Intent - Judgment Search Results

Guardians Assn. Vs. Civil Svc. Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... animus compensatory relief should not be awarded to private title vi plaintiffs unless discriminatory intent is shown declaratory and limited injunctive relief should be the only available private ..... changes having a discriminatory impact is an appropriate method of enforcing prohibition against intentional discrimination in addition when the agencies first interpreted the statute in 1964 12 .....

Connecticut Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... respondent argued on appeal that the conclusively presumed language in the jury instructions on intent rendered the instructions unconstitutional under sandstrom footnote 7 the state argued that the error ..... reasonable doubt that a conscientious jury following its instructions will evaluate the evidence of intent and reach a conclusion on that issue before considering the applicability of the .....

Smith Vs. Wade

Court: US Supreme Court

..... judge erred in not requiring a higher standard for punitive damages namely actual malicious intent this argument incorrectly assumes that simply because the instructions specified the same threshold ..... rehnquist reasons that the term criminal indifference must include an element of actual malicious intent this surprising interpretation of the word indifference rests on the unstated and demonstrably .....

Martinez Vs. Bynum

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the meaning may vary according to context residence generally requires both physical presence and an intention to remain footnote 11 as the supreme court of maine explained over a century ago ..... statute does not impose that restriction uniformly a the majority errs in reasoning that because intent to remain indefinitely in a state is a traditional component of many state residence requirements .....

Jefferson Cty. Pharm. Ass'n Vs. Abbott Labs.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or erroneously extending the attorney general s opinion and reasoning representative patman s personal intentions probably are better reflected in his introduction in 1951 and 1953 of bills to ..... thereof the majority speculates that representative patman introduced these bills to reaffirm his original intent that these entities would be covered in light of representative patman s agreement in .....

Sriram Pistons and Rings Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)LC1227DTri(Delhi)

..... to account manufacture without licence and contravention of the rules with intent to evade duty when the goods are liable to confiscation ..... the commencement of the actual resort to 173 h negate the intent to evade payment of duty one would hardly expect correspondence and ..... discussions of the entire procedure to be followed if the intent were actually to evade payment of duty iv even if therefore .....

Director, Owcp Vs. Perini North River Assocs.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... begin its analysis with the language of the statute itself absent a clearly expressed legislative intention to the contrary that language must ordinarily be regarded as conclusive consumer product safety ..... plainly encompasses longshoremen and harbor workers there is no affirmative evidence of a legislative intent to provide coverage for any other type of occupation surely there is no evidence .....

Manoranjan Haldar Vs. Mechfab Engineering Industries

Court: Guwahati

..... to satisfy the dues of the complainant issued the cheque and thus had the intention to deceive the complainant thus the accused petitioner dishonestly induced the complainant to deliver ..... the articles with the intention to cheat the complainant 3 the learned chief judicial magistrate transferred the petition of .....

Abdul Bari and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

..... here again mr mukherjee appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that common intention implies an intention that developed prior to the commission of the act itself and not something that happened ..... occurrence the fact of arrival of the petitioners together cannot be suggestive of any common intention as between them the assault that took place thereafter was a result of an altercation .....

Malsingh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1983CriLJ1411; 1983()WLN268

..... bharatsingh these circumstances show that he along with his brother bharatsingh shared the common intention of murder as against the accused bharatsingh there are the circumstances of motives and ..... kewalkrishan and dharmpal were charged before the sessions judge for the offence of causing intentionally the death of another dharmpal deceased the sessions judge convicted ashok kumar under section .....