Intent - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: intent Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 2,126 results (0.064 seconds)S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-30-1981
Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365
..... national integration and combatting parochial trends is merely a garb used and the real intention is to transfer such sitting additional judges who have become unpalatable to the state ..... seeks to increase the superiority of the professionally informed by keeping their knowledge and intentions secret bureaucratic administration always tends to be an administration of secret sessions in so .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Thirupuranthakaswamy Devasthanam Represented by Its Executive Offi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-1981
Reported in: (1988)1MLJ26
..... the worshipper from the income of the property indicates an intention that the property should retain its original character and should ..... referred to the golden rule of construction is to ascertain the intention of the parties to the instrument after considering all the ..... were enabled only to manage the property if really the intention was to confer ownership on the first defendant s ancestors .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Soorajmull Nagarmall
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-12-1981
Reported in: [1983]141ITR140(Cal)
..... the general clauses act therefore would be applicable unless the new legislation manifests an intention incompatible with or contrary to the provision of this section such an incompatibility would ..... the general clauses act therefore would be applicable unless the new legislation manifested any intention incompatible with or contrary to the provisions of the section such incompatibility would have .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMiddlesex County Sewerage Auth. Vs. Sea Clammers
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1981
..... the legislative history and other traditional aids of statutory interpretation to determine congressional intent these acts contain unusually elaborate enforcement provisions conferring authority to sue for this ..... carry this burden by identifying express statutory language or legislative history revealing congress intent to foreclose the 1983 remedy or by establishing that congress intended that the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity of Memphis Vs. Greene
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1981
..... impact standard but this argument overlooks the congressional view that these ostensibly neutral statutes were intentionally being used to oppress blacks vagrant laws have been passed laws which under the ..... district court indeed applied an improper standard must in turn taint the finding that intentional discrimination was absent thus to the extent that the majority reaches its conclusion through .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCounty of Washington Vs. Gunther
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-08-1981
..... no findings on whether petitioner county s pay scales for female guards resulted from intentional sex discrimination the court of appeals reversed holding that persons alleging sex discrimination are ..... is obviously more interested in the consequences of its decision than in discerning the intention of congress in reaching its desired result the court conveniently and persistently ignores relevant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity of Milwaukee Vs. Illinois
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-28-1981
..... in qualifying for federal financial assistance for construction projects it was the statutorily articulated intent of congress to make funds available subject to certain conditions for projects to control ..... has under our precedents dealing with statutory interpretation nothing whatever to do with congress intent concerning federal common law when it enacted the 1972 amendments justice blackmun with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParratt Vs. Taylor
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-18-1981
..... the constitutional sense thus no procedure for compensation is constitutionally required a deprivation connotes an intentional act denying something to someone or at the very least a deliberate decision not to ..... be a deprivation of procedural due process actionable in federal court footnote 2 10 even intentional injuries inflicted by state officials must be state action to implicate the due process .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWatt Vs. Alaska
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-21-1981
..... to the statute in 1964 congress declined to clarify its intent in 1978 accordingly we are left to resolve by judicial ..... in any case nothing in the legislative history demonstrates congressional intent different from that reflected in the words of the statute ..... congress would alter fundamental policy without an unambiguous expression of its intent to do so but it is equally unreasonable to expect .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBibhuti Bhusan Basu Vs. Corporation of Calcutta and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-09-1981
Reported in: 1982CriLJ909
..... there are ample and enough reliable evidence to prove and establish that the respondents have intentionally and deliberately gave false affidavit evidence or had reasons to believe that they were making ..... it has been observed that section 479 a applies to the offence of intentionally giving false evidence or intentionally fabricating false evidence for use at any stage of the judicial proceeding i .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial