Skip to content


Invocation - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: invocation Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 1,463 results (0.024 seconds)
Apr 10 2002 (HC)

Sri N.B. Gungarakoppa and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-10-2002

Reported in: 2002CriLJ3311

..... were false and politically motivated apart from that the main contention was that the invocation of the atrocities act provisions was directly towards preventing them from being released on ..... the provisions of this act have been invoked it has subsequently been established that the invocation was motivated and thoroughly unjustified and there is therefore considerable substance in the grievance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 16 2002 (TRI)

Southern Structurals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-16-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC668Tri(Chennai)

..... the knowledge of the department and there was no case for invocation of the longer period of limitation there was a contract ..... retention of the duty paid goods collection of inspection charges and invocation of longer period of limitation he submitted that in view of ..... cannot be said that there was suppression of facts requiring the invocation of larger period the nizam sugar case is not applicable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 2002 (FN)

Lapides Vs. Board of Regents of Univ. System of GA.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-25-2002

..... invoked that court s jurisdiction more importantly in large part the rule governing voluntary invocations of federal jurisdiction has rested upon the inconsistency and unfairness that a contrary rule ..... challenge that jurisdiction and that being so the rationale for applying the general voluntary invocation principle is as strong here in the context of removal as elsewhere more importantly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 2002 (HC)

Gtc Limited Vs. Royal Consulting Rv, Being a Company Registered Under ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-30-2002

Reported in: 2003(2)ALLMR608

..... thusunder the act of 1940 the civil court in theaforementioned circumstances retainedjurisdiction inspite of invocation of the arbitralclause let us examine the position under the actof 1966 in so ..... to restrain the respondents fromproceeding with the arbitral proceedings or takingfurther steps pursuant to invocation of thearbitral clause we proceed on the footing thatthe petitioners have made out a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Binny Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-17-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC774

..... proceedings holding that the charge of suppression would not stand and the invocation of proviso to section 11a 1 as alleged in the show ..... of limitation of time held that there was no case for invocation of extended period under section 11a observing that m s binny ..... site amounts to manufacture and whether they are excisable c whether invocation of proviso to section 11a 1 is justified in the case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 2002 (HC)

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Datar Switchgear Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-07-2002

Reported in: 2003(2)BomCR81

..... tribunal permitting the encashment of the bank guarantees or any invocation thereof by mseb after the guarantees had expired on 16th ..... of an arbitral agreement between the parties and upon the invocation of arbitration the adjudicatory powers of an arbitral tribunal extend ..... the bank guarantees mseb undoubtedly faced a time constraint the invocation of the bank guarantees had to be completed by 29th .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 2002 (HC)

Hindustan Consultancy and Services Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-11-2002

Reported in: (2003)2CALLT302(HC)

..... by the learned counsel of the state respondents 21 the petitioners have also challenged the invocation of the urgency clause by the respondent authorities in the present case according to the ..... learned advocate of the petitioners there was no material justifying invocation of the urgency clause the learned advocate of the state respondents however sought to justify .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 22 2002 (HC)

Dr. Sanjeev Mittal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-22-2002

Reported in: AIR2003P& H213

..... thus in view of the amendment and the regulations promulgated by invocation of power under section 33 the concept of recognition of foreign ..... of the act it is averred that the regulations promulgated by invocation of powers under section 33 of the act that the ..... to take screening test as promulgated by the regulations issued by invocation of powers under section 33 of the act the draft guidelines .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2002 (SC)

First Land Acquisition Collector and ors. Vs. Nirodhi Prakash Gangoli ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-07-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC1314; 2002(2)AWC1131(SC); (SCSuppl)2002(3)CHN23; JT2002(2)SC620; (2002)2MLJ139(SC); 2002(2)SCALE513; (2002)4SCC160; [2002]2SCR326

..... in the case in hand no such urgency having been present invocation of power under section 17 4 gets vitiated and therefore ..... competent authority being of the opinion that the facts situation require invocation of urgency clause under section 17 of the act the ..... question continued to be under possession of the calcutta medical college invocation of special powers under section 17 was vitiated and a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hindustan Coconut Oil Mill

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-13-2002

Reported in: [2002]255ITR428(Cal)

..... as absolutely hopeless does he compulsorily have to accept that the wrong invocation of section 154 will ultimately be upset in appeal and the ..... 154 saying that it has been wrongly invoked and such wrong invocation is to the prejudice of the revenue if thereafter he finds ..... will be subject to challenge as being a result of a wrong invocation of section 154 31 we make this above clarification only to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //