Intent - Judgment Search Results

Francis Vs. Franklin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rehnquist s dissent argues that no reasonable juror could have understood the criminal intent instruction as referring to the absence of justification the dissent reproves the court ..... the instructions on reasonable doubt and the presumption of innocence the instruction that criminal intention cannot be presumed and the instructions governing the interpretation of circumstantial evidence removed .....

United States Vs. Locke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... there is no room to inquire whether substantial compliance is indicative of the claimant s intent intent is simply irrelevant if the required filings are not made hickel s discussion of ..... significant burden of proof appellees whose active mining claims will be destroyed contrary to congress intent have convinced me that they have substantially complied with the statute i respectfully dissent .....

Meccano Industries (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in: (1985)14ITD151(Mad.)

..... land or not cannot depend on the fluctuating or ambulatory intention of the owner of the land the criterion must be ..... to its adaptability for being used for agricultural purpose then the intention of the owner as gathered from all the relevant circumstances ..... if however the property is surrounded by residences then the intention of the owner would lose its significance keeping these principles .....

Stewart Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... vacated moreover even if this court resolves bullock by concluding that an appellate finding of intent will suffice under enmund petitioner s sentence should still be vacated because such a finding ..... did not explicitly convict on one offense or the other and the evidence supporting an intentional murder conviction conflicts with the evidence supporting a conviction for felony murder thus it would .....

Lohia Machines Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC421; (1985)1CompLJ249(SC); (1985)44CTR(SC)328; [1985]152ITR308(SC); 1985(1)SCALE115; (1985)2SCC197; [1985]2SCR686

..... undertakings rules 1949 which had been made under section 15c did not correctly reflect the intention of parliament if parliament thought that the indian income tax computation of capital of industrial ..... pradesh high court has not proceeded to construe section 80j correctly to gather the true intention of the parliament before deciding the question as to whether the rule excluding borrowed capital .....

Wallace Vs. Jaffree

Court: US Supreme Court

..... requirement is precisely tailored to the establishment clause s purpose of assuring that government not intentionally endorse religion or a religious practice it is of course possible that a legislature ..... the constitution and enact an important piece of territorial legislation which conflicted with the intent of those proposals the northwest ordinance 1 stat 50 reenacted the northwest ordinance of .....

Chem. Mfrs. Ass'n Vs. NRDC

Court: US Supreme Court

..... history demonstrates that congress meant what it said and it evidences a clear congressional intent to ban all modifications first the legislative history firmly establishes that 301 1 ..... appropriate chevron s deference requirement however was explicitly limited to cases in which congressional intent cannot be discerned through the use of the traditional techniques of statutory interpretation indeed .....

Heckler Vs. Chaney

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to alter that tradition accordingly such a decision is unreviewable unless congress has indicated an intent to circumscribe agency enforcement page 470 u s 822 discretion and has provided meaningful ..... the apa s judicial review provisions the legislative material elucidating the apa manifests a congressional intention that it cover a broad spectrum of administrative actions and this court has echoed .....

Alexander Vs. Choate

Court: US Supreme Court

..... guardians therefore does not support petitioners blanket proposition that federal law proscribes only intentional discrimination against the handicapped indeed to the extent our holding in guardians is ..... interpreted to reach disparate impact discrimination in refusing expressly to limit 504 to intentional discrimination congress could be thought to have approved a disparate impact standard for .....

Hillsborough County Vs. Auto. Med. Labs.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at 40 46 the court rejected the supremacy clause challenge discerning no evidence of federal intent to preempt the whole field of plasmapheresis regulation and finding no conflict between the ..... first argument for implicit preemption that the comprehensiveness of the fda s regulations evinces an intent to preempt any preemptive effect must result from the change since 1973 in the comprehensiveness .....