Interview - Judgment Search Results

Moragne Vs. States Marine Lines, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

moragne v states marine lines inc 398 u s 375 1970 u s supreme court moragne v states marine lines...

Munshi Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)3SCC866

..... by a committee composed of heads of technical institutions aid in allotting marks for interview factors like general knowledge personality and extracurricular activities of the candidates should be taken ..... that the selection committee has abused its power and directed that the petitioners be interviewed afresh and admissions be made in accordance with the government order and letter which .....

The Check Post Officer and ors. Vs. K.P. Abdulla and Bros.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC792; (1971)IIMLJ89(SC); (1970)3SCC355; [1971]2SCR817; [1971]27STC1(SC)

..... board however on consideration of previous three years annual performance appraisals and performance in interview finding her not suitable for promotion held court would not substitute its own opinion ..... other than flying crew and aircraft engineering department service rules rules 19 22 promotion interview held allocation of 50 marks is not arbitrary when promotion is to higher managerial .....

Abdul Rahman Bhadar Wahi Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC266; 1971CriLJ284; (1970)3SCC489; 1971(III)LC56(SC)

..... of sub inspectors of police police act 5 of 1861 section 7 advertisement showing that interview was to be conducted after holding written test and physical ability test thus passing in ..... of candidates held therefore physical ability test has to be held prior to holding of interview changing order of holding tests by selection committee would be illegal indian evidence act 1872 .....

Hari Om and anr. Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1970)3SCC453

..... a view to bring back the respondent the evidence as to what transpired at the interview with the respondent was somewhat conflicting and the appellant s case was that the respondent .....

State Vs. Sindhi Dalwai

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1970)72BOMLR396

..... the learned judge however allowed the application and accordingly dr patkar interviewed the accused at the arthur road prison on august 5 1969 ..... been also filed that he got the following impressions after his interview with the accused 1 that the accused had not filed an ..... stage but just to show that his present impressions during the interview with the accused are to some extent supported by the points .....

Mulloy Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... personal appearance he was notified that the classification had not been reopened and that the interview was a matter of courtesy under selective service regulations reopening would have entitled petitioner to ..... the information in the form and accompanying letters together with what was learned at the interview did not warrant a reopening of the petitioner s i a classification however no formal .....

The State of Rajasthan Vs. Shri Guman Singh and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1971Raj191; 1970(3)WLN17

..... for promotion by examining their confidential rolls and personal files and interviewing such of them as they may deem necessary and shall ..... decided by the appropriate authority the committee should call him for interview after communicating the adverse remarks to him so that he ..... should communicate the remark to him and call him for interview so that he may have an opportunity of explaining the .....

Munni Lal Garg Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1970Raj00; AIR1970Raj164; 1970WLN78

..... is that the high court did not call him for an interview on the ground that he had not put in seven years ..... judge 2 that respondent no 2 while calling the applicants for interview wrongly interpreted rule 15 of the rules according to the petitioner ..... respondents mainly on the following grounds 1 that the court called for interview such advocates as if considered suitable for being so called having .....

The Director of School Education Government of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1971Mad440; (1971)1MLJ325

..... committee the government order of 1960 had provided a maximum of 100 marks at the interview and these marks were to be apportioned equally for five items namely personality general knowledge ..... sports the selection of candidates for admission should be done by the school authorities by interviewing every candidate eligible for admission and assessing and awarding marks under each of the above .....