Interview - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interview Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 70 results (0.012 seconds)Ganga Cut Piece Centre Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-27-1981
Reported in: [1982]137ITR274(MP)
sohani j 1 by this reference under section 256 1 of the i t act 1961 hereinafter called the act...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVirochan Vs. Ram Saran Dass
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-19-1981
Reported in: 1982CriLJ1219
orderrajendra nath mittal j 1 the case of the petitioner is that he is the landlord of the land in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEstate of Late H.H. Rajkuerba, Dowager Maharani Saheb of Gondal Vs. Co ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-15-1981
Reported in: (1982)29CTR(Kar)346; [1982]135ITR393(KAR); [1982]135ITR393(Karn)
srinivasa iyengar j 1 i agree that the questions no 2 a b and c referred in relation to the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParamjit Singh Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-15-1981
Reported in: AIR1982SC1095; 1982CriLJ1241; (1982)3SCC317
..... by a committee composed of heads of technical institutions aid in allotting marks for interview factors like general knowledge personality and extracurricular activities of the candidates should be taken ..... that the selection committee has abused its power and directed that the petitioners be interviewed afresh and admissions be made in accordance with the government order and letter which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChakareshwar Nath JaIn Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-09-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC2009; 1981CriLJ1690; 1981(Supp)SCC11
..... a view to bring back the respondent the evidence as to what transpired at the interview with the respondent was somewhat conflicting and the appellant s case was that the respondent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Rajasthan Vs. Smt. Kalki and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-15-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1390; 1981CriLJ1012; 1981(1)SCALE645; (1981)2SCC752; [1981]3SCR504; 1981()WLN84
..... ii to scale iii posts in regional rural bank and candidates were generally subjected to interview written tests however in order to provide some benefit to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUpjohn Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-13-1981
..... interviewees not receiving a questionnaire were aware of the legal implications of the interviews pursuant to explicit instructions from the chairman of the board the communications were ..... need for protecting an attorney against discovery of memoranda prepared from recollection of oral interviews the courts have steadfastly safeguarded against disclosure of lawyers mental impressions and legal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Sanjiv P. Desai Vs. the Dean and the Member of the Baroda Medical ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-15-1981
Reported in: (1981)22GLR1006
..... after getting such applications the college council calls the candidates merit wise for interview at the time of interview the candidate is permitted to change the number and preference of his choices ..... wise each fresh candidate will be offered post of his highest available choice at the interview fresh candidates will not be given post meant for experienced candidates there are certain posts .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEstelle Vs. Smith
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-18-1981
..... the state for a much broader objective that was plainly adverse to respondent consequently the interview with dr grigson cannot be characterized as a routine competency examination restricted to ensuring that ..... not hold that the same fifth amendment concerns are necessarily presented by all types of interviews and examinations that might be ordered or relied upon to inform a sentencing determination .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJago Vs. Van Curen
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-09-1981
..... s having learned that respondent had made false statements in an interview conducted before the decision to grant parole and in his proposed ..... to explain the false statements he had made during the april interview and in the parole plan which he had submitted after ..... conclusion that he misrepresented the amount of his embezzlement to the interviewing panel and admits that the total loss was over a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial