Industrial Per - Judgment Search Results

Orissa Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bharati Industrie ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC198; I(2006)BC362(SC); JT2005(10)SC19; 2005(9)SCALE128; (2005)12SCC725

a writ petition - Appeal was accordingly allowed and judgment of High Court was set aside - MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT (3 OF 1962)Order 39, Rules 1 & 2: [Altamas Kabir & Dr. B.S. Chauhan, JJ] Challenge … directing the appellant-Corporation to pay to the respondent No. 1 a sum of Rs. 8.5 lakhs within a period of three months from the date of order with default stipulation that in case of non-payment the amount

Tata Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC2970; 2008(3)ARBLR1(SC); 2008BusLR683(SC); (2008)4CompLJ220(SC); JT2008(7)SC575; (2008)7MLJ734(SC); 2008(9)SCALE717; (2008)10SCC187; 2008(2)LC825(SC); 2008AIRSCW5015; 2008(4)CivilLJ91

Industries Limited on 1st March, 2000 whereby they agreed to provide CMTS service through a single entity. As per this Memorandum of Understanding AT&T; Wireless Inc., AV Birla Group and TIL agreed to provide services through a … V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Two companies, first being M/s. Tata Industries Ltd., and the second being M/s. Apex Investments (Mauritius) Holding Private Limited (hereinafter referred to Applicant Nos. 1

Hansa Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Kidarsons Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC18; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN78; [2006]134CompCas1(SC); JT2006(9)SC100; 2006(10)SCALE170; (2006)8SCC531; [2006]72SCL117(SC)

case. The relevant facts are really not in dispute. The Respondent No. 1 - Company, namely - Kidarsons Industries Pvt. Ltd. is a Private Limited Company closely held by the Nanda family. Except for a few shares … concerned are either illegal as being opposed to any statute or that it is hit by impossibility of performance and, therefore cannot be performed or that the settlement was not reached bona fide. Learned Counsel appearing on

industrial Paper (Assam) Ltd. Emps. Union Vs. Management Assam Industr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC985; JT2007(2)SC243; (2007)2LLJ549SC; 2007(2)SCALE328; (2007)3SCC73; 2007(3)SLJ20(SC); 2007AIRSCW752;

by learned Single Judge wherein the writ petition filed by the respondent No. 2 i.e. Management of Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (in short the 'AIDC') was allowed while dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant. … categories of posts advertised, mentioned in the reference itself, were workmen as defined under the Act arid the persons appointed against those posts had not raised dispute. Such dispute had only been raised by the IPAL Employees

The Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Gra ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC1975; 1999(5)ALT18(SC); [1999]97CompCas117(SC); (1999)3CompLJ163(SC); 1999(2)CTC460; JT1999(3)SC619; (1999)3MLJ98(SC); (1999)123PLR190; 1999(3)SCALE674; (1999)4SCC

brief, facts of the case in the civil appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 8208 - The Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. (ICICI) v. Grapco Industries Ltd. and Anr. ICICI filed an application … Application to the Tribunal-(1) Where a Bank or a Financial Institution has to recover any debt from any person, it may make an application to the Tribunal within the local limits of whose jurisdiction,--(a) the defendant, or

VST Industries Ltd. Vs. VST Industries Workers' Union and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(6)ALT54(SC); [2001(88)FLR548]; JT2001(1)SC36; 2000(8)SCALE95; (2001)1UPLBEC265

its inception, that is, since 1967; that from 1976 onwards, after expiry of the con tract with the Industrial Catering Services, they had been directly working with the appellant without any contractor; that they sought for regularization … that though the management of the canteen had been entrusted to the contractors from time to time, the personnel employed in the canteen were retained by all the contractors and they have been paid salaries through contractors;

Gupta Steel Industries Vs. Jolly Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996VIIIAD(SC)60; JT1996(9)SC643; RLW1997(1)SC31; 1996(7)SCALE709; (1996)11SCC678; [1996]Supp6SCR669

Bench on 12.4.1991. Clause (2) of the Compromise Decree reads as under:2.(a) The parties agree that Jolly Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Jolly Torsteel Pvt. Ltd., the respondents herein and the Original plaintiffs in Suit No. 446 … learned senior counsel for the appellants, that the High Court has no power after the expiry of the period to extend the time for the compliance on the facts and circumstances, we do not think that we

Needle Industries (India) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Needle Industries Newey (I ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1298; (1982)1CompLJ1(SC); 1981(2)SCALE959; (1981)3SCC333; [1981]3SCR698

man of considerable ability and foresight and in NIIL he saw an opportunity of controlling and dominating as industrial enterprise of enormous potential in a rapidly growing market. The turnover of NIIL had increased from 2.80 lakhs … the Holding Company wanting to have Manoharan as a substitute. Devagnanam carried the feeling that he was already persona non grate with Coats, because of certain incidents which had taken place some years ago.9. The Foreign Exchange

Rohtas Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rohtas Industries Staff Union and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC425; [1976(32)FLR50]; (1976)ILLJ274SC; (1976)2SCC82; [1976]3SCR12

of these two appeals, before proceeding to state the facts, set out the submissions and decide the points.2. Industrial law in India has not fully lived up to the current challenges of industrial life, both in the … V.R. Krishna Iyer, J.1. We permit ourselves a few preliminary observations disturbingly induced by the not altogether untypical circumstances of these two appeals, before

Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board, A Government of Karnatak ...

Court: Karnataka

suit filed for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction.) 1. This appeal by the defendants, a State owned, Industrial Area Development Board, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2012, in O.S. No. 88/2010, on the … on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad, decreeing the suit filed for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction.) 1. This appeal by the defendants, a State owned, Industrial Area Development Board, is