Intent - Judgment Search Results

Enmund Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... those defendants who are sufficiently involved in the homicide whether or not there was specific intent to kill finally as the petitioner acknowledges the jury verdict statistics cannot be viewed ..... at least partly responsible the court s holding today is especially disturbing because it makes intent a matter of federal constitutional law requiring this court both to review highly subjective .....

Pullman-standard Vs. Swint

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the district court was not faulted for misunderstanding or applying an erroneous definition of intentional discrimination footnote 17 it was reversed for arriving at what the court of appeals ..... teamsters footnote 2 3 in particular the majority agrees that a finding of discriminatory intent sufficient to satisfy teamsters can be based on circumstantial evidence including evidence of discriminatory .....

Rogers Vs. Lodge

Court: US Supreme Court

..... demonstrated its understanding of the controlling standard by observing that a determination of discriminatory intent was a requisite to a finding of unconstitutional vote dilution under the fourteenth ..... law disadvantages minority citizens and its justifications as evidenced by customary indicia of legislative intent are insufficient to persuade a neutral observer that the law was enacted for .....

General Bldg. Contractors Assn., Inc. Vs. Pennsylvania

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in which racial discrimination most often infects our society today although flagrant examples of intentional discrimination still exist discrimination more often occurs on a more sophisticated and subtle ..... the petitioner contracting associations should be immunized even from injunctive liability for the intentional discrimination practiced by the union hall to which they delegated a major portion .....

American Soc'y of Mech. Eng'rs Vs. Hydrolevel

Court: US Supreme Court

..... b petitioner s liability under a theory of apparent authority is consistent with the congressional intent behind the antitrust laws to encourage competition petitioner wields great power in the nation s ..... prevent antitrust violations through the abuse of its reputation is most faithful to the congressional intent that the private right of action deter antitrust violations on the other hand a .....

Merrill Lynch Vs. Curran

Court: US Supreme Court

..... an enactment purporting to strengthen the regulation of commodity futures trading congress evidenced an affirmative intent to preserve this enforcement tool footnote 86 it removed an impediment to exchange rulemaking ..... or cumulatively is unclear the court finds that congress in 1974 affirmatively manifested its intent to preserve private page 456 u s 396 rights of action by adopting particular .....

North Haven Bd. of Educ. Vs. Bell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... written during informal bargaining between the senate s democratic and republican leadership with the intention of providing a compromise that would garner enough votes to end the ongoing filibuster ..... at length the truncated legislative history it ignores other factors highly relevant to congressional intent i whether the ambiguity easily could have been avoided by the legislative draftsman ii .....

Oregon Vs. Kennedy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... itself here however other relevant facts and circumstances strongly support the view that prosecutorial intent to cause a mistrial was absent first there was no sequence of overreaching prior ..... for recognizing the exception first because the exception is justified by the intolerance of intentional manipulation of the defendant s double jeopardy interests a finding of deliberate misconduct normally .....

American Tobacco Co. Vs. Patterson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... injunction however would lie only if the requirement of 703 h that such application be intentionally discriminatory were satisfied under the eeoc s interpretation of the statute plaintiffs who file a ..... would be analyzed under two different tests the griggs impact test and the 703 h intentional discrimination test footnote 5 significant freedom must be afforded employers and unions to create differing .....

AtIn Bose Vs. Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1983Cal376

..... of rights and obligations of the parties as to the true intent and meanings of these presents and many articles of condition thereto ..... judge both the dispute and difference must be as to thetrue intent and meaning of the expression these presents the learned judge ..... of the rights of the parties in accordance with the true intent and meaning of the contractalthough the expression used in the arbitration .....