Interview - Judgment Search Results

K.R. Subbier Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1973]31STC205(Mad)

orderramanujam j 1 the question that arises in this case is as to whether the cotton ropes which are used...

Abdus Sukkur Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1972SC1915; (1972)2SCC547; [1973]1SCR680; 1973(5)LC154(SC)

..... by a committee composed of heads of technical institutions aid in allotting marks for interview factors like general knowledge personality and extracurricular activities of the candidates should be taken ..... that the selection committee has abused its power and directed that the petitioners be interviewed afresh and admissions be made in accordance with the government order and letter which .....

D.M. Thippeswamy Vs. the Mysore Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1972SC1674; (1973)2SCC118; [1973]1SCR562; 1973(5)LC94(SC)

..... board however on consideration of previous three years annual performance appraisals and performance in interview finding her not suitable for promotion held court would not substitute its own opinion ..... other than flying crew and aircraft engineering department service rules rules 19 22 promotion interview held allocation of 50 marks is not arbitrary when promotion is to higher managerial .....

Apren Joseph Alias Current Kunjukunju and ors. Vs. the State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1; 1973CriLJ185; (1973)3SCC114; [1973]2SCR16

..... of sub inspectors of police police act 5 of 1861 section 7 advertisement showing that interview was to be conducted after holding written test and physical ability test thus passing in ..... of candidates held therefore physical ability test has to be held prior to holding of interview changing order of holding tests by selection committee would be illegal indian evidence act 1872 .....

Gouri Shankar Jha Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1972SC711; 1972CriLJ505; (1972)1SCC564; [1972]3SCR129; 1972(4)LC604(SC)

..... a view to bring back the respondent the evidence as to what transpired at the interview with the respondent was somewhat conflicting and the appellant s case was that the respondent .....

Sohrab S/O Beli Nayata and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1972SC2020; 1972CriLJ1302; (1972)3SCC751; [1973]1SCR472; 1973(5)LC43(SC)

..... ii to scale iii posts in regional rural bank and candidates were generally subjected to interview written tests however in order to provide some benefit to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes .....

Dr. N.C. Mehta Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1972WLN661

..... hereinafter referred to as the board which was constituted under the rules of 1968 for interviewing and recommending the names of suitable candidates for appointment to the service the petitioner was ..... make valid appointments the government are further directed to reconvene the selection board who shall interview all the candidates for the posts of readers who had applied under the 1967 sic .....

Branzburg Vs. Hayes

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of said organization its officers staff personnel and members including specifically but not limited to interviews given by david hilliard and raymond masai hewitt app 20 footnote 13 the new ..... organizations for instance press credentials are not recognized as being of any significance in addition interviews are not normally designated as being backgrounders or off the record or for publication or .....

Joseph Vs. U.S.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and the statement by an unknown army official that a psychological interview of petitioner revealed him to have a mature attitude and ..... meaningless without more information as to the nature of the interview in question and the particular responses on which the army ..... s conclusory remark was based moreover the interview took place over five months before petitioner first filed his .....

Morrissey Vs. Brewer

Court : US Supreme Court

..... residence to his parole officer the report states that the officer interviewed morrissey and that he could not explain why he did ..... himself in gainful employment the report stated that the officer had interviewed booher and that he had acknowledged to the parole officer ..... to assume that the supervising parole officer does not conduct an interview with the parolee to confront him with the reasons for .....