Industry - Judgment Search Results

Mafatlal Engineering Industries Ltd. Vs. Mafatlal Engineering Industri ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1992)IILLJ657Bom; 1991(1)MhLj1359

of manufacturing machinery for the textile industry. When the textile industry was virtually crippled by industrial nest and by a long

Ms Beltrode Industries Vs. Ranchi Industrial Area Development Authorit ...

Court: Jharkhand

by the Ranchi Industrial Area Development Authorities. After the said industry namely, M/s Beltrode industries (P) Ltd. defaulted in repayment of

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Vs. Member, Industrial ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(3)ALLMR552; 2006(5)BomCR349; 2006(4)MhLj21

and P.U.L.P. Act in respect of employees engaged in an industry governed by the provisions of the B.I.R. Act. The term

Swastic Cashew Industries (Private) Ltd., Mangalore and ors. Vs. Indus ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1966KAR908; (1967)ILLJ30Kant; (1966)1MysLJ373

petition, who employ the largest number of workmen in their industry in South Kanara, have paid the same dearness allowance to

Vaishu Engineering Industries Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. A.P. Industria ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [2008]81SCL368(AP)

under the Companies Act, 1956, with respect to such an industrial concern.22. Sri V. Hari Haran, learned Counsel, appearing for the

Rohtas Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rohtas Industries Staff Union and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC425; [1976(32)FLR50]; (1976)ILLJ274SC; (1976)2SCC82; [1976]3SCR12

the litigation is concerned. There was a strike in the Industry (for our purposes this expression embraces both the appellants) which

Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Board for Indus ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2008]145CompCas9(Mad)

value became zero per cent, and therefore the third respondent industry was declared as sick industrial company. The petitioner being the

Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Board for Indus ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2008]145CompCas24(Mad)

by the scheme to provide financial assistance to the sick industry.15. In the sanctioned scheme, Clauses 9.1 to 9.6 under the

Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. Vs. Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd.

Court: Delhi

the Chairmanship of His Excellency the Minister of Trade and Industry, where by it was decided to consider substitute Sub- Contractors/Consortium

Texmo Industries and Others. Vs. Aqua Pump Industries and Others

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

of net sales by the said firms to M/s. Texmo Industries. It is also further stated that taking into consideration of