..... this we hold that the extended period of limitation is not invocable accordingly no penalty is also imposable on any of the appellants .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2003 (TRI)

Shahnaz Ayurvedics and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-14-2003

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC615

..... the central excise act whether extended period of limitation is invocable for demanding central excise duty and whether penalties are imposable ..... that the extended period of limitation for demanding duty is invocable as there was wilful mis statement and suppression of facts ..... are related persons 15 the third issue relates to the invocation of extended period of limitation for the purpose of demanding .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 2003 (TRI)

Mmk Jewellers and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-19-2003

..... also on 27 9 1997 they also reiterated the reason as to why invocation of the larger period should not be invoked in the case 8 ..... did not file any memorandum of cross objection 15 as far as invocation of section 28 of the customs act to the facts of the ..... to bond also and the impugned order does not discuss anywhere about the invocation of the bond in view thereof the confirmation of the demand by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 20 2003 (TRI)

Mmk Jewellers Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-20-2003

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT722Tri(Mum.)bai

..... also on 27 9 1997 they also reiterated the reason as to why invocation of the larger period should not be invoked in the case 8 ..... did not file any memorandum of cross objection 15 as far as invocation of section 28 of the customs act to the facts of the ..... to bond also and the impugned order does not discuss anywhere about the invocation of the bond in view thereof the confirmation of the demand by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 2003 (TRI)

Surya Cables Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-18-2003

Reported in: (2004)(165)ELT305TriDel

..... fibreglass roving that accordingly the extended period of limitation is not invocable as they had not suppressed any material facts from the ..... of pvc coated drop wire that extended period of limitation is invocable if the material facts had been suppressed by them from ..... demanding duty under section 28 of the customs act is not invocable in the facts and circumstances of the present matter as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 2003 (HC)

Sunshine Enterprises Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-11-2003

Reported in: 2004(93)ECC447; 2004(166)ELT305(Mad)

..... in accordance with the rules made in this behalf therefore the invocation of section 14 1 comes into play after exhausting the normal ..... exercise as stipulated under rules 4 9 10 and 10a the invocation of the provision contained under section 14 1 comes into play ..... filed the necessary bills of entry with supporting invoices and thereby invocation of rule 4 1 was attracted it was at that stage .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //