Industry - Judgment Search Results

Mafatlal Engineering Industries Ltd. Vs. Mafatlal Engineering Industri ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1992)IILLJ657Bom; 1991(1)MhLj1359

the Company essentially consisted of manufacturing machinery for the textile industry. When the textile industry was virtually crippled by industrial nest

Ms Beltrode Industries Vs. Ranchi Industrial Area Development Authorit ...

Court: Jharkhand

with a view to keep the identity of the erstwhile industry, is producing the same article and it has also retained

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Vs. Member, Industrial ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(3)ALLMR552; 2006(5)BomCR349; 2006(4)MhLj21

and P.U.L.P. Act in respect of employees engaged in an industry governed by the provisions of the B.I.R. Act. The term

Swastic Cashew Industries (Private) Ltd., Mangalore and ors. Vs. Indus ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1966KAR908; (1967)ILLJ30Kant; (1966)1MysLJ373

the principles that govern the fixation of wages in the industry. It may be mentioned that wages are classified into several

Vaishu Engineering Industries Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. A.P. Industria ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [2008]81SCL368(AP)

money or for the enforcement of any security against the industrial company or of any guarantee in respect of any loans

Rohtas Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rohtas Industries Staff Union and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC425; [1976(32)FLR50]; (1976)ILLJ274SC; (1976)2SCC82; [1976]3SCR12

the industrial civilisation of the 19th Century England. Trade and Industry on the laissez faire doctrine flourished and the law of

Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Board for Indus ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2008]145CompCas9(Mad)

value became zero per cent, and therefore the third respondent industry was declared as sick industrial company. The petitioner being the

Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Board for Indus ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2008]145CompCas24(Mad)

by the scheme to provide financial assistance to the sick industry.15. In the sanctioned scheme, Clauses 9.1 to 9.6 under the

Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. Vs. Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd.

Court: Delhi

the Chairmanship of His Excellency the Minister of Trade and Industry, where by it was decided to consider substitute Sub- Contractors/Consortium

Texmo Industries and Others. Vs. Aqua Pump Industries and Others

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Industries and the third respondent to take the Aqua Pump Industries and the Aqua Sub Engineering. It is an admitted fact